2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: My Endorsement of Hillary Rodham Clinton for President [View all]cui bono
(19,926 posts)I will admit, even though I may have said the same thing to some on here, I voted to hide since as a juror I must remain impartial and objective in my ruling. I did add a lengthy explanation though.
AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
Mail Message
On Sat Oct 10, 2015, 02:46 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
As subtle an application of the Big Lie as I've ever seen
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=662261
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Accusing a poster of lying for a difference of opinion is completely uncivil.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Oct 10, 2015, 02:53 PM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Though I tend to agree with the sentiment - even not having read the entire OP - I think it better to refute the points than call them lies. When you do that you might also point out the hypocrisy of the OP due to the fact that the OP despised Hillary the last time she ran for president, even going so far as to basically, and possibly actually, calling her a liar, speaking out of both sides of her mouth.
Hide.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: WTF kind of alert is this?
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.