Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Snotcicles

(9,089 posts)
87. Here you go just minutes after the debates. What he had to say at 11:05 pm EST that night
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 09:13 PM
Nov 2015

[link:

|
I don't see it that way. yardwork Nov 2015 #1
I agree. Bleacher Creature Nov 2015 #5
He was talking about the FBI investigation, not the Republican-led committee. Fawke Em Nov 2015 #11
But the FBI made it clear Buzz cook Nov 2015 #47
You're right and wrong jkbRN Nov 2015 #50
The FBI is investigating on behalf of Hillary Capn Sunshine Nov 2015 #85
Lmao jkbRN Nov 2015 #98
Media Matters is no longer impartial. frylock Nov 2015 #62
Either the information is accurate Buzz cook Nov 2015 #83
No one ever said she was the target. In fact, my earlier jkbRN Nov 2015 #101
How is defending a citation Buzz cook Nov 2015 #114
Agreed! jkbRN Nov 2015 #99
because they don't want to notadmblnd Nov 2015 #105
By saying the same thing he said right after the debate? Fawke Em Nov 2015 #6
Its actually HRC supporters twisting his words. They have no shame, just like republicans. Elmer S. E. Dump Nov 2015 #41
And your proof? scscholar Nov 2015 #57
You need proof. That's understandable. Elmer S. E. Dump Nov 2015 #78
+1 zappaman Nov 2015 #10
It's an FBI investigation, not a congressional committee. jeff47 Nov 2015 #17
There was no information on Clinton's server marked classified at the time it was on the server upaloopa Nov 2015 #32
Information is classified whether or not it is marked. jeff47 Nov 2015 #33
You don't know that. That is still heresay. Elmer S. E. Dump Nov 2015 #42
Great, the investigation will bear that out jberryhill Nov 2015 #79
I'm sorry, but you're wrong Oilwellian Nov 2015 #94
No I am not upaloopa Nov 2015 #97
The IGs of Intel and State would disagree Oilwellian Nov 2015 #106
That story fizzled out. Which BootinUp Nov 2015 #102
Fizzled out? Hardly Oilwellian Nov 2015 #107
One thing that is true, is that the media has done a poor job BootinUp Nov 2015 #111
No, I'm not confused. I'm referring to Bernie's statements. yardwork Nov 2015 #52
His statements are about the FBI investigation. There is no congressional investigation jeff47 Nov 2015 #53
You ARE NOT disappointed - you are giddy! Don't lie, because we see right through it. Elmer S. E. Dump Nov 2015 #39
Why would I be giddy? yardwork Nov 2015 #49
Heck, I don't know. Projection on my part? I get off work now - have a great day!! Elmer S. E. Dump Nov 2015 #56
You too! Enjoy the rest of the day. yardwork Nov 2015 #81
then you just heard what you wanted to hear Motown_Johnny Nov 2015 #88
Yeah, but HassleCat Nov 2015 #2
The server issue isn't a committee inquiry, is it? Fawke Em Nov 2015 #4
It is Oilwellian Nov 2015 #108
Thanks for proving the point! VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #8
Thanks for proving the point! AlbertCat Nov 2015 #64
Are we on the platground now? VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #67
Do you mean "playground"? AlbertCat Nov 2015 #70
Yes on a phone on a train... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #71
In this particular case, the investigation is over classified in the emails jeff47 Nov 2015 #15
OK, that's different HassleCat Nov 2015 #24
Personal accounts was common practice, but so far classified in those accounts is new. jeff47 Nov 2015 #26
Well, that's because they haven't been investigated with that in mind. HassleCat Nov 2015 #28
Actually, it isn't too late. There's no statute of limitations on espionage. jeff47 Nov 2015 #29
That's what we call wishful thinking. Elmer S. E. Dump Nov 2015 #43
It's kind of like with Nixon HassleCat Nov 2015 #48
Thank you. It isn't a flip-flop. Fawke Em Nov 2015 #3
Thank you Armstead Nov 2015 #7
If he had added "Let's wait for the FBI and Congress to finish their investigations" Nye Bevan Nov 2015 #9
Except he did say that right after the debate when he was interviewed. eom Fawke Em Nov 2015 #12
Maybe you should join his team as a consultant. Elmer S. E. Dump Nov 2015 #44
Well said, thank you for posting. emulatorloo Nov 2015 #13
I think it actually is a flip-flop. But it's not one that will do much damage on a national level. NurseJackie Nov 2015 #14
Bernie's debate comment was directed at the media obsession 99th_Monkey Nov 2015 #16
THIS. n/t retrowire Nov 2015 #18
Twue. aidbo Nov 2015 #23
In the full context of what he actually said deutsey Nov 2015 #19
THIS. Thank you for logic. n/t retrowire Nov 2015 #20
Logic fucking rocks doesn't it. Phlem Nov 2015 #58
it rocks so hard. n/t retrowire Nov 2015 #84
Here you go just minutes after the debates. What he had to say at 11:05 pm EST that night Snotcicles Nov 2015 #87
Well, team Clinton has spent so much time lying about the emails, it's an easy mistake to make. jeff47 Nov 2015 #21
According to the IGs official statement Oilwellian Nov 2015 #109
Yes, when I said "State" I was referring to later statements by State's spokespeople. (nt) jeff47 Nov 2015 #113
i agree. JI7 Nov 2015 #22
I believe the "tired of the damn emails" was actually a jab at Clinton Nitram Nov 2015 #25
Interesting. I hadn't thought of that. NurseJackie Nov 2015 #37
Some folks made that suggestion after the debate. I didn't think they were right at the time. stevenleser Nov 2015 #93
. MohRokTah Nov 2015 #27
This pretty much sums up your average post on these forums. RichVRichV Nov 2015 #82
It's refreshing to see DU embracing the idea of nuance for a change. Skinner Nov 2015 #30
Disappointed DownriverDem Nov 2015 #31
Nothing there to fix. DU is so full of suspicion about any comments they fear, Ford_Prefect Nov 2015 #35
The only thing more amusing than politicianas flip-flopping Tarc Nov 2015 #34
I'm not a Sanders supporter. NuclearDem Nov 2015 #36
I see Tarc Nov 2015 #40
WTF? Really? I'm not a Sanders supporter either riderinthestorm Nov 2015 #51
Do you plan on using them? AlbertCat Nov 2015 #66
All you will get for your efforts is more bullshit, propaganda, and obfuscation. Elmer S. E. Dump Nov 2015 #38
Agreed... Did You Catch This: WillyT Nov 2015 #45
I knew Sanders was talking about the media, but HRC cleverly grabbed the chance... polichick Nov 2015 #46
It occurs to me that the accusation you make against Clinton, Nitram Nov 2015 #54
Which part of "clever, opportunistic and shameless" do you have a problem with... polichick Nov 2015 #60
Is there a statute of limitations for these type of investigations ToxMarz Nov 2015 #55
There's no statute of limitations on espionage. jeff47 Nov 2015 #59
There has been no finding the Hillary's email contained classified information. SunSeeker Nov 2015 #65
There has been a finding. It isn't a legal finding. jeff47 Nov 2015 #68
There is no finding. SunSeeker Nov 2015 #72
Again, information is classified whether or not it is marked. jeff47 Nov 2015 #73
The FBI is not investigating Clinton. nt SunSeeker Nov 2015 #74
They are not conducting a criminal investigation against Clinton. jeff47 Nov 2015 #75
The FBI is not conducting any investigation of Clinton. nt SunSeeker Nov 2015 #77
Do you have a new mantra? jeff47 Nov 2015 #86
The FBI is not investigating anybody with regard to Hillary's emails. SunSeeker Nov 2015 #89
So yes, you have a new mantra. jeff47 Nov 2015 #90
It is not a "new mantra." I am simply stating facts that have been out there for months. SunSeeker Nov 2015 #91
No, you aren't stating facts. jeff47 Nov 2015 #92
No, you're lying because your candidate is dropping in the polls. SunSeeker Nov 2015 #95
You started with there's no FBI investigation at all, later admitted this was false. jeff47 Nov 2015 #96
I did not admit anything I said was false. SunSeeker Nov 2015 #100
You just later said the opposite. jeff47 Nov 2015 #103
It's your candidate who is changing the subject. SunSeeker Nov 2015 #104
I didn't regurgitate anything ToxMarz Nov 2015 #80
Wayyyyyyyy too nuanced for the average person.... AlbertCat Nov 2015 #61
He goes from not wanting to hear about it to calling it a valid investigation. SunSeeker Nov 2015 #63
Try reading the half-a-dozen times up thread.... AlbertCat Nov 2015 #69
Try reading the context in which Bernie was asked the question. SunSeeker Nov 2015 #76
NO it's not a flip-flop.. it's a desperate flipflop.. thanks for your opinion but others have Cha Nov 2015 #110
The best possible outcome for Clinton would be for the whole mess to last another 6 months eridani Nov 2015 #112
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»It's not a flip-flop. Ser...»Reply #87