Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: You Decide If MILLIONS "Earned" By Bill Clinton in Speaking Fees During Hillary's Tenure [View all]JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)15. Bill did not write GLB.
You know that right?
It passed with veto proof majorities.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
90 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You Decide If MILLIONS "Earned" By Bill Clinton in Speaking Fees During Hillary's Tenure [View all]
CorporatistNation
Jan 2016
OP
Yes he earned the money he received for his speaking. You could say the same about
Thinkingabout
Jan 2016
#4
Either Bill should have collected fees for speaking OR Hillary should have run for president and
JDPriestly
Jan 2016
#47
Waiting to see the impropriety proof. Wjat would be different in the case
Thinkingabout
Jan 2016
#49
The comparison is utterly weak. I've already heard about the $200,000 she is said to have
JDPriestly
Jan 2016
#53
Do you seriously think the Republicans will need to prove anything about Hillary?
JDPriestly
Jan 2016
#71
Shocking news: People want to pay an ex president who presided over the most successful economy
Amimnoch
Jan 2016
#28
And the Clinton's also are much more in demand than the George W Bush family.
Thinkingabout
Jan 2016
#32
I Saw "The Big Short" Last Night.. I Highly Recommend That Prior to Casting Your Vote in The Primary
CorporatistNation
Jan 2016
#5
Jon L., Thank You... As Honest And Thoughtful People Clearly Understand Is The Clear Fact That
CorporatistNation
Jan 2016
#35
Clearly it did. What is BULLSHIT is claiming that Clinton didn't also support it.
JonLeibowitz
Jan 2016
#76
You didn't qualify your dismissal and if Clinton didn't support it at all it passes...
uponit7771
Jan 2016
#78
Believe what you want. If a President opposes a bill, more nay votes tend to appear.
JonLeibowitz
Jan 2016
#79
I don't laud what I want above the facts, I'll leave that up to conservatives. The facts are the ...
uponit7771
Jan 2016
#86
Just Da Facts Joe... Just da Facts.. And Da Facts Can Be Painful When Ya Have To Look At Them!
CorporatistNation
Jan 2016
#18
When the quid is that large, a quo is implied. The rules of the game. Dumbfucks.
Elmer S. E. Dump
Jan 2016
#38
Are you trying to convey a message? Because your thought, doesn't seem to go anywhere.
jkbRN
Jan 2016
#14
I remember the shit-fit we all had about Reagan going to Japan and getting $3 million for speaking..
Punkingal
Jan 2016
#22
Yeah, all the other progressive works the Clintons have done so far mean nothing at all. :rolleye:
uponit7771
Jan 2016
#77
actually, I DON'T think actors or athletes should make millions either. I think that is
Karma13612
Jan 2016
#68
"Teh Clinton's are teh evil" is some really rough and ragged sand, better to avoid even walking
uponit7771
Jan 2016
#75