Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Fair pay for work Boomer Dec 2015 #1
Uh huh - like what? MaggieD Dec 2015 #4
Illegal? Armstead Dec 2015 #52
FYI merrily Dec 2015 #137
And nobody else would work that much for so little... Proserpina Dec 2015 #304
Agreed... Do The Math... These Relatives Were Paid PEANUTS! HillBill Crew grasping @ Straws CorporatistNation Dec 2015 #481
Disgusting!!! polly7 Dec 2015 #246
Why don't you tell them to "Cut it out!"? tecelote Dec 2015 #359
Yes. It's outrageous. He also "funneled" money to a grocery store, electric company, GoneFishin Dec 2015 #420
CLINTON FOUNDATION... Human101948 Dec 2015 #476
It's called a "conflict of interest" Bobbie Jo Dec 2015 #8
Like hiring your daughter to run your foundation? (nt) jeff47 Dec 2015 #87
Yeah Bobbie Jo Dec 2015 #119
FYI merrily Dec 2015 #138
Thank You! liberalnarb Dec 2015 #462
that's gotta burn nt grasswire Dec 2015 #410
so it is wrong Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #100
FYI merrily Dec 2015 #136
I doubt you can get Maggie to floriduck Dec 2015 #479
FYI merrily Dec 2015 #135
Spam Bobbie Jo Dec 2015 #140
Hi, Bobbie Jo. Changed your mind on Jim Hoft? Scootaloo Dec 2015 #313
Spam-ETA Bobbie Jo Dec 2015 #334
That's not an answer, Bobbie Jo Scootaloo Dec 2015 #399
Classic: George II Dec 2015 #442
Mustn't be "rude", Bobbie Jo! LOL.. who was Juror #5?! Cha Dec 2015 #458
Spam William769 Dec 2015 #435
Maps George II Dec 2015 #438
I agree rbrnmw Dec 2015 #439
I'm not sure I see the conflicting interests. What interests are in conflict here? eom yawnmaster Dec 2015 #478
FYI merrily Dec 2015 #134
Incomplete and misleading jehop61 Dec 2015 #2
You make a valid point still_one Dec 2015 #5
Nah, this shit should be illegal MaggieD Dec 2015 #6
Republican candidates also love to win. Should that be illegal as well? JonLeibowitz Dec 2015 #11
I find it unethical - don't you? MaggieD Dec 2015 #21
I don't know what to think -- I don't know if this is at all unusual. JonLeibowitz Dec 2015 #38
The real number to his wife is about $30,000 but $30K to buy $61K worth of ads? Hmmm. George II Dec 2015 #61
If she was able to competently execute the job, I see no issue. JonLeibowitz Dec 2015 #94
According to this lying source or according to a credible source? merrily Dec 2015 #142
Who is considered the "lying source", the author of the article? The article... George II Dec 2015 #161
Funny how sources matter all of the sudden, isn't it? MaggieD Dec 2015 #178
Very funny ..... polly7 Dec 2015 #183
Your own link says: Vattel Dec 2015 #424
FYI merrily Dec 2015 #141
In case you're interested Juicy_Bellows Dec 2015 #230
Thanks. Funny how the one juror who voted to hide gave no explanation. merrily Dec 2015 #233
cuz reasons! Juicy_Bellows Dec 2015 #235
Fascinating -- it was just a baseless smear the whole time. JonLeibowitz Dec 2015 #236
I don't think it was baseless, but it was most def a smear passiveporcupine Dec 2015 #323
She got taxpayer money too! MaggieD Dec 2015 #332
I didn't know the Sanders were rich passiveporcupine Dec 2015 #351
Well they make about $350K per year MaggieD Dec 2015 #352
Sorry Maggie passiveporcupine Dec 2015 #376
YES grasswire Dec 2015 #411
Wow!! That's more than 98% of all households in America. George II Dec 2015 #440
yes aren't you suppose to use a charity to funnel money instead? 2pooped2pop Dec 2015 #259
^This. We have to win. CanonRay Dec 2015 #12
Well he is a socialist.... (Sorry I couldn't resist) still_one Dec 2015 #3
FYI merrily Dec 2015 #144
Thanks, I an not surprised. My post was just tongue and cheek, not intended to be still_one Dec 2015 #187
Chuckle. riversedge Dec 2015 #169
Doesn't seem like much money over 15 years VMA131Marine Dec 2015 #7
4 years, not 15 MaggieD Dec 2015 #9
Precisely Maggie. Wtf! Again, bernie's campaign words fail to match his deeds. misterhighwasted Dec 2015 #14
Imagine if he hired his daughter to run his foundation. (nt) jeff47 Dec 2015 #115
Shhhhh! Politicalboi Dec 2015 #155
FYI merrily Dec 2015 #150
Oh, MaggieD... Oh dear... Scootaloo Dec 2015 #10
This same crap was tried before with discrediting R B Garr Dec 2015 #15
Think so? Scootaloo Dec 2015 #25
I'm saying that this is what so-called "progressives" R B Garr Dec 2015 #51
Oh cut the shit. Scootaloo Dec 2015 #64
That was.months ago. The website description R B Garr Dec 2015 #286
It was September, dude. And it's always been what it is. Scootaloo Dec 2015 #309
September WAS months ago, lol R B Garr Dec 2015 #386
I object to it when it's a piece of shit right-wing source Scootaloo Dec 2015 #395
All your points have been refuted in this thread R B Garr Dec 2015 #400
My point is that Jim Hoft is a right-wing teabagger, and Progressives Today reflects that Scootaloo Dec 2015 #401
So you and MaggieD gravitate toward right wing fucks, and you have the attention span of a gnat DisgustipatedinCA Dec 2015 #427
Sources only matter if they slam Bernie R B Garr Dec 2015 #434
Your needle is stuck in a crack. bvar22 Dec 2015 #463
You had to go ALL THE WAY BACK TO DEC 5th R B Garr Dec 2015 #464
There you go again. bvar22 Dec 2015 #473
My post is dated DECEMBER 5th, SEVENTEEN DAYS AGO R B Garr Dec 2015 #474
Have you changed you mind in 17 days? bvar22 Dec 2015 #475
LMFAO! Truth, my ass. Your post is nothing but R B Garr Dec 2015 #480
The hypocrisy and cognitive dissonance is amazing, isn't it? beam me up scottie Dec 2015 #441
That seems to be the case MaggieD Dec 2015 #67
So knowing that you are posting right wing garbage your defense is "but Timmy did it too". Warren Stupidity Dec 2015 #218
LOL - his campaign staff admitted it MaggieD Dec 2015 #231
fuck 2pooped2pop Dec 2015 #264
Nailed it again, Maggie! R B Garr Dec 2015 #301
At least I have enough ethics not to post a lie MaggieD Dec 2015 #302
Yeah, you never lie...... RichVRichV Dec 2015 #368
LAbeling this as money funneling is an outright lie passiveporcupine Dec 2015 #418
Didn't you get a post hidden the other day for saying "Bernie thinks women enjoy being raped"? beam me up scottie Dec 2015 #426
FYI merrily Dec 2015 #148
Most of what I read here about Hillary is made up. R B Garr Dec 2015 #294
Then, it should be easy to refute. merrily Dec 2015 #296
Hillary laughed. Hillary is evil. R B Garr Dec 2015 #305
If it's Hillary laughed at killing Gaddafi and Hillary laughed at the prospect of nuking Iran, merrily Dec 2015 #306
Now you see how so-called progressives and R B Garr Dec 2015 #387
And the OPer used the same tactic against an article criticle of Clinton Armstead Dec 2015 #66
It says "progressives". R B Garr Dec 2015 #288
You linked to the same racist tea party website/article: beam me up scottie Dec 2015 #425
Of course you don't take that in context, which was R B Garr Dec 2015 #436
What context? You went digging in the manure pile and found some shit. beam me up scottie Dec 2015 #437
You are hilarious. The article was from the Vermont R B Garr Dec 2015 #450
What are you on about now? What was I linking to at the time? beam me up scottie Dec 2015 #451
Ah, yes. Now confusion... R B Garr Dec 2015 #452
No, really, explain. You were called out for linking to a racist website. beam me up scottie Dec 2015 #453
Hilarious R B Garr Dec 2015 #454
So, linking to tea party website AND making false claims, got it! beam me up scottie Dec 2015 #456
Ah, I found the thread where you demanded I renounce something or other: beam me up scottie Dec 2015 #457
Nice catch. Ultra-RW source ESKD Dec 2015 #23
FYI merrily Dec 2015 #149
It's factually true MaggieD Dec 2015 #29
That's a doozy. ESKD Dec 2015 #33
You think his campaign chief of staff is lying? MaggieD Dec 2015 #226
From that link Jarqui Dec 2015 #385
In fact it's not, as others have pointed out to you before. Scootaloo Dec 2015 #39
So this is more credible than the right wing source you bashed? Armstead Dec 2015 #74
that will not happen with some Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #112
FYI merrily Dec 2015 #145
This was alerted. R B Garr Dec 2015 #13
The post survived by 3-4, which I think is the right result. Jim Lane Dec 2015 #18
Typical for DU - can't tell the unattractive truth about Bernie MaggieD Dec 2015 #22
K & R misterhighwasted Dec 2015 #65
Are you implying that unattractive truths about Hillary never get alerted on? Jim Lane Dec 2015 #104
LOL! You sure are funny Politicalboi Dec 2015 #164
Truth about Bernie hurts, I guess MaggieD Dec 2015 #189
No, it doesn't Politicalboi Dec 2015 #198
Seems so by looking at this thread - LOL! MaggieD Dec 2015 #201
Agree that the Jury System worked here. philly_bob Dec 2015 #132
So we can post hit pieces from Fox News? Really? Is that what we want here? rhett o rick Dec 2015 #291
Don't silence the idiots. Refute them. philly_bob Dec 2015 #445
Damn you you are using my own arguments against me. You are correct of course. rhett o rick Dec 2015 #449
The source has made up things about Sanders before. It's dishonest. merrily Dec 2015 #160
I think we are seeing the despiration showing. This is a very low blow that I hope rhett o rick Dec 2015 #293
K & R for TRUTH misterhighwasted Dec 2015 #16
UNBELIEVABLE: Democrats Agree To Prayer Service At Mosque WITH 9/11 CONNECTION TSIAS Dec 2015 #56
+100 jkbRN Dec 2015 #73
This OP is about bernie. Refute this OP first, then you can take on the other subjects. misterhighwasted Dec 2015 #147
somebody has a math problem Kali Dec 2015 #17
Campaign cash should NEVER be funneled into a candidates pocket MaggieD Dec 2015 #20
If you work for a campaign, especially SheilaT Dec 2015 #319
Wow, and he still reports a $800,000 net worth, what is happening there. Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #19
$800, 000 net worth? Does that include Jane's net worth also? misterhighwasted Dec 2015 #27
Oh my god! That's about the same as my dad's net worth who is >10 years younger JonLeibowitz Dec 2015 #50
I'm appalled that Sanders paid two family members less than a living wage over ten years ago. winter is coming Dec 2015 #63
Its not the how-much, its the how. misterhighwasted Dec 2015 #76
I flatly disagree, if he is paying others and this is relatively common practice, I see no issue. JonLeibowitz Dec 2015 #88
You just admitted you lack perspective. n/t Qutzupalotl Dec 2015 #107
lol.. well of course. From your perspective misterhighwasted Dec 2015 #154
Yes, last year it was $350,000 and then suddenly it is $800,000. After twenty five years Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #209
Worthy of question, in that case. misterhighwasted Dec 2015 #223
Hmm... workinclasszero Dec 2015 #83
Time to follow the money. Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #214
Oh yeah workinclasszero Dec 2015 #217
hoisted on his own petard redstateblues Dec 2015 #428
Hell of a source you link to Mags, this is another story on their front page right now: Bluenorthwest Dec 2015 #24
Is it not factually true? Well yes it is (nt) MaggieD Dec 2015 #30
The link I cited calls Democrats 'deranged' and you are saying this source is factually true? Bluenorthwest Dec 2015 #40
His campaign staff admitted it MaggieD Dec 2015 #228
How about his campaign staff - that a good enough source? MaggieD Dec 2015 #225
I'm ok with this. Did you answer above where the poster asked about the amount 2pooped2pop Dec 2015 #269
What your source says about Hillary is disgusting as well: Bluenorthwest Dec 2015 #26
HRC is irrelevant to this OP.This calls into question bernie from Vt. misterhighwasted Dec 2015 #42
The OP asks me to trust the source. When I looked at the source it smears Hillary and all Democrats Bluenorthwest Dec 2015 #84
Now, you would never post an article from a right-winger would you? jeff47 Dec 2015 #28
Yet the info is true - right? MaggieD Dec 2015 #31
How about their Hillary stories over there? Factual or presented with loaded right wing slant? Bluenorthwest Dec 2015 #34
Seems okay with Bernie supporters if it's a Hillary smear - right? MaggieD Dec 2015 #37
That's an absurdly evasive response. You are the one posting a source that smears both candidates Bluenorthwest Dec 2015 #45
It's an FACTUAL response MaggieD Dec 2015 #77
No it is not. It's evasive and so is this one CAPS and all. Why do you present this source as honest Bluenorthwest Dec 2015 #92
FYI merrily Dec 2015 #151
According to your complaints in that thread, your OP should be deleted instead of disputed. jeff47 Dec 2015 #43
.............. polly7 Dec 2015 #122
This message was self-deleted by its author polly7 Dec 2015 #123
FYI on progressivestoday. com and Sanders merrily Dec 2015 #162
Good that you started that thread, merrily. polly7 Dec 2015 #177
Yep. The defense of "facts" in a RW source that has lied about Sanders before and uses a link that merrily Dec 2015 #191
Funny how RW "facts" and smears about Hillary Skidmore Dec 2015 #397
No, I have not noticed anything posted here about Hillary from progressivetoday. merrily Dec 2015 #459
Aside from the lying source your OP cites, what makes you think the info is true? merrily Dec 2015 #157
Astonishing in a way.... Bluenorthwest Dec 2015 #32
Hey, if it's okay for Bernie supporters to site right wing sources.... MaggieD Dec 2015 #41
That's just false, I have never, ever linked to any right wing site and you need to stop with that Bluenorthwest Dec 2015 #55
Don't know if you have or not - but plenty of Bernie supporters do MaggieD Dec 2015 #57
Your edit does not change anything. I am an individual as are you. I don't give a flying fig what Bluenorthwest Dec 2015 #75
I didn't edit shit MaggieD Dec 2015 #81
Show me what I have done that bothers you? Hurling words becasue you can't defend this Bluenorthwest Dec 2015 #103
Show me where you've complained about sources used to smear Hillary MaggieD Dec 2015 #121
How is that my job? You are the one that accused me of wrongdoing when trying to excuse your Hillary Bluenorthwest Dec 2015 #287
That is the point. Skidmore Dec 2015 #398
Seems like a pretty minor thing to me. MineralMan Dec 2015 #35
I don't think it's minor MaggieD Dec 2015 #44
Frankly, I have no problem with family members holding MineralMan Dec 2015 #49
I have two questions before I could call it corruption. RichVRichV Dec 2015 #383
Excellent. Those are the relevant questions. Vattel Dec 2015 #402
Not only minor but likely false. merrily Dec 2015 #168
I don't care, either way. MineralMan Dec 2015 #184
Not surprising. merrily Dec 2015 #207
He cares so little, he just haaaaad to pop in to tell us just how little he cares... opiate69 Dec 2015 #255
right wingers hate Sanders. hard to believe Doctor_J Dec 2015 #36
It's factually true MaggieD Dec 2015 #47
According to which credible source? The source in your OP has lied about Sanders before. merrily Dec 2015 #165
The FEC MaggieD Dec 2015 #196
Really? Where are links to the relevant FEC filings? merrily Dec 2015 #202
Please put your mother on the post Politicalboi Dec 2015 #193
I'm told repubs are voting for bernie. misterhighwasted Dec 2015 #48
This sources has flat out lied about Sanders before. merrily Dec 2015 #171
Since when are racist site allowed ? Truprogressive85 Dec 2015 #46
This OP has nothing to do with racism. misterhighwasted Dec 2015 #53
It's a right wing source that smears Hillary, Bernie, other elected and all other Democrats. Bluenorthwest Dec 2015 #59
excuse me ? Truprogressive85 Dec 2015 #72
So tell me how does it work again? Shall I list the RW sources misterhighwasted Dec 2015 #127
So you ok with racism by the site ? Truprogressive85 Dec 2015 #133
This is about bernies questionable campaign cash. misterhighwasted Dec 2015 #170
Since Bernie supporters have been using right wing sites to smear Hillary MaggieD Dec 2015 #54
So you are ok with using website that a racist is behind Truprogressive85 Dec 2015 #79
Cut the shit, maggieD Scootaloo Dec 2015 #80
We don't need right wing sites to smear Hillary Politicalboi Dec 2015 #203
Source has lied about Sanders in the past and is likely lying again. merrily Dec 2015 #174
You keep trumpeting the "truth" of this right wing racist propagandist... last1standing Dec 2015 #58
Btw, what's Chelsea Clinton's salary from the Clinton Foundation? (nt) jeff47 Dec 2015 #60
The source mention in this bullshit story takes me to a download for 'We Wish You a Merry Crhistmas. Agnosticsherbet Dec 2015 #62
The info is factually correct MaggieD Dec 2015 #71
You claim the source is reputable and to be trusted to present facts. Most of us do not agree with Bluenorthwest Dec 2015 #82
The info is factually correct MaggieD Dec 2015 #89
Post a link that takes me to the factually correct information other than this bullshit retelling. Agnosticsherbet Dec 2015 #97
I already posted a link MaggieD Dec 2015 #101
I'm just wondering how he was able to write his campaign a $1 million dollar check. BlueCaliDem Dec 2015 #68
He used lots of PAC donations to run for Senate MaggieD Dec 2015 #99
I never knew that. But the irony is, he accepted $10 grand from none other than HillPAC, BlueCaliDem Dec 2015 #118
This source cited in the OP lies about Sanders merrily Dec 2015 #176
Does Vermont's Times Argus newspaper lie, too? BlueCaliDem Dec 2015 #234
progressivetoday has lied about Sanders in the past and claims merrily Dec 2015 #238
Yes, words matter, and they purposely used the nefarious sounding BlueCaliDem Dec 2015 #249
Since this source has lied about Sanders in the past, no one should take its word for anything. merrily Dec 2015 #256
What the hell........................................... workinclasszero Dec 2015 #69
This message was self-deleted by its author last1standing Dec 2015 #91
Should be easy to confirm with his FEC filings. hrmjustin Dec 2015 #70
Uh isn't this illegal? workinclasszero Dec 2015 #78
Sadly no MaggieD Dec 2015 #85
I'm still waiting for you to prove your OP isn't a right wing lie. last1standing Dec 2015 #98
LOL - okey dokey MaggieD Dec 2015 #106
You're spreading rightwing propaganda for the sole purpose of smearing progressives. last1standing Dec 2015 #111
Oh that's right, you don't know what "Google" means, don't you? ESKD Dec 2015 #317
Indeed I do MaggieD Dec 2015 #324
It's true because they worked for them and get paid just like any other workers ESKD Dec 2015 #328
It's okay if it's Bernie MaggieD Dec 2015 #329
You are talking about 60,000 over fifteen years. ESKD Dec 2015 #331
Nope - he hired her on his congressional staff as well MaggieD Dec 2015 #333
Yet you failed to see the part where "Jane Sanders refused to take on a salary as CoS" ESKD Dec 2015 #336
Well its still unethical workinclasszero Dec 2015 #120
Yeah...almost looks as bad as paying your daughter a 6 figure salary from your charity. (nt) jeff47 Dec 2015 #446
What? Posting right wing propaganda with no verification on DU? last1standing Dec 2015 #93
Nope. You are free to hire family members. And given the numbers involved, he underpaid them. jeff47 Dec 2015 #109
Imagine him with a charitable foundation, with donations from lobbyists, in the millions! immoderate Dec 2015 #86
And then hiring his own daughter to run that foundation. (nt) jeff47 Dec 2015 #110
That would be — scandalous! immoderate Dec 2015 #139
sounds smart to hire family as staff. larkrake Dec 2015 #90
Assuming it's true. Not necessarily a sound assumption. merrily Dec 2015 #179
If they did the work and it was valued at that amount treestar Dec 2015 #95
Progressives Today is a RW site that has lied about Sanders before. merrily Dec 2015 #96
Just look at their front page, it's all right wing trash Cheese Sandwich Dec 2015 #102
I know. I just posted an OP exposing this source. This thread is shameful. merrily Dec 2015 #124
Its much more than just RW trash Truprogressive85 Dec 2015 #131
Vile. nt. polly7 Dec 2015 #166
I don't think you want to go there regarding family finances and how people get money Armstead Dec 2015 #105
OP is a right wing lie that the poster refuses to delete! last1standing Dec 2015 #108
Yep. And it will be very handy to bring this up again every single time this poster jeff47 Dec 2015 #113
No worries- Bernie supporters have convinced me the source doesn't matter! MaggieD Dec 2015 #116
It is factually true - sorry MaggieD Dec 2015 #114
You have posted rightwing, out of context lies. last1standing Dec 2015 #117
No, it's factually true MaggieD Dec 2015 #156
Will you post their racist articles here as well? last1standing Dec 2015 #172
It's factually true MaggieD Dec 2015 #182
Why would I believe someone who posts right wing lies? last1standing Dec 2015 #197
Did you know that most people who post right wing lies are right wing shitstains? DisgustipatedinCA Dec 2015 #220
I've seen nothing from the poster of this OP that contradicts your post. last1standing Dec 2015 #227
His campaign staff admitted it MaggieD Dec 2015 #244
Here's a Bernie supporter this morning MaggieD Dec 2015 #318
Did you know that most people who post right wing lies are right wing shitstains? DisgustipatedinCA Dec 2015 #322
............. polly7 Dec 2015 #125
Factually Bernie Sanders employed family members in his campaign azurnoir Dec 2015 #128
I doubt they did any real work MaggieD Dec 2015 #159
And your evidentiary basis for that vile smear is what, exactly? (n/t) Jim Lane Dec 2015 #204
Is that a new rule? MaggieD Dec 2015 #290
Your standard of intellectual honesty, or lack thereof, is duly noted. Jim Lane Dec 2015 #367
Sometimes one needs to use an example to make a point MaggieD Dec 2015 #375
I'm saving my popcorn for the big event that's imminent. Jim Lane Dec 2015 #384
......... polly7 Dec 2015 #282
bring your doubts up with FEC because essentially you're accusing Bernie Sanders of fraud azurnoir Dec 2015 #285
His campaign staff admitted it MaggieD Dec 2015 #303
thanks for the 2005 article that states he hired family members to work for his campaign azurnoir Dec 2015 #316
True. Unwanted attention. Really exposes for who she is. ESKD Dec 2015 #325
Read the About page of Progressives Today. madfloridian Dec 2015 #126
look at this shit that they post Truprogressive85 Dec 2015 #153
it's "the gateway pundit" wingnut "exposing progressives" yeah, nice source. nt m-lekktor Dec 2015 #173
Janie enid602 Dec 2015 #129
This message was self-deleted by its author Eric J in MN Dec 2015 #130
4 years, not 15 MaggieD Dec 2015 #146
This message was self-deleted by its author Eric J in MN Dec 2015 #163
How much has Hillary given her family????? Politicalboi Dec 2015 #143
The source in the OP has lied about Sanders before and seems to be lying again. merrily Dec 2015 #192
His campaign staff admitted it MaggieD Dec 2015 #232
And ......... your thoughts on this? polly7 Dec 2015 #243
The HRC supporters... deathrind Dec 2015 #152
its OK; its not Hillary ericson00 Dec 2015 #158
Yep - and I'm getting a real kick out the sources complaints MaggieD Dec 2015 #175
LOL. polly7 Dec 2015 #180
This source does not seem appreciate for DU. hrmjustin Dec 2015 #167
It's a rightwing, discredited source, for an incredulous -- and now discredited -- OP villager Dec 2015 #181
It's factually true MaggieD Dec 2015 #185
.......... polly7 Dec 2015 #190
Heh. I guess sauce for the goose *isn't* sauce for the gander, in this instance villager Dec 2015 #341
Did it? Your source claims the info came from the Vermont Guardian, but that claim seems to be crap. merrily Dec 2015 #195
FEC MaggieD Dec 2015 #206
That's fom your lying source that links to a song. Where are the links to the relevant FEC filings? merrily Dec 2015 #211
His campaign staff admitted it MaggieD Dec 2015 #241
$30,000 for 3 years, which seem to be commissions on ad buys, and $65,000 for 5 years. Wowza! merrily Dec 2015 #260
But, but, but.... MaggieD Dec 2015 #261
Well it took you long enough to come up with a source that wasn't polly7 Dec 2015 #271
I said the source lied about Sanders in the past. merrily Dec 2015 #289
LOL - ok! MaggieD Dec 2015 #292
$150,000 in 15 years? Kentonio Dec 2015 #379
That is a good point.Sanders supporters use rw material to trash Hillary all the time. hrmjustin Dec 2015 #212
And they do it in the name of "progressives" R B Garr Dec 2015 #265
Good to see you and good to be back. hrmjustin Dec 2015 #396
Sure was fun to watch them object -- all of the sudden MaggieD Dec 2015 #279
His wife got 15K for each of two campaigns. Not an excessive amount. Eric J in MN Dec 2015 #186
How do we know what his wife got, if anything? merrily Dec 2015 #199
There is confirmation in Roll Call Eric J in MN Dec 2015 #221
His wife got 30K over 3 years and, per argus, that appears to be commissions for ad buys. merrily Dec 2015 #268
Well, and he hired her at tax payer expense as well MaggieD Dec 2015 #200
I think it funny as hell that Bernie fans are all of a sudden worried about sources workinclasszero Dec 2015 #188
Yes. it is amusing MaggieD Dec 2015 #194
So you ok with the source ? good to know Truprogressive85 Dec 2015 #205
FEC is a good source, right? MaggieD Dec 2015 #208
Here's a Bernie supporter post using right wing sources MaggieD Dec 2015 #327
You stand by the racist site as you posted as your source ? Truprogressive85 Dec 2015 #337
I stand by his campaign staff admitting it's true MaggieD Dec 2015 #338
So are prouldy posted a linked started by a racist Truprogressive85 Dec 2015 #340
Sure - why not? Bernie supporters have no problem when it is used to smear Hillary MaggieD Dec 2015 #342
Thanks for letting me know Truprogressive85 Dec 2015 #349
How about the Times Argus? MaggieD Dec 2015 #350
That could been used but instead you choose to use the racist site Truprogressive85 Dec 2015 #361
Nope - read the OP again MaggieD Dec 2015 #363
This OP is nothing more than a Rovian hit piece. Good Job! TheBlackAdder Dec 2015 #210
So prove what they were paid for their work then with an official source and numbers, polly7 Dec 2015 #213
In 2008, Hillary Clinton paid millions to Mark Penn's consulting agency. Eric J in MN Dec 2015 #215
Weird. I used to think of Lee Atwater as a propagandizing, lying piece of dogshit. DisgustipatedinCA Dec 2015 #216
His campaign staff admitted it MaggieD Dec 2015 #229
Think harder, Maggie. You'll get there. DisgustipatedinCA Dec 2015 #315
The Clinton Foundation ran up about a $40 million Jarqui Dec 2015 #219
The 2016 race has demonstrated that running for president is a great way to enrich yourself. Renew Deal Dec 2015 #222
More sources...Confirmed by his campaign MaggieD Dec 2015 #224
What about this part? polly7 Dec 2015 #240
The republicans would have a field day workinclasszero Dec 2015 #321
who brought the popcorn dlwickham Dec 2015 #237
I know, right? MaggieD Dec 2015 #239
I love it when the bern bots lose their collective minds dlwickham Dec 2015 #250
Yep MaggieD Dec 2015 #253
Like this?!? polly7 Dec 2015 #258
I love when HillShills stir up shit TSIAS Dec 2015 #308
y'all can dish it out dlwickham Dec 2015 #432
No kidding! leftofcool Dec 2015 #311
His stepdaughter's "highest income for any of those years was about $20,400." Eric J in MN Dec 2015 #242
LOL - okey dokey MaggieD Dec 2015 #245
I'd say this was a pretty good investment for 0 dollars. polly7 Dec 2015 #247
Yes. We should be grateful to The Sanders for saving taxpayers money. NT Eric J in MN Dec 2015 #252
Strange MaggieD keeps ignoring that bit of the news article. nt. polly7 Dec 2015 #254
Do you have any evidence she did less than $20,400 worth of work? NT Eric J in MN Dec 2015 #248
I think any amount is unethical MaggieD Dec 2015 #262
Was it ethical for Hillary Clinton to take $3 million in speaking fees from financial organzations Eric J in MN Dec 2015 #380
Actually, your OP basically says as much. It's a nothingburger. reformist2 Dec 2015 #257
Do you work for free? nt. polly7 Dec 2015 #251
If they paid her what she was worth.... opiate69 Dec 2015 #263
!! polly7 Dec 2015 #266
Hire family & trusted friends first, if there are paid positions to fill and they can do the work. Sunlei Dec 2015 #267
Remind me again how much HILLARY pays her advisors? Fearless Dec 2015 #270
What does that have to do with funneling campaign cash to family members? MaggieD Dec 2015 #272
Why are you posting articles by tea party members? Fearless Dec 2015 #274
Because I wanted to convert Bernie supporters on the use of right wing sources MaggieD Dec 2015 #277
Seriously? When you feel like helping the average American Fearless Dec 2015 #280
Every post I've read of yours since June has been teabaggish . orpupilofnature57 Dec 2015 #283
I bet you say that to all the Hillary supporters - LOL! MaggieD Dec 2015 #295
I don't subscribe to " Right wing " sources, but I do listen to Amy Goodman when I can, and Yes orpupilofnature57 Dec 2015 #430
Such intent would imply an intelligence which I would bet dollars to doughnuts you lack. opiate69 Dec 2015 #284
Funneling? polly7 Dec 2015 #275
They're not interested in facts, only their agenda. Fearless Dec 2015 #276
Actually, the better question is how much she pays her daughter from the Clinton Foundation. jeff47 Dec 2015 #447
In the slimy world of politics, I'd trust family members before anyone else. Skwmom Dec 2015 #273
It's okay if it's Bernie MaggieD Dec 2015 #320
Left the Whitehouse in debt,The Clinton Foundation, Blackwater, Please . orpupilofnature57 Dec 2015 #278
275 Replys, 15 Recs, shows where this ploy is going !!! orpupilofnature57 Dec 2015 #281
It's Swiftboating. nm rhett o rick Dec 2015 #298
How so? It's true. MaggieD Dec 2015 #300
I'm enjoying it MaggieD Dec 2015 #299
This message was self-deleted by its author rhett o rick Dec 2015 #297
You should stop posting this crap MaggieD Matariki Dec 2015 #307
Nope his campaign staff admitted it MaggieD Dec 2015 #326
Nope, it's a non-issue. I don't believe you hate Sanders as much as your posts seem to indicate Matariki Dec 2015 #330
it is somewhat weirdly obsessive and projection-laden villager Dec 2015 #343
+1 darkangel218 Dec 2015 #344
So why are Bernie supporters so upset about it? MaggieD Dec 2015 #345
One one word to describe it. ESKD Dec 2015 #405
too tired to cuttenpaste, here's their Tweets MisterP Dec 2015 #310
So it looks like the wife got $10,000 a year and the daughter got $13,000 a year. Vinca Dec 2015 #312
The GOP would have fun with this if Sanders was the nominee Gothmog Dec 2015 #314
Yeah...underpaying his family is a fantastic angle for them. jeff47 Dec 2015 #448
All I want to know is why isn't Bernie in jail. Kalidurga Dec 2015 #335
No, I know it's not illegal MaggieD Dec 2015 #358
Yet no problem when Hillary does it. Kalidurga Dec 2015 #362
Well we can see it here that it must be, right? MaggieD Dec 2015 #364
Why would I need to read the thread again? Kalidurga Dec 2015 #370
Okey Dokey MaggieD Dec 2015 #371
Question - will you be voting for Sanders if he's the Democratic candidate? Matariki Dec 2015 #339
Nah. He's not a Democrat MaggieD Dec 2015 #347
You are ridiculous. Agschmid Dec 2015 #354
He won't be the nominee MaggieD Dec 2015 #356
Yah well hopefully you are doing more than being a keyboard warrior. Agschmid Dec 2015 #357
So, what then? You'll sit the election out? Matariki Dec 2015 #431
Bullshit! sonofspy777 Dec 2015 #346
His campaign staff admitted it MaggieD Dec 2015 #348
And the lying horseshit continues. TM99 Dec 2015 #353
Nope - his campaign admitted it MaggieD Dec 2015 #355
I love this OP! artislife Dec 2015 #360
No way. Bernie is perfect with angel wings on his back. Liberal_in_LA Dec 2015 #365
Look at all the folks rec'ing an op that links to a racist right wing website. beam me up scottie Dec 2015 #366
The Times Argus is not a racist right wing site MaggieD Dec 2015 #369
I encourage everyone to go to progressivestoday.com and read what they say about our President. beam me up scottie Dec 2015 #372
I encourage you to get as upset when Bernie supporters do it MaggieD Dec 2015 #373
Why are you citing a racist right wing website on DU? beam me up scottie Dec 2015 #374
Post removed Post removed Dec 2015 #390
So you're proud of driving traffic to that website, after everything they wrote about Obama. beam me up scottie Dec 2015 #392
The since hidden post makes the agenda clear TSIAS Dec 2015 #403
Exactly, several of them are on timeouts for the same kind of behaviour. beam me up scottie Dec 2015 #406
...^ that 840high Dec 2015 #404
what a disingenuous line of crap that is. Why do you read such Tea Bagging, Democrat hating sites? Bluenorthwest Dec 2015 #388
I don't read them MaggieD Dec 2015 #389
But you link to racist websites anyway, just to score points. beam me up scottie Dec 2015 #407
That's just a load of crap you made up when you got busted for your Democrat bashing racist source. Bluenorthwest Dec 2015 #408
Silly left lowrider Dec 2015 #377
It is a common practice by Democrats and Republicans. It not illegal and not unethical. Turn CO Blue Dec 2015 #378
SOme more recent headlines from the OP's source Doctor_J Dec 2015 #381
Nah, those aren't from the Times Argus MaggieD Dec 2015 #391
This is silly mythology Dec 2015 #382
Maggied, you are the master. Well played. William769 Dec 2015 #393
You're congratulating her for making money for a racist/homophobic website? beam me up scottie Dec 2015 #409
The Barre Montpelier Times Argus newspaper/website is racist/homophobic? William769 Dec 2015 #413
The headlines I just posted are from progressivestoday, the link in the op - but you knew that. beam me up scottie Dec 2015 #415
Then you agree with this one then. William769 Dec 2015 #416
The racists teabaggers at that site thank the op and everyone who rec'd it for your patronage. beam me up scottie Dec 2015 #419
Remember the website that Bill runs Scootaloo Dec 2015 #443
Exactly. Lots of money to be made in that business. beam me up scottie Dec 2015 #444
Interesting site! Babel_17 Dec 2015 #394
What about this part? Vattel Dec 2015 #412
Your objections have been refuted in this thread R B Garr Dec 2015 #414
You linked to the same racist tea party website: beam me up scottie Dec 2015 #421
This message was self-deleted by its author GoneFishin Dec 2015 #417
interesting how this works. millions don't count yet suspect thousands do. Menshunables Dec 2015 #422
To call it funneling makes it a smear. You are very slimy. Vattel Dec 2015 #423
Poetry, Platitudes, and character assault, anything but an issue . orpupilofnature57 Dec 2015 #429
The blood of one million Iraqis still drip, drip drips from KingCharlemagne Dec 2015 #433
YOUR ATTEMPT TO MANUFACTURE MORE BULLSHIT IS NOTED AND EXPECTED MrMickeysMom Dec 2015 #455
^^ this nt artislife Dec 2015 #465
Why bump? George II Dec 2015 #468
*sigh* Maggie.... zigby Dec 2015 #460
Sounds to me like he just paid them as campaign workers. liberalnarb Dec 2015 #461
This is someone who also said that they would support Trump over Sen. Sanders: Douglas Carpenter Dec 2015 #466
Where did she say she would support Trump over Sanders? Where did she even MENTION Trump? George II Dec 2015 #467
she has more than once - but you know that Douglas Carpenter Dec 2015 #471
Not in the post that you used as your "example". But you knew that. I think.... George II Dec 2015 #472
John F. Kennedy hired his younger brother to be Attorney General Douglas Carpenter Dec 2015 #469
Hillary will lose. PowerToThePeople Dec 2015 #470
Good you are not a Sanders supporter Jeroen Dec 2015 #477
I worked for my dad's company for fifteen years. Wanta say something about that? Hiraeth Dec 2015 #482
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie funneled campaign ...»Reply #336