See, if you actually read the posts, you'll note I never said TPA's passage was her fault. That's the strawman you desperately keep trying to set up.

Instead, I've always talked about Clinton refusing to comment on the TPP until she can have no effect on its passage. That her opposition is nothing but theater designed to fool you.


So...she has utterly zero understanding of how government works?

Because if she understood how government work and actually felt that the TPP did not meet her standards, why would she keep quiet until after it was guaranteed to pass?

"It just wouldn't be prudent for me to speak up when I could stop this large disaster, so I waited until it was inevitable to say anything" is what you are claiming.

As something positive for Clinton. That she intentionally let something bad happen because she didn't want to ruffle any feathers.

Or she's clueless on how government works.

Which would you like? Clueless or lets bad things happen to keep the proper appearances?