Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

Gothmog

(145,130 posts)
22. Bernie Sanders is probably just another one-hit wonder
Thu Feb 21, 2019, 08:08 PM
Feb 2019

The Washington Post compares sanders to Santorum https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/02/19/bernie-sanders-is-probably-just-another-one-hit-wonder/?utm_term=.38aeb01c0e30

History shows this is likely to seriously hurt Sanders. CNN’s Harry Enten has compiled a list of every candidate who finished second in one year’s primaries and chose to run again the next time. He found that only six of those 13 people won the nomination in his next race, and only one of those (John McCain in 2008) became their party’s pick without leading the polls in February of the year before the election. The fact that Sanders runs second now is a strong indicator that he will not be the nominee in 2020.

Sanders seems most similar to two people who fared extremely poorly in their next efforts, Eugene McCarthy and Rick Santorum. McCarthy’s rise to fame was a lot like Sanders’s: He was an obscure senator who challenged a seemingly unbeatable leader (President Lyndon B. Johnson) and attracted young voters and liberals with his anti-Vietnam War stance. His lightning in the bottle forced LBJ to drop out in 1968, but when he tried to attract support on his own in 1972, a younger imitator, Sen. George McGovern (D-S.D.), attracted his voters with a broader left-wing and anti-war appeal. McCarthy finished fifth.

Santorum’s meteoric rise among Republicans in 2012 was similar. Languishing in the polls as late as January, the former senator from Pennsylvania rocketed to win the Iowa caucuses on the strength of religious conservatives who did not want to nominate Mitt Romney. He rode their backing to finish second, but when he tried again in 2016, religious conservatives looked for the fresh face. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) and noted neurosurgeon Ben Carson thrashed Santorum among Iowa’s religious conservatives. The man who won the state in 2012 received less than 1 percent in 2016 and quickly dropped out.

Sanders’s chances are slim even if he regains progressive support from his competitors. While his backers contend that the Democratic establishment rigged the 2016 race in Clinton’s favor, the fact is Sanders lost because he got wiped out among African American voters. This is a long-standing problem for white, progressive challengers to the Democratic establishment. Since 1984, African American Democratic primary voters have either supported a serious African American candidate or the more moderate among the white candidates. Sanders would face the same challenge that doomed him in 2016 and has shown no indication that he has figured out how to meet it.
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
Is Bernie 2.0 Eugene McCarthy redux? [View all] GoneOffShore Feb 2019 OP
I hope not tirebiter Feb 2019 #1
Exactly. GoneOffShore Feb 2019 #2
Wow! thanks for the article, Cha Feb 2019 #3
Yeah, Sherman A1 Feb 2019 #4
Opinion, backed with experience and a sense of history. GoneOffShore Feb 2019 #6
Still opinion Sherman A1 Feb 2019 #7
Except that it is more than just opinion. Garrett78 Feb 2019 #10
And that is your opinion Sherman A1 Feb 2019 #12
No, it's math. And not Bernie Math. Real math. Garrett78 Feb 2019 #27
And 24 hours in politics is an eternity Sherman A1 Feb 2019 #31
The key question with regard to Sanders is this: Garrett78 Feb 2019 #33
You may be absolutely correct Sherman A1 Feb 2019 #35
The reasons Sanders does so poorly among POC and non-millennial women is all about "ideas." Garrett78 Feb 2019 #36
We have so many great Democrats running True Blue American Feb 2019 #5
You should forward this to Bernie himself, ASAP! chwaliszewski Feb 2019 #8
Let the voters decide? workinclasszero Feb 2019 #19
One major difference now. The middle class is dying Quixote1818 Feb 2019 #9
Which 1970s are you looking at? George II Feb 2019 #11
Incomes still went much, much further then Quixote1818 Feb 2019 #14
The middle class has been dying for about 4 decades Sherman A1 Feb 2019 #13
Bingo workinclasszero Feb 2019 #20
The late sixties and early seventies was a pretty hate-filled time in America pecosbob Feb 2019 #15
Anyone who runs twice is Gene McCarthy 2.0. ? Autumn Feb 2019 #16
I voted for Bernie in the primary in PA. GoneOffShore Feb 2019 #17
That's the first I've read of him but when I read his article it was clear where he was coming from Autumn Feb 2019 #18
I've been reading Polman a lot as I've spent the last 37 years in Philadelphia. GoneOffShore Feb 2019 #21
Bernie Sanders is probably just another one-hit wonder Gothmog Feb 2019 #22
Great article. Many interesting points and observations. NurseJackie Feb 2019 #24
+1,000,000 George II Feb 2019 #25
Excellent article Docreed2003 Feb 2019 #26
"...the fact is Sanders lost because he got wiped out among African American voters." Garrett78 Feb 2019 #28
"only six of those 13 people won the nomination in his next race..." Awsi Dooger Feb 2019 #30
Bernie lost last time by 4 million votes, and there is little reason to think pnwmom Feb 2019 #32
The "only 6 of 13" argument is silly, I'd agree, but... Garrett78 Feb 2019 #34
He has 100% name recognition and he's polling at 12% among African Americans in SC DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2019 #38
Interesting analysis. brer cat Feb 2019 #37
"... (McCarthy) groused that the American electorate had become A-Schwarzenegger Feb 2019 #23
No Generic Brad Feb 2019 #29
He may well be a legitimate contender for the nomination, but does he have a chance in the general? GoneOffShore Feb 2019 #39
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»Is Bernie 2.0 Eugene McCa...»Reply #22