Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Showing Original Post only (View all)Hillary Clinton: Elitist, Imperialist, Politician Extraordinaire [View all]
The Democratic Party continues its illicit love affair with presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, when asked about then Senator Clintons vote authorizing President George Bushs disastrous and murderous invasion of Iraq, said this: Elections are about the future. Theyre not about what happened 13 years ago. Theyre about the future, and thats really what people want to hear. Yes, this is the same Mrs. Pelosi who took the possibility of the impeachment of Mr. Bush off the table, because the evidence wasnt there, she said, and she apparently had no interest in looking for it. So, as with Mr. Bush, with Mrs. Clinton we need not look at what shes actually done, only at what she says she will do in the future. One is reminded of the abusive husband who, during the remorse stage, swears that hell never again strike his wife. No need to look at a long pattern of abuse; simply take his word that there will be no more.
Unfortunately, we must, as voters and potential victims of a Hillary Clinton presidency, look back, forward and to the present. And it is that alarming present, put in context by the not-too-distant past, that should give everyone pause.
Mrs. Clinton either has, or is expected to raise, upwards of $2 billion dollars to purchase a four-year lease to the White House. She might wish the public to believe that hard-working United States citizens, toiling at the shop or office every day, are scraping together $5.00 and $10.00 donations, all of which, in total, achieves that $2 billion. However, such is not the case. Mrs. Clintons presidential campaign is being financed by the same organizations that fund her and her husbands charitable organization, and that list includes at least 118 individuals and companies that lobbied the State Department when Mrs. Clinton was Secretary of State. A look at some of them is more than a little interesting. Because the list is so extensive, we will just show oil companies and defense contractors. This list shows companies in those categories that both donated to the Clinton foundation (along with the amount given), and lobbied the State Department.
Defense Contractors:
* Boeing: between $1 million and $5 million.
* Lockheed Martin: between $100,000 and $300,000.
Oil Companies
* Duke Energy Corporation: between $1 million and $5 million
* ExxonMobil: between $1 million and $5 million.
* Chevron: between $500,00 and $1 million
* Noble Energy: between $200,000 and $500.00.
* Hess Corporation: between $100,000 and $250,000.
And, as a bonus, the top three contributors:
* Microsoft/Gates Foundation: at least $26 million
* Walmart: between $2 million and $11 million.
* Coca-Cola: between $5million and $10 million.
When looking at this list, Mrs. Clintons vote in 2002 authorizing Mr. Bush to invade oil-rich Iraq is not terribly surprising.
What do we learn from this list? Perhaps it is obvious that few people, and certainly not the intelligent, savvy and crafty Mrs. Clinton, will bite the hands that so generously feed them. We must also speculate on what commitments and promises the illustrious Mrs. Clinton has made to her very generous benefactors. As a senator, she was in a position to introduce, co-sponsor and vote for laws favorable to them. As Secretary of State, she could lobby governments around the world for such laws. One can only imagine the power she would wield as president of the United States to benefit those who helped her purchase that office.
...
more: http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/05/01/hillary-clinton-elitist-imperialist-politician-extraordinaire/Unfortunately, we must, as voters and potential victims of a Hillary Clinton presidency, look back, forward and to the present. And it is that alarming present, put in context by the not-too-distant past, that should give everyone pause.
Mrs. Clinton either has, or is expected to raise, upwards of $2 billion dollars to purchase a four-year lease to the White House. She might wish the public to believe that hard-working United States citizens, toiling at the shop or office every day, are scraping together $5.00 and $10.00 donations, all of which, in total, achieves that $2 billion. However, such is not the case. Mrs. Clintons presidential campaign is being financed by the same organizations that fund her and her husbands charitable organization, and that list includes at least 118 individuals and companies that lobbied the State Department when Mrs. Clinton was Secretary of State. A look at some of them is more than a little interesting. Because the list is so extensive, we will just show oil companies and defense contractors. This list shows companies in those categories that both donated to the Clinton foundation (along with the amount given), and lobbied the State Department.
Defense Contractors:
* Boeing: between $1 million and $5 million.
* Lockheed Martin: between $100,000 and $300,000.
Oil Companies
* Duke Energy Corporation: between $1 million and $5 million
* ExxonMobil: between $1 million and $5 million.
* Chevron: between $500,00 and $1 million
* Noble Energy: between $200,000 and $500.00.
* Hess Corporation: between $100,000 and $250,000.
And, as a bonus, the top three contributors:
* Microsoft/Gates Foundation: at least $26 million
* Walmart: between $2 million and $11 million.
* Coca-Cola: between $5million and $10 million.
When looking at this list, Mrs. Clintons vote in 2002 authorizing Mr. Bush to invade oil-rich Iraq is not terribly surprising.
What do we learn from this list? Perhaps it is obvious that few people, and certainly not the intelligent, savvy and crafty Mrs. Clinton, will bite the hands that so generously feed them. We must also speculate on what commitments and promises the illustrious Mrs. Clinton has made to her very generous benefactors. As a senator, she was in a position to introduce, co-sponsor and vote for laws favorable to them. As Secretary of State, she could lobby governments around the world for such laws. One can only imagine the power she would wield as president of the United States to benefit those who helped her purchase that office.
...
70 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Hillary Clinton: Elitist, Imperialist, Politician Extraordinaire [View all]
Cheese Sandwich
Nov 2015
OP
Of course, all those nice corporations are investing..er..donating without an expectation
Tierra_y_Libertad
Nov 2015
#2
I was told right here on DU that they pay like this because she is just a really great speaker
Cheese Sandwich
Nov 2015
#6
that includes at least 118 individuals and companies that's lobbied the State Department....
hedda_foil
Nov 2015
#7
I am voting for HRC. Thank you for info that has been posted about 1000 times
leftofcool
Nov 2015
#9
Saying it's false isn't the same as providing proof against its veracity
EvolveOrConvolve
Nov 2015
#20
I think it would be incumbent upon the person who posted that stuff to provide "proof", don't you?
George II
Nov 2015
#22
I don't blame you for supporting Hillary. She has said time and time again that
A Simple Game
Nov 2015
#12
Got it. Being an elitist imperialist corporate collaborator is not a problem...
Cheese Sandwich
Nov 2015
#37
Posting smears of a Democratic candidate is helping the RW--and you know that.
riversedge
Nov 2015
#56
Thank you for the nice kind words, she is everything, also include smart,
Thinkingabout
Nov 2015
#30
It's not really a smear job if it's relevant and factual info mixed with some opinions
Cheese Sandwich
Nov 2015
#60