Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BainsBane

(53,010 posts)
71. I think his point was that it was three decades ago
Fri Jul 24, 2015, 03:35 PM
Jul 2015

and not her current platform. Bernie had some questionable language in the past too. I don't see it as relevant to his candidacy today.

Also, I saw you say you are Canadian, so why are you so concerned about how Americans see their Democratic presidential options? I get that you are totally entitled to your opinions. I don't dispute that. I'm just trying to figure out why you would be quite so in the weeds with this.

Are you saying they deliberately distorted it that badly? BainsBane Jul 2015 #1
Isnt this lie being used to attack Hillary here at this forum? AllFieldsRequired Jul 2015 #53
It is true. Here is a link to the article in which she call poor people on welfare 'deadbeats'. Luminous Animal Jul 2015 #85
Looks like it is taken out of context to me. AllFieldsRequired Jul 2015 #86
And that can be your opinion but it shows that the OP is wrong. Luminous Animal Jul 2015 #87
But the article you are showing has no context at all. I will look again but that AllFieldsRequired Jul 2015 #88
Did you ever find that context? nt Walk away Jul 2015 #101
I linked to the entire article. Luminous Animal Jul 2015 #103
A 13-year old quote totally taken out of context (if that article is really accurate anyway!) George II Jul 2015 #94
"Now that we've said okasha Jul 2015 #97
Right....she was almost sarcastically quoting someone else. A Costanza type quote. George II Jul 2015 #98
That's exactly what it looks like to me. okasha Jul 2015 #99
i was wondering why it didn't come up during the 2008 campaign JI7 Jul 2015 #2
Well if need you ask......... Historic NY Jul 2015 #28
Perhaps because what is "reported" isn't really what happened? George II Jul 2015 #95
Ok, posters who floated that "welfare deadbeat" assertion, how is this post wrong? SunSeeker Jul 2015 #3
I posted questions in those threads BainsBane Jul 2015 #4
Thanks. nt SunSeeker Jul 2015 #5
see #9 Cheese Sandwich Jul 2015 #10
I asked someone what they meant by "deadbeat," but I did not get an answer. JDPriestly Jul 2015 #17
I now understand the way Hillary used the word "deadbeat," but something still bothers me. JDPriestly Jul 2015 #19
In one scenario leftynyc Jul 2015 #23
don't want to speak for someone else.... restorefreedom Jul 2015 #30
I agree with you that income leftynyc Jul 2015 #31
the bad kids tend to get the whole class in trouble restorefreedom Jul 2015 #35
But first we seem to have to prove leftynyc Jul 2015 #36
i think a couple of issues have gotten intertwined restorefreedom Jul 2015 #37
That's an excellent point and leftynyc Jul 2015 #39
i think it will be THE issue in 2016 restorefreedom Jul 2015 #40
I think you put your finger on the issue that troubles me. I don't know where I stand on it. JDPriestly Jul 2015 #74
Because the important issue here is not what you or I or the mother wants, but the JDPriestly Jul 2015 #81
As someone who grew up on Welfare BainsBane Jul 2015 #34
Yes. But still I question why we are focusing on that "lazy" woman who stays at home. JDPriestly Jul 2015 #79
I agree with all of that BainsBane Jul 2015 #90
Actually, JD, she did call welfare recipients deadbeats. You can read the 2002 Luminous Animal Jul 2015 #44
Because she did say it about those on welfare. The deadbeat dads quote is an Luminous Animal Jul 2015 #43
Right. The Gazette couldn't have misquoted her. SunSeeker Jul 2015 #96
""deadbeat parents." < Since most work who get these that's just a filthy republican tactic, and any jtuck004 Jul 2015 #6
I'm not clear on what you're saying. Could you please flesh it out a bit. Thanks. n/t Cerridwen Jul 2015 #7
So everyone here on DU who called Joe Walsh a deadbeat dad is a Republican troll? SunSeeker Jul 2015 #8
I define a deadbeat as someone who got something they didn't work for. Almost anyone who jtuck004 Jul 2015 #16
I believe all these quotes check out as legit. Cheese Sandwich Jul 2015 #9
That's very nice however the deadbeats quote was from a 2002 interview not '96'98 or 2000 azurnoir Jul 2015 #11
There's always been this disturbing tendency among some supporters of 'outsider' candidates to... wyldwolf Jul 2015 #12
Actually she did say people on welfare were deadbeats, and not just "dads". Cheese Sandwich Jul 2015 #15
was she misquoted? ibegurpard Jul 2015 #25
thanks for the added link however it only covers Talking it over article and for April of 2002 when azurnoir Jul 2015 #13
Those who want to continue to believe the worst BlueMTexpat Jul 2015 #14
Excellent, thoughtful post. (eom) oasis Jul 2015 #20
I've tried to tell them ... JoePhilly Jul 2015 #24
We could go back a few decades and find some pretty ugly things that Bernie Sanders said, you know, MADem Jul 2015 #29
"Could"? More like DID. And failed. Scootaloo Jul 2015 #58
I think the poutrage that ensued suggested that the arrow hit its mark. MADem Jul 2015 #60
She felt the need to pander to the small-government types, so she used "deadbeats." Maedhros Jul 2015 #64
From the tone of your post, BlueMTexpat Jul 2015 #100
I judge Hillary by the same standards as I do any politician. [n/t] Maedhros Jul 2015 #104
These hit pieces keep getting posted on DU and nothing stopping them liberal N proud Jul 2015 #18
Posters who feverishly post hit pieces on Democrats, reveal more about themselves. oasis Jul 2015 #22
There is no smear against Hillary Clinton that won't be attempted sufrommich Jul 2015 #21
truth isn't smear Livluvgrow Jul 2015 #26
She did right here ibegurpard Jul 2015 #27
Yeah, that didn't sound like Hillary. tblue Jul 2015 #32
Except that she was that tactless (link to screen shot of the 2002 article) Luminous Animal Jul 2015 #41
Huh? Here's a screenshot of the newspaper article. "Deadbeats". pa28 Jul 2015 #33
Well, at least they admit that the language and thought is reprehensible. delrem Jul 2015 #38
Debunked: People have wrongly claimed Hillary was only referring to "deadbeat dads" Cheese Sandwich Jul 2015 #42
"Deadbeat dads" or plain ol' "deadbeats", you're beating "dead horses" file it oasis Jul 2015 #45
Stage 1 - deny whatchamacallit Jul 2015 #47
I'll go with Stage 2, "minimize importance" since "deadbeat gate" oasis Jul 2015 #50
It's not going anywhere whatchamacallit Jul 2015 #52
Not "meaningful" in the GE. No republican will play the PC Card. oasis Jul 2015 #54
It's meaningful to me whatchamacallit Jul 2015 #55
Oooookay. (eom) oasis Jul 2015 #57
Look, we all decide what we most care about BainsBane Jul 2015 #66
Credit to you... ljm2002 Jul 2015 #102
It seems to me if it is important to you Evergreen Emerald Jul 2015 #91
Explain the context to us, please. frylock Jul 2015 #93
I see. Republicans, the whole clown car, are perfectly in tune with that language. delrem Jul 2015 #69
I think his point was that it was three decades ago BainsBane Jul 2015 #71
It shows a mindset. It's connected her husband's actual policy. delrem Jul 2015 #72
It wasn't a complaint BainsBane Jul 2015 #73
I realize that Bernie's foreign policy is nearly identical to all the others, D and R. delrem Jul 2015 #76
You're simply wrong that Obama is a neocon or like them BainsBane Jul 2015 #89
I disagree. n/t delrem Jul 2015 #92
in what way does Sanders' "questionable language" relate to policy? frylock Jul 2015 #83
and this ain't the GE.. frylock Jul 2015 #82
Point made BainsBane Jul 2015 #49
You are simply wrong. LiberalAndProud Jul 2015 #56
How is he wrong? BainsBane Jul 2015 #59
The OP found another, separate context in which Hillary used the word deadbeat. LiberalAndProud Jul 2015 #63
I see BainsBane Jul 2015 #65
I'm saying the OP is an exercise in prestidigitation. LiberalAndProud Jul 2015 #67
Buzzfeed quoted a 2002 article. You linked to a couple of 2000 articles. n/t ieoeja Jul 2015 #46
Tomatoes, tomaaatoes the "controversy" is ancient history. oasis Jul 2015 #61
So an article about tomatoes in 2000 is identical to an article in 2002 about rocks? ieoeja Jul 2015 #68
Yeah that's the thing. ibegurpard Jul 2015 #70
Thank you for the research, Cerridwen. nt Hekate Jul 2015 #48
Here is some better research which proves the OP wrong. Hillary did call poor people deadbeats. Luminous Animal Jul 2015 #80
K and R--and thanks riversedge Jul 2015 #51
Thanks for what? Misinformation? The OP has been debunked Luminous Animal Jul 2015 #78
this is simply amazing to behold.. frylock Jul 2015 #84
Yes. She most certainly did. You quoted an *entirely different* article. kath Jul 2015 #62
Thanks for clarifying Sheepshank Jul 2015 #75
The OP has been thoroughly debunked Luminous Animal Jul 2015 #77
Kick & Recommended. William769 Jul 2015 #105
What about this? pjpw2320 Apr 2016 #106
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»No. Hillary Clinton did n...»Reply #71