Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Congratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: Bloomberg Flunks the Wokeness Test [View all]DanTex
(20,709 posts)14. Hmm...
As an African-American, I was raised in a tradition in which voting Republican was simply not done, and in my mature life I havetraditionallyvoted Democratic or Independent. Yet this year, I am coming to realize that the George W. Bush administration is the most promising for black advancement in 35 years. Not since the Johnson administration has there been more concrete movement to free African-Americans from their status as the country's problem raceand the lessons we've learned from LBJ's failures mean that this administration will avoid the pitfalls of the War on Poverty's hand-out philosophy. Who would have thought that a Republican administration would give such promise of reaching the long-sought goal of turning things around for black America?
Predictably, leftist black pundits who claim to represent the black view in America won't grasp the import of this moment. Brent Staples of the New York Times informs us that "black Americans' distrust of this administration is running extraordinarily high." Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, histrionically comparing the irregularities in the Florida vote count to the evils of Selma, urge black Americans to refuse to acknowledge the legitimacy of the Bush administration. Yet these are calls to distrust and resist a golden opportunity for black America.
...
In contrast, what would have happened for blacks if Gore had won? A Gore administration, regarding welfare reform as a necessary evil, would have dragged its feet over every detail. Through court appointments and executive orders, it would have resisted the nation's growing dissatisfaction with affirmative action. Gore might have paid lip service to the rebuilding of inner cities by encouraging white businesses to move into them, but he would have strongly supported the resistance of black victicrats such as New York's Al Sharpton and Charles Rangel to the idea of "whitey moving in on our communities." Gore gave no sign of offering anything as concrete as the Faith-Based and Community Initiatives to encourage these communities to rebuild themselves without relying on Starbucks and Burger King.
Predictably, leftist black pundits who claim to represent the black view in America won't grasp the import of this moment. Brent Staples of the New York Times informs us that "black Americans' distrust of this administration is running extraordinarily high." Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, histrionically comparing the irregularities in the Florida vote count to the evils of Selma, urge black Americans to refuse to acknowledge the legitimacy of the Bush administration. Yet these are calls to distrust and resist a golden opportunity for black America.
...
In contrast, what would have happened for blacks if Gore had won? A Gore administration, regarding welfare reform as a necessary evil, would have dragged its feet over every detail. Through court appointments and executive orders, it would have resisted the nation's growing dissatisfaction with affirmative action. Gore might have paid lip service to the rebuilding of inner cities by encouraging white businesses to move into them, but he would have strongly supported the resistance of black victicrats such as New York's Al Sharpton and Charles Rangel to the idea of "whitey moving in on our communities." Gore gave no sign of offering anything as concrete as the Faith-Based and Community Initiatives to encourage these communities to rebuild themselves without relying on Starbucks and Burger King.
https://www.city-journal.org/html/why-blacks-should-give-bush-chance-12026.html
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I support Bloomberg 'casue I think he has the best chance and the means to defeat Trump
Kaleva
Feb 2020
#1
"I think we disproportionately stop whites too much, and minorities too little"
phleshdef
Feb 2020
#5
Crime bill 1994. Very similar results, but on a national level from both Biden and Bernie.
Amimnoch
Feb 2020
#10
A majority of the members of the Congressional Black Caucus voted for the 1994 Crime Bill.
DemocratSinceBirth
Feb 2020
#17
Massive false equivalency. Bloomberg specifically said black people should be targeted by policy.
phleshdef
Feb 2020
#22
So true based on Democratic principles youd think we all share;its not even arguable yet here we are
InAbLuEsTaTe
Feb 2020
#18
Not surprising that a conservative who supported George W Bush would support Bloomberg.
DanTex
Feb 2020
#7
LOL. He said George Bush is the best thing to happen to Black America in 35 years!
DanTex
Feb 2020
#20
I would draw the line if McWhorter said he was "nauseated by John Kennedy"
DemocratSinceBirth
Feb 2020
#24
Not sure what that has to do with McWhorter being a Bush-supporting conservative.
DanTex
Feb 2020
#26
How should we weigh the opinion of candidates who said they were "nauseated by John Kennedy" ?
DemocratSinceBirth
Feb 2020
#28
I'm not outraged, I'm just pointing out that McWhorter is a conservative, so it makes sense that
DanTex
Feb 2020
#36
Right, that's part of his game. Write conservative articles for the National Review
DanTex
Feb 2020
#38
He defended the policy up until he decided to run. He also mounted a rogue counter-terrorism
emmaverybo
Feb 2020
#13
Who is afraid, for example, that Bloomberg would try to reimpose unduly punitive policies like that
tulipsandroses
Feb 2020
#23
I'm not. He wouldn't be getting the endorsements he's getting if that were so.
Amimnoch
Feb 2020
#29
I believe he would because he has a bigoted world-view and he believes as he has said that to
emmaverybo
Feb 2020
#34
At the same time he was bankrolling republicans and holding fundraisers for the likes of Peter King
tulipsandroses
Feb 2020
#32
He is running because he doesn't want Warren or Sanders- not because he wants to beat Trump
MoonlitKnight
Feb 2020
#31