In the discussion thread: Do you believe in a 50-State Strategy? [View all]
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 03:41 PM
Liberal_Stalwart71 (20,450 posts)
23. Not if we want a more progressive majority. A 50-state stategy means that we will
inevitably get Blue Dog Democrats.
If the overall, most intelligent approach is to elect as many Democrats to Congress as possible, regardless of their ideology, then yes, a 50-state strategy works. But having to hear many people here on DU complain about why it is Obama's policies aren't liberal or progressive enough is tiring. It is precisely due to the 50-state strategy that we got Democrats like Jon Tester, Claire McCaskill and Blanche Lincoln. They are Democrats, but they are Blue Dogs. The answer is simple: it depends on what outcome we want. If we want more progressives, then a 50-state strategy won't do. We need to target progressive Democrats in each state and groom them for office. The question is: are there enough progressive Democrats running in each of the 50 states to affect the outcome? If not, then a straight 50-state strategy will have to do. |
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
ellisonz | Jan 2012 | OP | |
dimbear | Jan 2012 | #1 | |
DCKit | Jan 2012 | #2 | |
ellisonz | Jan 2012 | #11 | |
limpyhobbler | Jan 2012 | #3 | |
DCBob | Jan 2012 | #4 | |
Cosmocat | Jan 2012 | #5 | |
ellisonz | Jan 2012 | #13 | |
Cosmocat | Jan 2012 | #20 | |
Liberal_Stalwart71 | Jan 2012 | #24 | |
JNelson6563 | Feb 2012 | #34 | |
ellisonz | Feb 2012 | #35 | |
CanonRay | Jan 2012 | #6 | |
ellisonz | Jan 2012 | #14 | |
CanonRay | Jan 2012 | #17 | |
sofa king | Jan 2012 | #7 | |
Proud Liberal Dem | Jan 2012 | #9 | |
ellisonz | Jan 2012 | #12 | |
Liberal_Stalwart71 | Jan 2012 | #25 | |
ellisonz | Jan 2012 | #26 | |
3waygeek | Feb 2012 | #41 | |
ellisonz | Feb 2012 | #43 | |
3waygeek | Feb 2012 | #44 | |
ellisonz | Feb 2012 | #45 | |
Proud Liberal Dem | Jan 2012 | #8 | |
ellisonz | Jan 2012 | #15 | |
denem | Jan 2012 | #10 | |
ellisonz | Jan 2012 | #16 | |
Drunken Irishman | Jan 2012 | #18 | |
ellisonz | Jan 2012 | #19 | |
davidpdx | Feb 2012 | #38 | |
renie408 | Jan 2012 | #21 | |
ellisonz | Jan 2012 | #22 | |
![]() ![]() |
Liberal_Stalwart71 | Jan 2012 | #23 |
tallahasseedem | Jan 2012 | #27 | |
libodem | Jan 2012 | #28 | |
ellisonz | Jan 2012 | #29 | |
libodem | Jan 2012 | #31 | |
quaker bill | Jan 2012 | #30 | |
bemildred | Feb 2012 | #32 | |
rocktivity | Feb 2012 | #33 | |
ellisonz | Feb 2012 | #36 | |
joshcryer | Feb 2012 | #37 | |
UCmeNdc | Feb 2012 | #39 | |
Alexander | Feb 2012 | #40 | |
Generic Brad | Feb 2012 | #42 |
Edit History
Please login to view edit histories.