Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
95. I'm from California. In recent elections, we have been a very blue state.
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 12:08 AM
Nov 2015

Our large immigrant population and urban centers mean we are liberal.

But we don't vote in the primary until June.

People from red and purple states vote and decide what candidates are still running when we finally get a chance to have a voice.

The order of the primaries should be changed.

Democrats should allow heavily Democratic states to vote first.

As it is now, Iowa is fairly conservative, New Hampshire moderate and South Carolina very conservative. None of the really, really liberal states like California, Oregon, New York, Massachusetts, etc. get a word in until the conservatives have picked the candidate.

That is wrong. It pushes the nation rightward, ever rightward. We see the results in the chaotic, anti-government bunch leading Congress right now.

Good for Clinton, she is strong and now lots of people are listening to her and like Thinkingabout Nov 2015 #1
. Purveyor Nov 2015 #2
Hi DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2015 #5
Emma is cute Dem2 Nov 2015 #23
While the country loses. Fawke Em Nov 2015 #59
In your opinion. DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2015 #70
Here's something to laugh about! Walk away Nov 2015 #7
No love for O'Malley Renew Deal Nov 2015 #14
It's nice that all three of our potential nominees Eric J in MN Nov 2015 #38
Excellent comment! eom BlueMTexpat Nov 2015 #83
I'd laugh too, but ppp in no way reflects what I've heard elleng Nov 2015 #10
They probably didn't invite Bernie Supporters to click a 100 times each! Walk away Nov 2015 #17
If I heard correctly... msrizzo Nov 2015 #28
If true, then this is further evidence of just how out of touch DUers are taught_me_patience Nov 2015 #3
If this is true Trajan Nov 2015 #27
Go back a few years. MADem Nov 2015 #53
No Democrat has a chance in South Carolina. JDPriestly Nov 2015 #79
South Carolina Democrats, though, still get to vote MineralMan Nov 2015 #90
K AND R DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2015 #4
How do you "win" a forum? It didn't even pretend to be a debate, The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2015 #6
You will need to ask PPP. nt DURHAM D Nov 2015 #8
If bernie or O'M would have "won" there would be no question.. I saw DU after.. they said BS won!!!! Cha Nov 2015 #46
Exactly, it's a b.s. question. elleng Nov 2015 #9
I guess it's a subjective thing to each person asked. SunSeeker Nov 2015 #11
How could you watch any of the three and be 'less positive'? I don't KingCharlemagne Nov 2015 #89
Yeah, this is getting kind of stupid. NuclearDem Nov 2015 #15
The "winner" would be the candidate who more people believed, or NurseJackie Nov 2015 #18
You are assuming facts not in evidence. The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2015 #19
Circumstancial evidence is evidence, counsel. nt SunSeeker Nov 2015 #20
I'll take you at your word. My mistake. You're not at all upset with these poll results. Got it. NurseJackie Nov 2015 #21
Nice. Nasty and snarky just for the sake of being nasty and snarky. I've noticed this pattern Ned_Devine Nov 2015 #42
Actually, I'm not; but if that's what you want to think, I can't stop you. The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2015 #47
No worries, NurseJackie.. I've "noticed patterns" about the one who "notices patterns" on you. Cha Nov 2015 #48
"Winning" in South Carolina is utterly irrelevant in deciding who should win our JDPriestly Nov 2015 #80
Fortunately the demographic of cable subscribers is not the same as that of the voter. corkhead Nov 2015 #12
How many saw the forum? jfern Nov 2015 #13
The full poll is supposed to be released tomorrow. SunSeeker Nov 2015 #24
And then let's see what the naysayers will be nay..........saying! George II Nov 2015 #37
How clever. You updated the flyswatter to a can of bug spray that cracks the glass ceiling. peacebird Nov 2015 #77
Hillary Crushed Sanders. William769 Nov 2015 #16
She's always the smartest one in the room Rose Siding Nov 2015 #30
!! George II Nov 2015 #35
Damn Straight. They're not taking it well.. as usual. Cha Nov 2015 #49
No, actually, it's not. Fawke Em Nov 2015 #57
Gravitas, thy name is Hillary. oasis Nov 2015 #22
On Hayes, she did a bit of subtle Gloria Nov 2015 #25
I was hoping Rachael would come clean about DURHAM D Nov 2015 #29
Rachel disappointed me when she was asked her opinion about pnwmom Nov 2015 #44
Honestly I just don't think Rachael is in any way a feminist. DURHAM D Nov 2015 #45
Well, the People in the poll thought differently than Rachel. Hillary got the hard questions and Cha Nov 2015 #50
Hillary was great at this forum Gothmog Nov 2015 #26
Fans of the death penalty Eric J in MN Nov 2015 #31
"Fans" of the death penalty? Yawn! George II Nov 2015 #34
The death penalty was the policy position Eric J in MN Nov 2015 #36
A majority of Democrats support the death penalty Recursion Nov 2015 #88
kick n/t cosmicone Nov 2015 #32
Thanks. Just confirmed my initial assessment of the forum last week. She KILLED! George II Nov 2015 #33
The Young Turks... MrWendel Nov 2015 #39
they're always having one. they're having a continuous stream of hissy fits during Obama's Admin Cha Nov 2015 #52
How many pollled actually saw the forum? Bernblu Nov 2015 #40
The full poll, with methodology, is supposed to be released tomorrow. SunSeeker Nov 2015 #43
MSNBC producers must think we are stupid.. INdemo Nov 2015 #41
All 10 viewers n/t ram2008 Nov 2015 #51
2.3 million watched. SunSeeker Nov 2015 #54
LOL "10 viewers"?! Oh my.. someone is bitter. Cha Nov 2015 #56
I love this! If the poll showed BS had won like GDP said then it would be GREAT.. but, since the Cha Nov 2015 #55
Hillary Paid People To Troll Bernie...Interesting billhicks76 Nov 2015 #58
No she didn't. SunSeeker Nov 2015 #60
Nope, you're citing an internet troll. Cha Nov 2015 #61
When There's Smoke There's Fire billhicks76 Nov 2015 #63
Yeah, keep digging. Cha Nov 2015 #64
No Need...Every Liberal I Know Says She's A Liar billhicks76 Nov 2015 #65
you need a bigger shovel. Cha Nov 2015 #66
Obama Turban Photo? billhicks76 Nov 2015 #68
keep going Cha Nov 2015 #69
Don't Have To billhicks76 Nov 2015 #72
yep you're still diggin' Cha Nov 2015 #73
You Make It Fun billhicks76 Nov 2015 #74
digging a hole. Cha Nov 2015 #76
And Coming Out The Other End billhicks76 Nov 2015 #81
Diggin For The Truth billhicks76 Nov 2015 #75
It is quite likely that the "liberals" you know BlueMTexpat Nov 2015 #82
Nice Try billhicks76 Nov 2015 #85
As do Republicans. You keep great company (NOT) riversedge Nov 2015 #84
You've Been Played...There's Your Problem billhicks76 Nov 2015 #87
She really didn't though. But ok. Fearless Nov 2015 #62
Just Lie Is Her Creed billhicks76 Nov 2015 #67
In my unvarnished opinion Hillary was the winner. DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2015 #71
With due respect to South Carolina Democrats, South Carolina votes Republican JDPriestly Nov 2015 #78
Silly post. First concern for Hillary is to get the Primary vote and delegates. I am riversedge Nov 2015 #86
Hillary is creaming Bernie in SC because of the AA vote in SC. SunSeeker Nov 2015 #91
But are there enough AA voters in SC to win the state in the generral election? JDPriestly Nov 2015 #92
Hillary does better than Bernie in the South, regardless of race. nt SunSeeker Nov 2015 #94
Which has nothing to do with the DEMOCRATIC primary in South Carolina. DCBob Nov 2015 #93
I'm from California. In recent elections, we have been a very blue state. JDPriestly Nov 2015 #95
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»PPP: Hillary Won the SC ...»Reply #95