To be clear (Reply #3) - Democratic Underground

In the discussion thread: Open Discussion by & for Berners re: Funding Bernie's long-term GE win. [View all]

Wed Feb 17, 2016, 06:35 PM

3. To be clear

I do love Bernie's uniquely corruption free people-based approach,

but I wonder if anyone's done the math, as to the rate of new donors,
and the trajectory of that, factoring in some guess as to where an
average donor would 'max out' and not continue giving.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

11 replies	Author	Time	Post
Open Discussion by & for Berners re: Funding Bernie's long-term GE win. [View all]	99th_Monkey	Feb 2016	OP
Bad idea.....	daleanime	Feb 2016	#1
I think that depends on how the support is structured, and what is being "promised" <-nothing	99th_Monkey	Feb 2016	#2
To be clear	99th_Monkey	Feb 2016	#3
I give monthly, plus other times, and I haven't reached 500 yet.	Punkingal	Feb 2016	#4
It needs to be done RIGHT! Here are some thoughts...	Peace Patriot	Feb 2016	#5
Thank you for your comments. And I agree about the pristine part.	99th_Monkey	Feb 2016	#6
Not only is it a bad idea	Mufaddal	Feb 2016	#7
Maybe that's why the donors said "...whether he wants it or not"	99th_Monkey	Feb 2016	#9
Understood	Mufaddal	Feb 2016	#11
Okay, just a couple of ideas. First Hillary is being hurt a lot	jwirr	Feb 2016	#8
This is the kind of creative thinking I was hoping for with the OP, so thanks nt	99th_Monkey	Feb 2016	#10

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.