You're right of course, but you have to understand the New Yorker mindset (Reply #16)

In the discussion thread: Rachel Maddow. My rant continues.... [View all]

Mon Feb 29, 2016, 05:28 PM

Mufaddal (1,021 posts)

16. You're right of course, but you have to understand the New Yorker mindset

I would think a Rhodes scholar would know that the Senator from NY's state also borders Mass.

I lived in NYC for years. When people found out I was from Vermont, half the time they didn't know where it was. Someone being a New Yorker (as in NYC) is different from being a New Yorker (as in NYS).

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

39 replies	Author	Time	Post
Rachel Maddow. My rant continues.... [View all]	jillan	Feb 2016	OP
We all know Hillary isn't from NY. She just grabbed that Senate post because it was available,	thereismore	Feb 2016	#1
Actually she never left NY since she ran for senate. She's been there a while.	jillan	Feb 2016	#3
Fair enough, but she isn't from there. nt	thereismore	Feb 2016	#5
I know what your saying. But she has lived there for a little over 15 years. That's more	jillan	Feb 2016	#7
She already had the connections in the first place.	TTUBatfan2008	Feb 2016	#8
She grabbed that senate seat so she could quid pro quo with the big banks.	TryLogic	Feb 2016	#18
"paracaidismo" in Spanish	MisterP	Feb 2016	#20
I never knew anyone who voted based on a candidate's geographic proximity anyway.	arcane1	Feb 2016	#2
That was the msm's explanation for why Bernie won NH in a landslide.	jillan	Feb 2016	#4
God forbid they would say he won it on merit	MissDeeds	Feb 2016	#6
The "neighboring state" thing is mostly based on having higher name recognition than your opponent.	thesquanderer	Feb 2016	#22
I used to like Rachel	MissDeeds	Feb 2016	#9
I hate the way she lectures, too.	Blue_In_AK	Feb 2016	#14
I got that lecture feeling from Rachel's first few shows...	Contrary1	Feb 2016	#24
Like her? I used to love her.	farleftlib	Feb 2016	#28
Maybe Rachel doesn't want her taxes to go up	n2doc	Feb 2016	#10
Count me in as someone that has had it with Rachel Maddow and MSNBC.	Enthusiast	Feb 2016	#11
She, just like all the other talking heads, is an overpaid hack.	Nyan	Feb 2016	#12
Rachael showed her true colors when Keith was booted and she	bbgrunt	Feb 2016	#13
MSNBC is a market researcher	olddots	Feb 2016	#15
You're right of course, but you have to understand the New Yorker mindset	Mufaddal	Feb 2016	#16
That's a ridiculous comment	Depaysement	Feb 2016	#32
I totally understand. I am from Chicago. Being from Chicago is nothing like being from any other	jillan	Feb 2016	#37
MSNBC, hence Rachel, are now owned by Comcast, a crappy right wing media corporation.	TryLogic	Feb 2016	#17
As a New Yorker	HillareeeHillaraah	Feb 2016	#19
I know you downstate folk think you own the bragging rights	dragonfly301	Feb 2016	#30
Wow, that's kind of a terse response	HillareeeHillaraah	Feb 2016	#31
The propaganda is truly overwhelming, some get lots more than others	Land Shark	Feb 2016	#21
not watching TV for the last 8 years is one of the best decisions I've ever made.	NRaleighLiberal	Feb 2016	#23
I see.	in_cog_ni_to	Feb 2016	#25
Oh - I have some info about SC & why the turnout was so low.	jillan	Feb 2016	#26
Oh no.	in_cog_ni_to	Feb 2016	#29
It wasn't just Bernie's problem that he couldn't connect. A lot of voters were remembering 2008	jillan	Feb 2016	#34
I wrote a short OP about three weeks back saying she was a sellout, I was attacked by a lot of folks	onecaliberal	Feb 2016	#27
Yeah. I'm not watching her as much either because she	Cleita	Feb 2016	#33
Subversive Super-Delegates?	Sweetearth	Feb 2016	#35
What? Did she say Subversive Super-Delegates?	jillan	Feb 2016	#36
Sorry about that	Sweetearth	Feb 2016	#38
Sorry I misunderstood :)	jillan	Feb 2016	#39

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.