Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
16. Debbie/Hillary flunked Psych 101/Marketing 101
Thu Sep 17, 2015, 10:57 AM
Sep 2015

Look, EVERYBODY'S natural instinct is to rate the debaters in a debate. So EVERYBODY who listens to the GOP debates is ranking them. Once you have selected one brand or new car or debater over another, you will shore up and rationalize your choice by thinking better of that choice. This will then influence how you view the debaters in the second debate, the 3rd debate and so on.

Once a viewer picks a GOP candidate, he/she has some personal investment in thinking well of that choice and becomes less likely to even watch Dems debate.

Classic marketing psychology. It's like deciding to buy a new car. You look at several models & makes, but once you pick one, you become more committed to that choice, emphasizing to yourself & others why you made the best choice, and more open to seeing/exaggerating shortcomings in the makes and models you rejected.

I do believe Wasserman co-ordinated this setup with Clinton, that there is a significant quid pro quo in play, and that it was the stupidest choice Hillary has made since she decided to stay with Bill after the international humiliation and public rejection of her as a wife and woman. Yes, her Iraq war vote was awful; her vote against banning use of cluster bombs as well - a lot of her votes and actions were against my policy preferences. But other politicians voted the same way. But can anyone name a single elected politician who has remained married to a spouse who publicly, serially cheated on them?

Why yes, yes it is. n/t djean111 Sep 2015 #1
this has gone far beyond them carrying Hillary's water ibegurpard Sep 2015 #2
Its just so stupid. RiverLover Sep 2015 #3
That was the shocking thing to me. zeemike Sep 2015 #19
Everyone knows that advertising too little and too late is better than A Simple Game Sep 2015 #21
even Roger Sterling would never have been so drunk to think THAT was a good idea MisterP Sep 2015 #35
Debbie beltanefauve Sep 2015 #25
Yes, clearly the DNClinton is in the bag for Hillary. peacebird Sep 2015 #4
Recommend! KoKo Sep 2015 #5
HUGE K & R !!! - THANK YOU !!! WillyT Sep 2015 #6
It's very clear Debbie is protecting Hillary. What cabinet post has Debbie been promised? Dustlawyer Sep 2015 #7
That's the real Q here. RiverLover Sep 2015 #9
No kidding... CoffeeCat Sep 2015 #23
Is water wet? daleanime Sep 2015 #8
The sky is blue? RiverLover Sep 2015 #10
Of course it is. in_cog_ni_to Sep 2015 #11
The DNC will be to blame for the 2016 loss. L0oniX Sep 2015 #12
Yes, but on the other hand the answer is also yes. Uncle Joe Sep 2015 #13
You're welcome. This should make every Democrat extremely pissed off. RiverLover Sep 2015 #15
OK kenfrequed Sep 2015 #14
Very good points. RiverLover Sep 2015 #24
Debbie/Hillary flunked Psych 101/Marketing 101 Divernan Sep 2015 #16
Wow, and more good points. RiverLover Sep 2015 #26
Kicked and recommended a whole bunch! Enthusiast Sep 2015 #17
Of course it is. CanonRay Sep 2015 #18
Without a doubt, yes. 99Forever Sep 2015 #20
This is, in part why many are rejecting Hillary CoffeeCat Sep 2015 #27
Second best rhetorical question ever. Zorra Sep 2015 #22
Time to get involved then. ALL of us, who know what's at stake here. RiverLover Sep 2015 #28
That was a threat that was trial ballooned... CoffeeCat Sep 2015 #29
Superdelegates allowed to switch pledges from 1 candidate to another! Divernan Sep 2015 #31
DWS and HRC prefer President Trump to President Sanders. SolutionisSolidarity Sep 2015 #30
DWS wants the Republicans to win d_legendary1 Sep 2015 #32
DUH emsimon33 Sep 2015 #33
DUH! emsimon33 Sep 2015 #34
Anything that damages the Democratic brand damages Clinton too n/t eridani Sep 2015 #36
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Is the Democratic Nationa...»Reply #16