Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

stupidicus

(2,570 posts)
20. that seems to be the choice to be made
Mon Dec 21, 2015, 12:58 PM
Dec 2015

but the party under indictment here appears to have her fingers in the pro-corp pie while convincing the denizens of thirdwayland that her focus is entirely on the other.

I'm absolutely and positively NorthCarolina Dec 2015 #1
indeed stupidicus Dec 2015 #7
Blah blah blah Dem2 Dec 2015 #2
oh, that's why you resorted to the "Blah, Blah" defense? stupidicus Dec 2015 #6
Tax increases are unpopular firebrand80 Dec 2015 #3
It's called 'creeping fascism' AgingAmerican Dec 2015 #8
Not raising taxes is facsim? firebrand80 Dec 2015 #9
Creeping fascism AgingAmerican Dec 2015 #14
Saying they are bad is echoing the right wing that the public sector is bad Armstead Dec 2015 #15
She didn't even say taxes were "bad" firebrand80 Dec 2015 #17
yep, that's the story I've been telling for the last decade and a half or more stupidicus Dec 2015 #18
Have you read their website kenfrequed Dec 2015 #13
Did she preface it with "Read my lips..." HoneychildMooseMoss Dec 2015 #16
to who, thirdwayers and their rightwing cousins and supporters? stupidicus Dec 2015 #23
She's actually a realist. She will get both my votes. yeoman6987 Dec 2015 #4
Right wing tax policy has put us tens of trillions into debt AgingAmerican Dec 2015 #10
no real Democratic voter will back Reagan/Bush in 2015 reddread Dec 2015 #5
well, "Democratic voter" has undergone a definition revision stupidicus Dec 2015 #11
pro-corporate laissez faire vs pro-domestic quality of life reddread Dec 2015 #19
that seems to be the choice to be made stupidicus Dec 2015 #20
they dont need convincing reddread Dec 2015 #22
you have a point stupidicus Dec 2015 #24
include a third possibility (second subset?) reddread Dec 2015 #25
Hmm.. kenfrequed Dec 2015 #12
agreed stupidicus Dec 2015 #21
In short, it means she's AGAINST removing the cap on payroll tax for Social Security! cascadiance Dec 2015 #26
it's hard to say with certainty ain't it? stupidicus Dec 2015 #27
Given Obama's original plans of having a two tiered cap (the second at $250k)... cascadiance Dec 2015 #29
Absolutely. Hillary would rather cut Social Security benefits than eliminate/raise the cap. stillwaiting Dec 2015 #28
It's Republican framing and precludes a progressive agenda. Broward Dec 2015 #30
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Clinton’s no-tax ...»Reply #20