Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

dballance

(5,756 posts)
5. Umm, That sounds like a reason why they SHOULD test females.
Mon May 19, 2014, 01:13 AM
May 2014

Someone correct me here if I'm wrong. Last I heard, females made up roughly 50-51 percent of our species. So acknowledging something as significant as hormonal cycles in half our population seems pretty logical to me. Unless you are an old white guy doctor with a research grant and an agenda.

Correct me if I'm wrong here. Don't most mature women, before menopause, go through monthly cycles that affect them physiologically? Then they go through menopause that changes them for the rest of their lives?

If you are scientist honestly doing studies you will ensure your population, control group and study group are reflective of the real environment.

ON EDIT:

No wonder we are now finding that standard dosages of medicines for men and women have different effects. Sometimes to quite the detriment of women.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»How feminist biology is c...»Reply #5