IS CLINTON'S BENGHAZI DILEMMA REAL OR IMAGINARY?

[Samantha]

19. It is a total misrepresentation of the situation as portrayed by the Republicans

In Washington, DC, there are always several perspectives from which to view a situation. The one that is constantly ignored by the Republican party is protocol. In a situation such as this one, it is always the Ambassador's shot to call.

This op ed reports that Stevens asked for assistance, but at the time, it was reported that he was contacted by a military officer who was ready to send in the cavalry so to speak, but Stevens declined the assistance. I do believe someone under his command might have requested help, but I do know that officially Stevens declined.

I personally THINK that Stevens underestimated the situation. Because his rapport with the local community was so exceptionally good, I think he did not believe he was actually in any harm. What he probably underestimated was the ire against the CIA clandestine operation in the back which participants of the attack were attempting to raid. It had been rumored the CIA held captives I believe 3 people whom the attackers wanted freed.

In cases of trouble, the administration defers to the Ambassador's call, and that is what happened here. No matter how much the Republicans wish this weren't true, ignoring the governing protocol which determines the call does not make Hillary Clinton responsible.

Sam