Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
13. There have been others. Besides, that's not disenfranchising anyone.
Wed May 29, 2019, 11:14 AM
May 2019
You may be talking about my comment but you misunderstood my point
I did not call you out. There have been several. Besides, I can't emphasize enough that's not disenfranchising anyone. Who do you think is being disenfranchised? How so? Are they being PREVENTED from voting? Are they being DENIED the right to vote?

Cat-calls from the sidelines and from the cheap-seats for the candidate to "go home" or "return to the senate" IS part of the primary process that's playing out. Ultimately, it's the candidate's decision... or the facts on the ground (support, donors, poll results) that influence their decision or force their hand. --- All part of the "primary process" that is being "allowed to play out."

That is how voters become disillusioned and end up getting disgusted and staying home.
You're talking about immature voters who can't handle disappointment, or who have unrealistic expectations. I blame the "youth soccer culture" for this phenomenon (ie: no winners, no losers, everyone gets a trophy)

People who "stay home" because they didn't get a chance to vote for their favorite candidate... or people who vote third party because their preferred candidate wasn't chosen are immature and pouting. I guess those types of people are going to exist no matter what.

You can't please everyone, right? But at the same time, the "primary process" that's being "allowed to play out" can't be held hostage to accommodate the whims and vanities of the lowest common denominator and 4th tier candidates (and their supporters) who feel entitled to be there, just because they want it.

Look, all I'm trying to say is this: when it comes right down to it, people just need to learn to accept the fact that NOBODY is guaranteed a seat at the debate just because they want one, or just because their supporters feel that he (or she) "deserves" to be there. That's how it works and people just have to learn to accept reality.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
Perez told me that was the plan at a lunch earlier this year. brooklynite May 2019 #1
Post removed Post removed May 2019 #4
Some people have all the luck - why can't I ever get a chance to meet someone famous? Not fair... Skya Rhen May 2019 #7
It doesn't take much, just get involved in local and state politics.... George II May 2019 #11
Remind me to ask Nancy when I have dinner with her in Hartford on June 21. George II May 2019 #9
Univision should hold one in Spanish Celerity May 2019 #2
Or O'Rourke. My Spanish has fallen way off since I graduated from high school and moved out of NYC. George II May 2019 #5
yes! I forgot Beto. Castro is not fluent in it. Probably some others who can speak it as well. Celerity May 2019 #6
No hay problema por Pete nt LibFarmer May 2019 #18
Good DownriverDem May 2019 #3
Agreed! I often see posts where someone complains about being "disenfranchised" because... NurseJackie May 2019 #8
+1000. (nt) ehrnst May 2019 #10
You may be talking about my comment but you misunderstood my point Indygram May 2019 #12
There have been others. Besides, that's not disenfranchising anyone. NurseJackie May 2019 #13
OK, so let's just call it voter suppression then Indygram May 2019 #16
No, that's wrong too! It's not voter suppression. NurseJackie May 2019 #17
Very well said. In no way is this "voter suppression" DesertRat May 2019 #24
Thank you! sheshe2 May 2019 #25
Because it's not "voter suppression." ehrnst May 2019 #20
How does someone calling for a candidate to drop out Hortensis May 2019 #19
People on DU talking "disenfranchises voters"? ehrnst May 2019 #21
Remember the clown car in 2016? DownriverDem May 2019 #14
I know... it was distracting. People only noticed the SPECTACLE of it all... NurseJackie May 2019 #15
+1000. (nt) ehrnst May 2019 #22
What's The Problem? Me. May 2019 #23
Good. Too many means there can't be a real debate among the ones... Honeycombe8 May 2019 #26
Good. comradebillyboy May 2019 #27
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»DNC makes it more difficu...»Reply #13