Democratic Primaries

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,319 posts)

16. Mechanics, crop science, sales, international and national markets, hedging and finance.

Mon Feb 17, 2020, 06:01 PM

Feb 2020

That just shows how out of touch this guy is.

I ran across this kid’s channel by accident a while back.

He covers some of the issues challenges of a modern farmer. It’s way more complicated than digging a hole and planting a seed.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

70 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Tell me again how Bloomberg is the most electable? [View all] Saviolo Feb 2020 OP

Pardon me for a moment Sherman A1 Feb 2020 #1

I think some people believe that because DT wouldn't be able to use $$ against him like he & his napi21 Feb 2020 #2

.... handmade34 Feb 2020 #3

You didn't understand the need to see a comment in context and not take someone else's word Squinch Feb 2020 #47

..I think it's called 'emotional intelligence' whathehell Feb 2020 #67

How does he think 2% of our population is feeding the other 98%? DesertRat Feb 2020 #4

Before long customerserviceguy Feb 2020 #31

You didn't see the comment in context either, I see. This is how the bots succeed. Squinch Feb 2020 #46

Replacing Trump with anyfuckingthing would be a major improvement TheCowsCameHome Feb 2020 #5

I do believe that, the point is we have much better Dem candidates that can kick Trump to the Autumn Feb 2020 #12

We did last time. We had a more electable one on deck. TheCowsCameHome Feb 2020 #15

Biden could do it....with Abrams as his VP and Bloomberg's resources, we can get this done. nt UniteFightBack Feb 2020 #18

I see, Bloomberg is the designated money pit now. TheCowsCameHome Feb 2020 #22

Bloomberg said that himself, so yes he will be the sugar daddy...not money pit. Abrams can help UniteFightBack Feb 2020 #23

He's not doing it. Squinch Feb 2020 #34

Go for the kill? cherryinpa Feb 2020 #57

Do you see women voting for him in light of the lawsuits and sexist things that he has said Autumn Feb 2020 #63

It worked out just fine for the republican side. TheCowsCameHome Feb 2020 #64

Liberal women are nothing like Republican women. They don't fall in line for the things Republican Autumn Feb 2020 #68

Lol.. What's "fine" with Republicans isn't "fine" with us whathehell Feb 2020 #70

I -DO- believe that, and I SAID I do... Saviolo Feb 2020 #13

Bloomberg isn't buying anyone. TheCowsCameHome Feb 2020 #19

Yet, people right here will argue coal miners can't be retrained is certain Hoyt Feb 2020 #6

Yang argued that retraining was only successful 12% of the time redqueen Feb 2020 #11

compared to a Democratic socialist? evertonfc Feb 2020 #7

Shall I point out the obvious. Funtatlaguy Feb 2020 #8

Because he's a billionaire. If your rich anything is okay as long as you attack Trump. Autumn Feb 2020 #9

I think farming today requires a good understanding of mechanics, no? applegrove Feb 2020 #10

Mechanics, crop science, sales, international and national markets, hedging and finance. Hassin Bin Sober Feb 2020 #16

Creativity too. Design. Maintenance of many machines. People go to applegrove Feb 2020 #21

I think not being taken in by dishonest threads requires seeing comments in context and Squinch Feb 2020 #50

Thanks. It was not in context. applegrove Feb 2020 #53

It's getting really hard to stay ahead of the lies. And so disheartening that we have to Squinch Feb 2020 #56

This message was self-deleted by its author applegrove Feb 2020 #59

Because us peons can only vote for a candidate apprroved by the ruling class. CentralMass Feb 2020 #14

If you saw the whole context in which he was speaking, this is a bullshit quote. BusyBeingBest Feb 2020 #17

The relevant section is from about 41:00: BusyBeingBest Feb 2020 #20

Thanks for sharing this! redqueen Feb 2020 #58

If you were a Yang person, he's not that far off, really. BusyBeingBest Feb 2020 #60

Honestly I like all of our candidates. redqueen Feb 2020 #61

Yeah, I like them all too, just disagree on which ones will ultimately beat Trump. BusyBeingBest Feb 2020 #62

Shameless misrepresentation. silverweb Feb 2020 #24

But Fox News is blasting "Bloomberg Sez Farmers R Stoopid!" BusyBeingBest Feb 2020 #25

Of course they are. silverweb Feb 2020 #28

The same people making this claim were claiming that Biden was the most electable Voltaire2 Feb 2020 #26

Saviolo, are you going to acknowledge that this quote isn't in context? BusyBeingBest Feb 2020 #27

I've watched the context now. Saviolo Feb 2020 #32

He was making a joke at the expense of the elite business school crowd, I think, with the "I could BusyBeingBest Feb 2020 #35

He has the most money to devote to the project. Laelth Feb 2020 #29

I disagree with his point. David__77 Feb 2020 #30

If stuff like that put people off, Trump wouldn't be president gollygee Feb 2020 #33

New trend on DU: Someone posts a quote of one of our candidates. The quote is taken Squinch Feb 2020 #36

I've watched the context. I still don't think it's good. Saviolo Feb 2020 #37

Post removed Post removed Feb 2020 #38

Howso? Saviolo Feb 2020 #39

He wasn't belittling anybody. He was talking about the simplicity BusyBeingBest Feb 2020 #40

Next they'll say that he belittled the industrial revolution. The lies are really disgusting. Squinch Feb 2020 #42

It's an agenda, it must be pursued. Truth matters little. BusyBeingBest Feb 2020 #45

I bet about 75% of those who are believing that Bloomberg was belittling farmers in this Squinch Feb 2020 #48

I know. What matters is people see the blurb or headline and believe it, that's what BusyBeingBest Feb 2020 #51

I'd be happy with Amy, Biden, Liz or Bloomberg. But I think Bloomberg has the best chance Squinch Feb 2020 #54

Thanks! I feel like I have to referee a little, LOL. BusyBeingBest Feb 2020 #55

Then no, you didn't watch it. You aren't even close. He made no joke, and he belittled no one. Squinch Feb 2020 #41

Great. Saviolo Feb 2020 #43

This message was self-deleted by its author Squinch Feb 2020 #44

You told me to watch the context. Saviolo Feb 2020 #49

This message was self-deleted by its author Squinch Feb 2020 #52

OP tweet source is anti DNC, anti Democratic Party. MerryBlooms Feb 2020 #65

That must be his charm offensive.. whathehell Feb 2020 #66

Want to see record low POC and youth turnout? Want to piss off white suburban women? Garrett78 Feb 2020 #69