Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Hillary Clinton Faces Call for New Ethics Investigation After Son-in-Law Asked for a Business Favor [View all]AzDar
(14,023 posts)111. It seems the Clintons are still covered in a fine slime that they just can't wash off...
Gah! No THANKS.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
163 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hillary Clinton Faces Call for New Ethics Investigation After Son-in-Law Asked for a Business Favor [View all]
Attorney in Texas
Dec 2015
OP
You ask "Why don't you tell us some good things about Bernie"? Perhaps you have noticed that Sanders
Attorney in Texas
Dec 2015
#97
I remember a thread where bernie had lunch with Killer Mike and Hillaries shit on it
roguevalley
Dec 2015
#118
She is going to be Madam President and there isn't a damn thing you can do about it.
upaloopa
Dec 2015
#124
Horse hockey. Bernie has a history of getting things done. This shit will not fly
Vincardog
Dec 2015
#11
To which of the over 6000 bills, he sponsored or cosponsored, are you refering?
Vincardog
Dec 2015
#35
I see the confusion now. I asked you for a specific example, and you gave me a count.
Buzz Clik
Dec 2015
#53
I gave you a link to 6144 bills he sponsored or cosponsored in reply to you post that HCR got more
Vincardog
Dec 2015
#98
Does not need to be. He is the master of the amendment process. He knows how to get things
JDPriestly
Dec 2015
#81
He wrote substantive bills and amendments that passed. Hillary passed a few ceremonial ones.
merrily
Dec 2015
#54
Maybe you should search the bills he got passed, his was also ceremonial ones.
Thinkingabout
Dec 2015
#84
BS. Veteran's benefits are not "ceremonial." Neither is community access to health care.
merrily
Dec 2015
#89
He has been in Congress for twenty five years, Hillary was only there for
Thinkingabout
Dec 2015
#130
EIGHT YEARS without a single substantive bill or amendment or other accomplishment.
merrily
Dec 2015
#131
Hey, you want to say whatever you want about Hillary, it is not changing facts.
Thinkingabout
Dec 2015
#133
I am not the one trying to change the facts about Hillary. EIGHT YEARS, no substantive bill or
merrily
Dec 2015
#135
Yawn. Anyone can make any conclusory comment. Hillary has been on the scene much longer.
merrily
Dec 2015
#38
So you argue that clinton would have more support from a more conservative congress?
Scootaloo
Dec 2015
#18
I never mentioned Clinton's name in that context. That is all your invention.
Buzz Clik
Dec 2015
#36
No, but you attack Sanders on the premise that he will not gain cooperation from congress
Scootaloo
Dec 2015
#39
You do understand that Obama's inability to secure approval of dozens of federal judges slots...
Buzz Clik
Dec 2015
#74
I said it was close, not equivalent. I also gave you the opportunity to clarify:
Buzz Clik
Dec 2015
#69
I know you meant well, but Bernie's done better than Hillary as far as getting things done (a) in
merrily
Dec 2015
#52
investigating is all they know how to do so they will investigate bernie (excpt they wont have to
saturnsring
Dec 2015
#88
Very interesting. And her husband and likely the current president. I guess lawyers can be anything
Ed Suspicious
Dec 2015
#75
It wasn't tongue in cheek until you got reminded Hillary and Bill are lawyers. But that was obvious.
merrily
Dec 2015
#147
And then she defended utility companies against residential rate-payers in Little Rock.
Art_from_Ark
Dec 2015
#123
Gotta ask you, Ace: Did you miss this story the first few times it was posted here?
Buzz Clik
Dec 2015
#8
She faces a "call" for a new probe? For fuck's sake, pubes call for all kinds of shit
Darb
Dec 2015
#14
It will be interesting to see how Sanders fairs with explaining how his net worth
Thinkingabout
Dec 2015
#37
How do you even know his income this year? Has he filed his tax returns for 2015 prematurely?
merrily
Dec 2015
#42
That was not the question I asked you. But, you knew that. You stated income this year of $800,000
merrily
Dec 2015
#91
Again, not what I asked. Where are you getting the $800.000 figure for this year?
merrily
Dec 2015
#122
There is a difference in net worth and income. One can have inome without
Thinkingabout
Dec 2015
#132
You might have a point here, it was reported $350,000 net worth last year
Thinkingabout
Dec 2015
#148
If you can't link to where I said $800,000 income because I did not. Bye again.
Thinkingabout
Dec 2015
#142
Replies 122 and 140 did not mention "income." You're pretending not to know what "whatever" means.
merrily
Dec 2015
#143
It was only a few months ago when his low net worth was considered a bad thing.
arcane1
Dec 2015
#102
The bigger problem for Hillary here is likely to be the perception of a pattern
Jarqui
Dec 2015
#107
Exactly! Clinton supporters wish to ignore her negative dishonesty/untrustworthiness rating when
Attorney in Texas
Dec 2015
#108
It seems the Clintons are still covered in a fine slime that they just can't wash off...
AzDar
Dec 2015
#111
State Dept already said she neither met with him nor did any one else from the State Dept...
Historic NY
Dec 2015
#158