Cannabis

napi21

(45,806 posts)

4. Yes I did. It appeared to convey the opinion of the cops, and the Gov. who never wanted

Sun Oct 30, 2016, 11:24 PM

Oct 2016

legal pot. I found it amusing that that Dr kept using the words "might" "could" and "maybe" but no firm statements of fact. The bias was really obvious. SOMEBODY got 60 Minutes to run this right before the electio where legalizing pot is on quite a few ballots. It made me lose a lot of respect in 60 Minutes. They almost always do a really good job in their reporting. This time, if they decided to air this program, they should have also included the pro side.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Anyone catch 60 Minutes cannabis hit piece tonight? [View all] SHRED Oct 2016 OP

I bet over 50 percent of ca mail in is already done MattP Oct 2016 #2

Yes I did. It appeared to convey the opinion of the cops, and the Gov. who never wanted napi21 Oct 2016 #4

Yes SHRED Oct 2016 #5

I voted no on 61 because it has unintended consequences. It only covers about 12% of still_one Oct 2016 #6

YES! It was definitely a sh**load of propaganda. Women shouldn't drink, smoke or take any skylucy Oct 2016 #7

Yes, what crap.. mountain grammy Oct 2016 #8

The doctor was smirking SHRED Oct 2016 #9

That was pretty much my take on it. mountain grammy Oct 2016 #11

I think, at this point, whatever audience 60 minutes has skews REALLY older. Warren DeMontague Oct 2016 #10

MSM is behind the curve. CanSocDem Nov 2016 #13

drug dealers don't want it legalized zippythepinhead Dec 2016 #13

Dec 1969 #