Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
23. Right. Sanders' employees queried a database that was part of the database provided to them
Mon Dec 21, 2015, 04:48 AM
Dec 2015

by the vendor.

The database should not have been provided to them.

Surely, the DNC required the vendor by contract to maintain the security of each candidate's database and maintain a firewall.

Sanders' campaign did not hack into the database. It was provided to Bernie's staff by a vendor that was either negligent or violated a contractual agreement to protect the privacy of the candidates' information.

Sanders' campaign did not "steal" anything as I understand the facts. They were provided access to a database, access they were not supposed to be provided.

The vendor, it seems to me, is the sole wrong-doer in this situation.

I saw a list of the searches or queries made of Hillary's database by the Sanders employees. They looked like searches that would have identified Hillary's information as hers and as not Bernie's. I realize that Bernie did not like the fact that his staff did that and that Bernie fired them for doing the searches. But I think the real problem was the vendor that was supposed to maintain a firewall.

Technically the second. LiberalArkie Dec 2015 #1
I'm not one for conspiracy theories, TIME TO PANIC Dec 2015 #2
Almost sounds Rovian? Rosa Luxemburg Dec 2015 #5
I hear ya. TIME TO PANIC Dec 2015 #12
I am. On selected topics, like the Kennedy's, COINTELPRO, Nixon sabotaging the Vietnam peace talks PatrickforO Dec 2015 #11
Try the vendor. nt valerief Dec 2015 #15
Right. Sanders' employees queried a database that was part of the database provided to them JDPriestly Dec 2015 #23
This message was self-deleted by its author valerief Dec 2015 #27
The incriminating part for me is that the Sanders campaign reported Jarqui Dec 2015 #3
Well said. Thanks for weighing in & lending some perspective on what likely happened. nt 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author Gman Dec 2015 #18
Great post! JDPriestly Dec 2015 #24
the fact that Hillary wants it OVER RIGHT NOW... grasswire Dec 2015 #4
The DNC certainly changed it's mind quickly! Rosa Luxemburg Dec 2015 #6
The DNC had no chance in court. everything to lose Scootaloo Dec 2015 #8
I have a feeling the Clinton campaign & DNC didn't want a judge overseeing Jarqui Dec 2015 #10
I feel bad for Josh. malokvale77 Dec 2015 #14
I wasn't nearly as efficient in the number words to express what you just said ... Jarqui Dec 2015 #16
Your post was wonderful. malokvale77 Dec 2015 #19
exactly grasswire Dec 2015 #20
I agree. JDPriestly Dec 2015 #25
it does smell funny Doctor_J Dec 2015 #9
What does this say... malokvale77 Dec 2015 #13
Clearly some people are in front of the lettering that shows it's a... Kalidurga Dec 2015 #22
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Dec 2015 #17
Kick and R BeanMusical Dec 2015 #21
The story certainly raises a lot of questions about people on both sides. merrily Dec 2015 #26
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»Curious? First NGP VAN da...»Reply #23