Friendly forums for passionate Dems!
More than 91 million posts since 2001
Home Latest Greatest Videos Forums Hide ads Join up!
Home Latest Greatest
Videos Forums Help
Hide ads Join up!
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»No Background checks beca...»Reply #15
Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

In reply to the discussion: No Background checks because “there were some on my side who did not want to be seen ... [View all]

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.
31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
No Background checks because “there were some on my side who did not want to be seen ... [View all] busterbrown May 2013 OP
this should be a chargeable offense Voice for Peace May 2013 #1
Politics over country Nancy Waterman May 2013 #4
Criminalizing politics? Are there enough cells available? nt hack89 May 2013 #21
Remove non-violent drug offenders Cali_Democrat May 2013 #24
And when the pendulum swings the other way, there will be Dems taking their place hack89 May 2013 #25
Well then, I'm sure you'll find the jail Seigelman is in very "interesting." nt SunSeeker May 2013 #27
Why would you think that? hack89 May 2013 #29
he told the truth. barbtries May 2013 #2
Republicans are Klingons thesquanderer May 2013 #3
+1 freshwest May 2013 #5
Except for that stuff about honor. Orrex May 2013 #6
Perfect analogy...if you squint just a little I think there's a physical resemblence too! (nt) Moostache May 2013 #11
Ferengi is more fitting. calimary May 2013 #13
this one's a real ferengi.. Voice for Peace May 2013 #23
I'll bet he's already lined up his next job... calimary May 2013 #31
Just as they voted with their soul brothers, Iran, Syria and North Korea: freshwest May 2013 #7
well, now it's about 2016 NewJeffCT May 2013 #9
But Obama won't be running; they're working on 2014 to win in 2016. freshwest May 2013 #10
Yes, I know Obama won't be running NewJeffCT May 2013 #17
Gonna run on myths of Benghazi and Boston. freshwest May 2013 #18
The RWers are the ones that vote in the primaries NewJeffCT May 2013 #20
Could be... but I'd be surprised if they don't go full bagger. They've run off the 'moderates.' freshwest May 2013 #22
They are lying, give them enough money and they will vote for anything at all. nt bemildred May 2013 #8
Sticking to it TNNurse May 2013 #12
Um... you could start by naming names, toomey. calimary May 2013 #14
so they admit they're voting for party azurnoir May 2013 #15
Then they had a special vote to deny background checks to people on the terror watch list... sfpcjock May 2013 #16
Imagine a Dem Ccarmona May 2013 #19
This really really pisses me! Vietnameravet May 2013 #26
This why we need to get out and VOTE 2014! nt sheshe2 May 2013 #28
the 'registry', was the problem ... quadrature May 2013 #30
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»No Background checks beca...»Reply #15
Home | Latest Discussions | Greatest Discussions | Latest Videos | All Forums

About | Copyright | Privacy | Terms of service | Contact

In Memoriam

© 2001 - 2024 Democratic Underground, LLC. Thank you for visiting.