2016 Postmortem

CorporatistNation

(2,546 posts)

89. Can You Say... Goldman Sachs?

Reply to tecelote (Reply #2)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 11:27 PM

Jan 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

89 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"The Oligopolization of America" Corporatism Clearly Described In HRC MSM Pump Vs Bernie Blackout! [View all] CorporatistNation Dec 2015 OP

it is because of this that I donate to Bernie Sanders smiley Dec 2015 #1

Same here newfie11 Dec 2015 #6

same here.... smiley Dec 2015 #66

New Years Prediction... Small Donors SURGE IN SUPPORT OF SANDERS!!! CorporatistNation Dec 2015 #7

+1000 nt Live and Learn Dec 2015 #18

Thanks. kristopher Jan 2016 #88

The most important election of our time! tecelote Dec 2015 #2

++++++++++++++++++++ newfie11 Dec 2015 #4

Simply and WELL Said! CorporatistNation Dec 2015 #9

Right on! Proserpina Dec 2015 #11

Oh, they have figured it out. The more money in Wall St, the less democracy on Main St. nt raouldukelives Dec 2015 #14

Yes! nenagh Dec 2015 #22

she's my candidate and the candidate of millions more dlwickham Dec 2015 #79

I See, Here Supporters Prefer To Hold Their "Enthusiasm" Close to the vest... CorporatistNation Dec 2015 #81

do you have a link to support that claim dlwickham Dec 2015 #82

Can You Say... Goldman Sachs? CorporatistNation Jan 2016 #89

The Democratic Presidential Primary This Cycle... IS THE GENERAL ELECTION! CorporatistNation Dec 2015 #3

This is why an open internet is essential for our democracy. Oh, and you can blame Bill Clinton ... Scuba Dec 2015 #5

That's exactly right newfie11 Dec 2015 #8

Spread "The Word" Beyond This Site! THIS IS IMPORTANT In Restoring Our Democracy! CorporatistNation Dec 2015 #10

I'm all over Facebook about this nt newfie11 Dec 2015 #13

Bernie Sanders Represents THE Answer To Turning Back The Corporatist State That Is America Today CorporatistNation Jan 2016 #86

Large amounts of money is supporting defense is Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #12

More government insanity newfie11 Dec 2015 #15

How much of our infrastructure could have been repaired Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #16

And do you think Hillary isn't even a bigger supporter of rxcessive military expenditures. JDPriestly Dec 2015 #17

Exactly! Nt newfie11 Dec 2015 #20

"Bernie wants to audit our military expenditures." Ghost Dog Dec 2015 #23

Sanders has voted for military action, does this mean he Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #27

If you threw out all the Congress people who voted for excessive military spending in their careers, mhatrw Dec 2015 #56

Hillary's gotten more $$$ from the MIC than ANY candidate of either party. 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #30

The priblem is the amount of money which goes to military contractors, it is not the Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #31

I'm not defending the F-35, i agree Sanders is wrong on that ONE position. 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #33

He is continuing to support this program, it makes me wonder why Sanders is Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #35

"Sander has voted for military action & regime changes" <- you offer no proof, no links, nada. n/t 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #38

This is well known, I know what Hillary Clinton's votes have been, I do not Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #42

OK, again. 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #45

Nader: Hillary Clinton is “Poster Child for the Military-Industrial-Complex” 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #40

Poster child, huh, what is the supporter of the F-35 program? Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #43

This article explains it pretty well. It's more about jobs in Vermont 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #46

He should not be complaining about military spending when he is a champion of the F-35. Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #47

Let's look at Lockheed Martin compensation to the executives, $70,442,613 Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #48

Who is the bigger "supporter", the Senator who votes for the omnibus defense funding bill mhatrw Dec 2015 #59

Yeah, Sanders is not perfect. Who is the alternative running on a "dismantle the military" platform? mhatrw Dec 2015 #58

WRONG! WRONG! WRONG!!!! The BEST Investment That A Corporate Entity Can Make... CorporatistNation Dec 2015 #76

A Review of Hillary's Record on Similar Offers Demonstrates That She Has Nary Seen An "Offer" CorporatistNation Dec 2015 #80

Lockheed-Martin gordyfl Dec 2015 #36

Thanks for the information, guess the executives getting big bonus is not a problem also. Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #39

K&R nt Live and Learn Dec 2015 #19

This is how stupid we really are SmittynMo Dec 2015 #21

Despite the awkward title, a great summation of what is at stake Armstead Dec 2015 #24

Exactly, and activists must quit ignoring these facts ViseGrip Jan 2016 #87

We need Bernie.... SoapBox Dec 2015 #25

For anyone who didn't see it davidpdx Dec 2015 #26

Got it! Fuddnik Dec 2015 #28

It is a stupid move to support Clinton in the primary Android3.14 Dec 2015 #29

Quite well said, I must say 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #32

Thanks, and I followed your advice Android3.14 Dec 2015 #49

Ditto! That should be an OP in itself. Spot on! GO BERNIE! ViseGrip Dec 2015 #50

. MohRokTah Dec 2015 #34

Meet the owner of the observer: JTFrog Dec 2015 #41

Well, that automatically makes everything in the article wrong. Right? mhatrw Dec 2015 #61

You're free to link to as many right wing propaganda sites as you like. JTFrog Dec 2015 #64

Bernie Telling It Like It Is gordyfl Dec 2015 #37

Why are we pimping Trump's son in law's website here? JTFrog Dec 2015 #44

The truth backed by history and facts while it hurts, is not pimping. No matter who writes it. ViseGrip Dec 2015 #51

Yea, I'm gagging on all the "truth" around here. JTFrog Dec 2015 #52

The truth here is that 82% of this board are Bernie Sanders supporters. That's for a reason. ViseGrip Dec 2015 #53

That doesn't excuse JTFrog Dec 2015 #54

Ignore Hillary's faults and truth about them, at your own peril. ViseGrip Dec 2015 #55

Oooooo you're so scary. JTFrog Dec 2015 #65

You obviously haven't a clue who Brent Budowsky is Oilwellian Dec 2015 #69

Can Anyone Deny That The Democratic Party Especially When Considering Third Wayers is CorporatistNation Dec 2015 #75

Why didn't you read the article? Why are you trying to dismiss it based on its publisher? mhatrw Dec 2015 #62

Pimping a Brent Budowsky piece? Oilwellian Dec 2015 #68

I Could Give A Flying FUCK About WHo An Author Is IF The Information Is Accurate Which... CorporatistNation Dec 2015 #73

Also, "oligopolization" wildeyed Dec 2015 #70

Are we just constructing sentences out of a list of buzzwords now? firebrand80 Dec 2015 #57

I actually made a random phrase generator wildeyed Dec 2015 #71

K&R! This post should have hundreds of recommendations! Enthusiast Dec 2015 #60

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Dec 2015 #63

Just trying To Get Some Truth Out Here... CorporatistNation Dec 2015 #72

"Brent Budowsky", huh, interesting writer Babel_17 Dec 2015 #67

"Brent Budowsky", huh, bad writer wildeyed Dec 2015 #74

Your persuasive narrative almost convinces me Babel_17 Dec 2015 #77

Hey, I work with what they give me. wildeyed Dec 2015 #83

Let's keep the K&Rs coming (nt) Babel_17 Dec 2015 #78

New Year Kick! ViseGrip Jan 2016 #84

K&R azmom Jan 2016 #85