Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

rocktivity

(44,555 posts)
105. It tells me that Wasserman-Schultz CAN BE ACCUSED of a political smear job
Sat Dec 19, 2015, 10:49 PM
Dec 2015

And THAT'S why she needs to resign.

Because she was one of Hillary's previous presidential campaign managers, every breath she takes SHOULD be scrutinized for possible bias in favor of Hillary. We need to have complete confidence and trust in our party's electoral process, and regardless of your opinion of her, she cannot provide it.


rocktivity

I've seen no evidence of a crime. It was a hill shill hit job. morningfog Dec 2015 #1
+1000 Segami Dec 2015 #30
And just before a presidential debate FreakinDJ Dec 2015 #82
+1. The point was to move the dial on Bernie's "trustworthy" numbers. winter is coming Dec 2015 #43
Bingo! Segami Dec 2015 #51
That was my first thought. Enthusiast Dec 2015 #69
all the trust DWS has lost will start to translate into declining trust in Clinton... Betty Karlson Dec 2015 #84
DWS & HRC are now eternally joined at the hip. Segami Dec 2015 #87
Clinton can always be trusted to do the right thing - Betty Karlson Dec 2015 #122
That's my take on it too. They hate the fact that the man azmom Dec 2015 #63
I'm thoroughly disgusted with her. Fantastic Anarchist Dec 2015 #85
Why did Sanders fire people and apologize? Renew Deal Dec 2015 #126
Post removed Post removed Dec 2015 #2
The nice thing about the legal process is it dispense with a lot of bullshit. highprincipleswork Dec 2015 #7
You will get your wish according to some sources. Karma13612 Dec 2015 #33
I'll be having chocolate mint covered grahm cracker cookies notadmblnd Dec 2015 #55
Homemade Recipe? PADemD Dec 2015 #92
No the pharmacy hands out gift wrapped boxes every Xmas when you get your prescriptions filled notadmblnd Dec 2015 #95
too funny!!! love your user name! eom Karma13612 Dec 2015 #130
Thanks, I think I've had this screen name since WINDOZE 95 was out. notadmblnd Dec 2015 #135
Oh those sound absolutely yummy! Have one and nod in my direction! eom Karma13612 Dec 2015 #94
As soon as the Sander's campaign filed a law suit the DNC backed down. Warren Stupidity Dec 2015 #3
The DNC's actions in the face of a court case speak louder than words Jarqui Dec 2015 #11
THIS!! +100000 Fawke Em Dec 2015 #22
you just make too much sense. dana_b Dec 2015 #76
A-freakin'-men! dgibby Dec 2015 #80
Especially since it was a CLEARLY losing one for the DNC Scootaloo Dec 2015 #56
I agree. Looks like the vendor did not secure the data properly. JDPriestly Dec 2015 #115
Damn right katsy Dec 2015 #4
6 people ran 24 queries on HRC's data, saved results Gman Dec 2015 #5
If a crime was committed why did the DNC go to the press instead of to law enforcement? Bjorn Against Dec 2015 #6
Because this was all about politics and public perception, not law n/t Fumesucker Dec 2015 #8
Exactly, but I don't think that public perception thing worked out quite the way they intended it to Bjorn Against Dec 2015 #9
My impression of the DNC and DWS Fumesucker Dec 2015 #10
.seriously. Nt Voice for Peace Dec 2015 #13
Precisely. senz Dec 2015 #17
There is no allegation that Sanders campaign broke or hacked Hillary's data but rather that JDPriestly Dec 2015 #117
And why would Bernie floriduck Dec 2015 #73
Because this is all in the family . And they seem to be the adults. It's bad enough.... PosterChild Dec 2015 #100
The claim that results were saved is in dispute. concreteblue Dec 2015 #18
Have you seen what they named the queries? Fawke Em Dec 2015 #31
Everybody's fault BUT the Sanders campaign Gman Dec 2015 #66
Well, as I'm sure you know by now, dgibby Dec 2015 #81
Doesn't rule out a screen capture and then OCR Gman Dec 2015 #83
What you are saying is beyond ridiculous. BeanMusical Dec 2015 #98
Really? Gman Dec 2015 #101
Really. BeanMusical Dec 2015 #102
Bernghazi!!!!!1 cui bono Dec 2015 #112
They were probing the vulnerability of the data they should not be accessing Samantha Dec 2015 #74
Thanks for that info. I'm just getting caught up with this and it was very helpful. cui bono Dec 2015 #113
You are welcome - this is going to be one of those deals you have follow closely for the duration Samantha Dec 2015 #119
Thanks Fawke Em!!! Fed up in NJ Dec 2015 #104
Thank you. JDPriestly Dec 2015 #118
They even set up two new accounts in order to access more data. George II Dec 2015 #97
Or to test.... Delver Rootnose Dec 2015 #128
Bottom line, a day later now, and Sanders apologized - APOLOGIZED PUBLICLY! If it was..... George II Dec 2015 #133
The vendor did not properly protect the security of the data. JDPriestly Dec 2015 #116
The vender did not make them access data Gman Dec 2015 #131
very true. But, the news media is keeping it very vague and UN- Karma13612 Dec 2015 #132
From whence comes that information? chervilant Dec 2015 #136
Dunno, she looked pretty damn good last night Gman Dec 2015 #138
Duty? The only duties DWS has is getting Hillary elected and making sure other Democrats lose. Scuba Dec 2015 #12
She has a good track record awoke_in_2003 Dec 2015 #27
Maybe because she's really trying to help the other party win? erronis Dec 2015 #37
Yep awoke_in_2003 Dec 2015 #46
Not Hillary. Scootaloo Dec 2015 #58
Oh, I'm sure Hillary is exactly the kind of politician DWS wants to see win elections. Scuba Dec 2015 #71
I'm not entirely sold that clinton wants ot be that politician, though Scootaloo Dec 2015 #72
Thank You For Sharing These Truths cantbeserious Dec 2015 #14
She's a hack and she serves a hack senz Dec 2015 #15
I agree in the strongest terms. avaistheone1 Dec 2015 #61
Huge +1! Enthusiast Dec 2015 #70
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Dec 2015 #16
Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2015 #19
Why did she go to the press without doing an audit? Bjorn Against Dec 2015 #23
Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2015 #28
The audit probably won't be complete until Dec. 2016. Fuddnik Dec 2015 #25
And it's also a self-audit. Fawke Em Dec 2015 #45
Wouldn't that be for the courts to decide? How can they judge something if it is not reported? Hiraeth Dec 2015 #35
I also know they didn't hire a third party security company to gather info, either. Fawke Em Dec 2015 #20
Yeah - and includes the some of the same people that helped SOS Hil set up her "private" server erronis Dec 2015 #41
Thank you. K&R Hiraeth Dec 2015 #21
Of course she went to the press. This was a hit job carried out for Hillary Rodham Fucking Clinton. Still In Wisconsin Dec 2015 #24
Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2015 #29
We can't help you if you don't want to see it. Fawke Em Dec 2015 #48
heavens, I didn't know about Karma13612 Dec 2015 #62
did you know: Karma13612 Dec 2015 #60
thank you for posting this info. hopemountain Dec 2015 #114
same here. eom #FeeltheBern Karma13612 Dec 2015 #129
Hey, come on. That was not nice. It was Bill that carried that tag. We don't know about Hil. erronis Dec 2015 #42
Excellent point. DWS does indeed need to resign before she jwirr Dec 2015 #26
Not a single "Neutral" person NowSam Dec 2015 #32
Are you sure Clinton hasn't gone to the FBI? NCTraveler Dec 2015 #34
I heard she ate the FBI for lunch. Hiraeth Dec 2015 #38
If she had then I would hope she would give them time to investigate before running to the press. Bjorn Against Dec 2015 #39
Sanders fired an aide. So much more was to be known anyway. NCTraveler Dec 2015 #44
Just because a person got fired does not mean that person committed a crime Bjorn Against Dec 2015 #47
Please show where I said it did. NCTraveler Dec 2015 #49
I'm going to guess, "no." Fawke Em Dec 2015 #50
If she had Cassiopeia Dec 2015 #53
why were they having a fund raiser for her? I didn't know FBI salaries were generous azurnoir Dec 2015 #65
Expect Hillary to go into high dudgeon tonight senz Dec 2015 #36
k+r Attorney in Texas Dec 2015 #40
Victimhood is so sweet! redstateblues Dec 2015 #57
Anger fuels the Sanders campaign. AlbertCat Dec 2015 #109
I'm not aware if anything has changed since last night notadmblnd Dec 2015 #52
How telling. nt retrowire Dec 2015 #54
K&R! Duval Dec 2015 #59
Was a law broken? This all seems to be an internal political party matter. randome Dec 2015 #64
Kicked and recommended! What does that tell you? Enthusiast Dec 2015 #67
Exactly why the press - hmmmm azurnoir Dec 2015 #68
Maybe to let the public know the truth before the Bernie Sanders fanatics moobu2 Dec 2015 #75
ah ya that's it of course why didn't I think of that azurnoir Dec 2015 #77
There's still an ongoing investigation. moobu2 Dec 2015 #78
if a crime was committed DonCoquixote Dec 2015 #79
She really is trying to throw the nomination MissDeeds Dec 2015 #86
I don't think ANYONE involved has called it a crime. thesquanderer Dec 2015 #88
Right. Because every time there is political infighting, the cops are called. randome Dec 2015 #89
+ whatever number > than 0. Silly OP MeNMyVolt Dec 2015 #91
There's no crime. treestar Dec 2015 #90
DWS is truly zentrum Dec 2015 #93
Just as she did in 2008. She bypassed Dean's DNC, took gripes straight to media. madfloridian Dec 2015 #96
HUGE K & R !!! - Thank You !!! WillyT Dec 2015 #99
If she didn't go to the press she would've been accused of secrecy. If she went to the cops.... Hekate Dec 2015 #103
It tells me that Wasserman-Schultz CAN BE ACCUSED of a political smear job rocktivity Dec 2015 #105
Debbie Downer has brought the Democratic Party to a new low, time to go! Dont call me Shirley Dec 2015 #106
It speaks volumes about DWS and Hillary. jalan48 Dec 2015 #107
This scandal has close to zero to do with Sanders. PufPuf23 Dec 2015 #108
And what's the most important thing we've learned from this: AlbertCat Dec 2015 #110
Not only is this disgusting... MrMickeysMom Dec 2015 #111
DWS should go! burrowowl Dec 2015 #120
It tells me that she's smart... NurseJackie Dec 2015 #121
WOW, that's your take? SmittynMo Dec 2015 #123
Yes. I wouldn't have said it otherwise. NurseJackie Dec 2015 #125
They settled before a lawsuit could be heard..... Delver Rootnose Dec 2015 #124
You should be thankful it wasn't taken to the FBI. Renew Deal Dec 2015 #127
Oh, you're right. We should be real quiet now so the FBI won't find out ... JustABozoOnThisBus Dec 2015 #139
Who's alleging criminal law was broke, OP sounds like a strawman uponit7771 Dec 2015 #134
Kick BeanMusical Dec 2015 #137
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Debbie Wasserman-Schultz ...»Reply #105