Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: The DNC Data Breach: An Analysis [View all]merrily
(45,251 posts)41. Jury results.
FWIW, I both agree and disagree with Juror 1. I think the level of discourse has dropped here at least in part because many smart people who made this board interesting when I first joined are no longer here. However, Juror 1 is not all wrong, either.
On Mon Dec 21, 2015, 01:03 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
Another "expert" analysis I see.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=929214
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Tacky, gratuitous snark aimed at someone who put together a serious post. This kind of behavior is why the level of discourse here has dropped so low. DU deserves much better.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Dec 21, 2015, 01:09 AM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Yesterday, I would have left this post alone. However, the alerter is correct. This type of rude comment is exactly the reason why the "level of discourse here has dropped so low." Perhaps juries should hide more of them.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Disturbing that you think this is hide worthy.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I resisted the temptation to hide. Snark and knee jerk source shaming is, sadly, common among certain DUers.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Nope, none of those things at all.
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Bernie? The guy who lambasted PAC's and then thanked one for spending money on his behalf?
KittyWampus
Dec 2015
#17
"There is no doubt in my mind that the Clinton campaign stole Sanders and O’Malley’s data"
brooklynite
Dec 2015
#8
T or F: the individual responsible for "data firewalling" decisions was a former HRC employee.
lumberjack_jeff
Dec 2015
#16
Right. the last thing a democracy wants is for the voters to be informed...
TheProgressive
Dec 2015
#21
The timing of the debates is suspect, the amount may satisfy you but clearly not Sanders or O'Malley
highprincipleswork
Dec 2015
#37
Suit yourself. It still remains a bad strategy, that is if you want party unity.
highprincipleswork
Dec 2015
#39
The second the SBS staff saw a result set with data that they shouldn't be seeing then they stop and
uponit7771
Dec 2015
#22
unnn...I doubt 4 of them were bribed to continue to view data they shouldn't be seeing.
uponit7771
Dec 2015
#24
Per Jeff Weaver, a vendor called him in October. Per Josh, it was a different database, not VAN
emulatorloo
Dec 2015
#28
Both were said in interviews on MSNBC I saw live, link to JU's phone interview
emulatorloo
Dec 2015
#32
How do you know? Clinton's DNC owns the data and releases what they want to release...
TheProgressive
Dec 2015
#27
You do realize that the Sanders campaign has done that with this issue right?
mythology
Dec 2015
#31
Again, where is all the data stored? Who informed the media as to what happened?
TheProgressive
Dec 2015
#36
And it's not just who has the most campaign dollars which influences the corporate media's slanted
Uncle Joe
Dec 2015
#33
Bottom line is DWS/Hillary opened up this can of worms and DWS is now in legal trouble
AgingAmerican
Dec 2015
#44