Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
14. Remove by a Simple Majority of the DNC - It's in DNC Articles & By-Laws
Mon Dec 21, 2015, 03:55 PM
Dec 2015
Section 2. The National Chairperson, the five Vice Chairpersons, the National Finance Chair, the Treasurer, and the Secretary, shall be elected:
(a) at a meeting of the Democratic National Committee held after the succeeding presidential election and prior to March 1 next, and,
(b) whenever a vacancy occurs. The National Chairperson shall be elected and may be removed by a majority vote of the Democratic National Committee, and each term shall expire upon the election for the following term.

Section 4. The National Chairperson shall serve full time and shall receive such compensation as may be determined by agreement between the Chairperson and the Democratic National Committee. In the conduct and management of the affairs and procedures of the Democratic National Committee, particularly as they apply to the preparation and conduct of the Presidential nomination process, the Chairperson shall exercise impartiality and evenhandedness as between the Presidential candidates and campaigns. The Chairperson shall be responsible for ensuring that the national officers and staff of the Democratic National Committee maintain impartiality and evenhandedness during the Democratic Party Presidential nominating process.

http://www.georgiademocrat.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DNC_Charter_and_Bylaws_8_20_10.pdf
"forcibly removed?" Why not just "removed?" Sanity Claws Dec 2015 #1
I think that it means fire her rather than wait for her to resign. Kalidurga Dec 2015 #3
It means rather than asking nicely for her resignation, and waiting til Hell Freezes Over. nt 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #4
Yes Kalidurga Dec 2015 #2
Good one. Thanks. nt 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #5
Kinda hard to spin this: -none Dec 2015 #6
What legal method allows her to be "forcably removed?" Agnosticsherbet Dec 2015 #7
Remove by a Simple Majority of the DNC - It's in DNC Articles & By-Laws 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #14
I will not hold my breath wafting for the committee who elected her to that position to remove her. Agnosticsherbet Dec 2015 #18
There are any number of DNC peeps, even executive committee ones, who want her gone 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #19
Nah Nah Nah Nah SmittynMo Dec 2015 #8
Do you really think our opinion about anything..... daleanime Dec 2015 #9
Probably not, but I'm doing this anyway. She's that awful for the Party. merrily Dec 2015 #13
We agree on that my friend, I just fear that the reason she hasn't lost her job.... daleanime Dec 2015 #23
Yeah, I don't remember where I posted this, but I posted, "She's a feature, not a bug." merrily Dec 2015 #26
lol, you have a way of saying things... senz Dec 2015 #36
You as well. I enjoy your posts so much! merrily Dec 2015 #43
Why the heck is the word "forcibly" in there? merrily Dec 2015 #10
I'd rather it said 'involuntarily' too, but I'm still signing it. 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #15
I signed it. I'll chip in for a thesaurus for the author. merrily Dec 2015 #16
LOL - You crack me up, in a good way. n/t 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #17
I love, love, love when someone says I made him or her smile or laugh. merrily Dec 2015 #20
Just ask Obama. He knows darn good and well that not all "force" senz Dec 2015 #37
He and I haven't chatted since 2008. However, you are absolutely right as usual. merrily Dec 2015 #42
You know what? The corruption and ineptitude in the Democratic Party goes far beyond the DNC. Maedhros Dec 2015 #11
We have to start somewhere, and it only takes a simple majority of the DNC 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #22
Agreed. It's an important first step. [n/t] Maedhros Dec 2015 #30
Didn't say a thing Spirochete Dec 2015 #12
Voted. Melissa G Dec 2015 #21
96% yes to 3% no. nt Mnemosyne Dec 2015 #24
done FreakinDJ Dec 2015 #25
Done Luciferous Dec 2015 #27
Done. n/t monmouth4 Dec 2015 #28
Perp walk! valerief Dec 2015 #29
Done! Enthusiast Dec 2015 #31
They'll ignore the results. They don't care what we think or want. Still 96% - 6774 votes in_cog_ni_to Dec 2015 #32
I know how you feel, but disagree this is a lost cause. 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #33
I hope you're right. She needs to GO! The sooner, the better! n/t in_cog_ni_to Dec 2015 #35
Yes, some important people also want her gone LiberalElite Dec 2015 #39
White House petition: 91,286 more needed by Jan. 17th .... 8,714 signatures so far senz Dec 2015 #34
This message was self-deleted by its author LiberalElite Dec 2015 #38
There should be an effort to vote out the committee members that support her. I think most people Chathamization Dec 2015 #40
Signed! Pastiche423 Dec 2015 #41
Done Iwillnevergiveup Dec 2015 #44
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»Politicus Poll: "Sho...»Reply #14