They should find out who leaked it, if true (Reply #14)

In the discussion thread: Reminder; The "Putin helping Sanders" info was classified and leaked anonymously. [View all]

Response to jg10003 (Original post)

Sat Feb 22, 2020, 12:59 AM

rockfordfile (8,171 posts)

14. They should find out who leaked it, if true

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

96 replies	Author	Time	Post
Reminder; The "Putin helping Sanders" info was classified and leaked anonymously. [View all]	jg10003	Feb 2020	OP
Thank you.	SamKnause	Feb 2020	#1
Not appropriately. He said he didn't care and would address when President. THAT is not appropriate.	krissey	Feb 2020	#2
what would you like him to say, without revealing classified info?	jg10003	Feb 2020	#9
We are aware and addressing it and actually do it. I do not trust him at all.	krissey	Feb 2020	#16
show us proof of the large donations	NJCher	Feb 2020	#22
He's been getting large donations through Our Revolution, a dark money org he set up.	pnwmom	Feb 2020	#25
this was discussed on NPR	NJCher	Feb 2020	#39
In the past, Russian oligarchs have funneled huge donations through Republican super pacs	pnwmom	Feb 2020	#48
And this pac can accept international donations. He has not been transparent on who these	Demsrule86	Feb 2020	#87
They will benefit because it will insure Trump is re-elected	Dream Girl	Feb 2020	#78
Here you go:	W_HAMILTON	Feb 2020	#26
The other candisdates should bring this up in debates. nt	SunSeeker	Feb 2020	#32
hey thanks!	NJCher	Feb 2020	#40
So, you already knew the answer to your question and yet you still asked it?	W_HAMILTON	Feb 2020	#41
because they were described as	NJCher	Feb 2020	#42
Yes, we get it, you will come up with whatever excuses necessary to explain away the behavior.	W_HAMILTON	Feb 2020	#43
no, that is not the case	NJCher	Feb 2020	#44
We don't know who the hell made the donations -- that's the point.	W_HAMILTON	Feb 2020	#45
I see you have to resort to throwing loaded terms around	NJCher	Feb 2020	#47
It could be oleg deripaska's money in there.	MontanaFarmer	Feb 2020	#80
You heard some unidentified people discussing this on NPR who apparently have gotten	pnwmom	Feb 2020	#49
I seriously doubt that	NJCher	Feb 2020	#51
You asked for a link and I gave it to you. Now where's your link supporting your idea	pnwmom	Feb 2020	#54
Something smart and useful, he didn't ... he said nothing.	uponit7771	Feb 2020	#53
The BBC did some investigative journalism, by asking the Facebook	Ghost Dog	Feb 2020	#46
FB that owes billions to IRS, refuses to do anything about lying Republican ads?	krissey	Feb 2020	#60
True. So where's the evidence?	Ghost Dog	Feb 2020	#62
Why are you assuming no evidence?	krissey	Feb 2020	#64
I see none presented.	Ghost Dog	Feb 2020	#65
Right, why did they decide it needed classified? Why did Sanders decide we didn't need to know?	krissey	Feb 2020	#67
Much like Trump.	True Blue American	Feb 2020	#72
More and more. Hear about pointing finger in face of NBC guy and yelling about how unfair they are	krissey	Feb 2020	#73
I have	True Blue American	Feb 2020	#75
Thanks	True Blue American	Feb 2020	#68
That would almost be like Fox News saying that really, they are fearful of Sanders running against	krissey	Feb 2020	#69
Some source	True Blue American	Feb 2020	#71
Is it Twitter that said they would just stop political ads at a point because they can't stop lying	krissey	Feb 2020	#74
If Twitter did, I admire that.	True Blue American	Feb 2020	#76
Ya, lol.	krissey	Feb 2020	#77
Lol good point. BS addressing it when president is rich	onetexan	Feb 2020	#66
I will release medical records before the first vote, it is the right thing to do.	krissey	Feb 2020	#70
finally, someone gets it. n/t	5X	Feb 2020	#3
Sanders could've denounced Russia's helping him without disclosing classified information. No, I'm	uponit7771	Feb 2020	#4
He did. In the January debate. And he's told them to go to hell on many occasions.	Garrett78	Feb 2020	#6
No, telling outside involvement to go to hell helping his or any other persons campaign. There	uponit7771	Feb 2020	#10
Really?	wisteria	Feb 2020	#28
You're not the only one, wisteria.	calimary	Feb 2020	#50
You must have. For instance, here's what he told Face the Nation in July of 2018:	Garrett78	Feb 2020	#63
I wonder why our Democratic leadership has been so silent on this. Especially since it's been leaked	Autumn	Feb 2020	#85
That's a lie.	W_HAMILTON	Feb 2020	#29
Bingo. nt	SunSeeker	Feb 2020	#34
+1	uponit7771	Feb 2020	#55
Not a lie, but it wasn't at the debate. It was around the same time, though. Here's the WAPO story:	Garrett78	Feb 2020	#61
From the transcript of the last debate:	W_HAMILTON	Feb 2020	#96
I agree with you.	wisteria	Feb 2020	#27
This is false, Sanders could've kept the denouncement generic and kept out classified info but told	uponit7771	Feb 2020	#56
Great post. Not that most folks here will care. It's all about making political hay.	Garrett78	Feb 2020	#5
+1	DanTex	Feb 2020	#8
The point is that Ruskies want Sanders as Dem nominee. There's no good way to spin that.	Hoyt	Feb 2020	#7
You're right.. the spinning isn't working.. not for	Cha	Feb 2020	#19
So what does the document say, anyway? Can people read it?	David__77	Feb 2020	#11
Was it classified? I read sensitive intelligence, but didn't think that meant classified.	musicblind	Feb 2020	#12
No it was not classified and it looks like Sanders was briefed privately	uponit7771	Feb 2020	#58
Was Democratic leadership brief? I would think they would be. If so why are they remaining silent?	Autumn	Feb 2020	#88
Sanders could've denounced Russia's helping him without disclosing classified information. No, I'm	uponit7771	Feb 2020	#89
My question was. Was Democratic leadership briefed about this? Bernie goes after Russia	Autumn	Feb 2020	#90
What difference would that make? It was Sanders who should've been livid at the involvement in his	uponit7771	Feb 2020	#91
What Democratic leadership says about this makes a big fucking difference.	Autumn	Feb 2020	#92
True, we'll see ... I don't think this ends here	uponit7771	Feb 2020	#93
I don't think it does either This is some serious shit, not just Bad Bernie.	Autumn	Feb 2020	#95
#3 is what I'm most curious about.	Aaron Pereira	Feb 2020	#13
To stop foreign influence in the election.	Qutzupalotl	Feb 2020	#18
The Bloomberg Campaign claimed it had 'very "damaging" info on Sanders the other day.s	CentralMass	Feb 2020	#31
They should find out who leaked it, if true	rockfordfile	Feb 2020	#14
And thank them.	apcalc	Feb 2020	#33
Yet, Knowing What He Did, He Then Lied...	TomCADem	Feb 2020	#15
Of course	Cha	Feb 2020	#20
The only thing I care about is if it's true.	HarlanPepper	Feb 2020	#17
Reminder. It's true.	EveHammond13	Feb 2020	#21
Reminder: what happened in Iowa	ucrdem	Feb 2020	#23
THIS !!!! It seems like the timing has been left out of the narrative.	uponit7771	Feb 2020	#57
This one was very different.	wisteria	Feb 2020	#24
So?	apcalc	Feb 2020	#30
Hey! I've got a great idea!!	blue-wave	Feb 2020	#35
I'm glad we found out.	RandySF	Feb 2020	#36
The Mueller Report also said Putin helped Sanders. nt	SunSeeker	Feb 2020	#37
Good, voters need to know the truth.	radius777	Feb 2020	#38
Bernie is done	aeromanKC	Feb 2020	#52
+1, good point ... especially if he pulls ahead quick. Sanders being upset at WAPO didn't help eithe	uponit7771	Feb 2020	#59
Link to it being classified? What i dont understand is why Sanders info would be	jmg257	Feb 2020	#79
Was this just another	duforsure	Feb 2020	#81
If that's true since this leak the silence of the Democratic leadership is deafening.	Autumn	Feb 2020	#82
lol ... Sanders has known this for a a long time - like 5 years	NYMinute	Feb 2020	#83
Excuses are just as lame as Trump's.	MrsCoffee	Feb 2020	#84
#3 is obvious	madville	Feb 2020	#86
Why isn't he calling for Senate investigations?	mcar	Feb 2020	#94

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.