|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
![]() |
spooked911
![]() |
Tue Mar-23-10 07:23 AM Original message |
Mystery WTC Fuselage Piece |
Refresh | 0 Recommendations | Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
greyl
![]() |
Tue Mar-23-10 08:28 AM Response to Original message |
1. Why do you believe that's part of an aircraft? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
spooked911
![]() |
Tue Mar-23-10 08:01 PM Response to Reply #1 |
16. Because it looks like part of a fuselage. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
greyl
![]() |
Tue Mar-30-10 10:44 PM Response to Reply #16 |
82. It looks like part of a UA 767 that crashed into the WTC. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Ohio Joe
![]() |
Tue Mar-23-10 09:09 AM Response to Original message |
2. Well... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
spooked911
![]() |
Tue Mar-23-10 07:59 PM Response to Reply #2 |
15. the argument was mainly based on the paint colors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Ohio Joe
![]() |
Tue Mar-23-10 11:23 PM Response to Reply #15 |
25. No, you also based it on shape |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
spooked911
![]() |
Wed Mar-24-10 06:02 AM Response to Reply #25 |
29. you're saying it is from AA11? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Ohio Joe
![]() |
Wed Mar-24-10 10:02 AM Response to Reply #29 |
31. And the colors are right where they should be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
spooked911
![]() |
Wed Mar-24-10 07:37 PM Response to Reply #31 |
35. what on earth are you talking about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Ohio Joe
![]() |
Wed Mar-24-10 10:12 PM Response to Reply #35 |
42. As I said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
spooked911
![]() |
Thu Mar-25-10 07:00 AM Response to Reply #42 |
44. the piece is mostly gray with some blue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Ohio Joe
![]() |
Thu Mar-25-10 07:17 AM Response to Reply #44 |
46. Why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
spooked911
![]() |
Thu Mar-25-10 09:16 PM Response to Reply #46 |
63. the problem with your argument is that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Ohio Joe
![]() |
Fri Mar-26-10 12:16 AM Response to Reply #63 |
69. For the fourth time I'll ask you... Why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
spooked911
![]() |
Fri Mar-26-10 12:49 PM Response to Reply #69 |
71. I don't expect it to be pure white. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
travis80
![]() |
Tue Mar-23-10 10:32 AM Response to Original message |
3. what's with WTC airplane debris almost always being near scaffolding? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Tue Mar-23-10 11:01 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Why would that matter, dude? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
zappaman
![]() |
Tue Mar-23-10 11:57 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Travis is on to something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Tue Mar-23-10 12:28 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Okay, so why has no monkey come forward and confessed... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
zappaman
![]() |
Tue Mar-23-10 12:49 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. C'mon dude |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Tue Mar-23-10 01:16 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Why are you defending "Bushco"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Theobald
![]() |
Tue Mar-23-10 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
5. You can't be serious? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Tue Mar-23-10 12:23 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. "Even if your argument was sane" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
spooked911
![]() |
Tue Mar-23-10 08:01 PM Response to Reply #7 |
17. please be specific |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Tue Mar-23-10 08:02 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
spooked911
![]() |
Wed Mar-24-10 06:00 AM Response to Reply #18 |
28. Dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Wed Mar-24-10 10:03 AM Response to Reply #28 |
32. More of your blatant dishonesty, Spooked... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
spooked911
![]() |
Wed Mar-24-10 07:58 PM Response to Reply #32 |
36. Um, wow-- how wrong can you be? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Wed Mar-24-10 08:12 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. Dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
spooked911
![]() |
Thu Mar-25-10 07:03 AM Response to Reply #39 |
45. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Thu Mar-25-10 11:02 AM Response to Reply #45 |
47. Spooked... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
spooked911
![]() |
Thu Mar-25-10 07:59 PM Response to Reply #47 |
57. you said, quote-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
spooked911
![]() |
Wed Mar-24-10 08:01 PM Response to Reply #32 |
38. "pounded mercilessly" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Mar-23-10 07:57 PM Response to Reply #5 |
14. Deleted message |
LARED
![]() |
Tue Mar-23-10 04:47 PM Response to Original message |
11. Spooked, it's time to fess up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
zappaman
![]() |
Tue Mar-23-10 05:58 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. google "spooked 911" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Tue Mar-23-10 08:14 PM Response to Reply #12 |
19. Have you ever seen the bunny cage experiment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
zappaman
![]() |
Tue Mar-23-10 08:22 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Bunny cage experiment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
apocalypsehow
![]() |
Tue Mar-23-10 10:11 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. Oh Lord help me....I had yet to see that...tears streaming down my face.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Tue Mar-23-10 10:20 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. The really scary part is that.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Wed Mar-24-10 10:13 PM Response to Reply #19 |
43. That thread is a pizza lovers delight. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
zappaman
![]() |
Sat Mar-27-10 10:26 PM Response to Reply #43 |
72. Kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
spooked911
![]() |
Tue Mar-23-10 07:55 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. That's all you got? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Tue Mar-23-10 08:15 PM Response to Reply #13 |
20. My theory is WAY more plausible nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
spooked911
![]() |
Wed Mar-24-10 06:51 AM Response to Reply #20 |
30. in any case, just for giggles |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Wed Mar-24-10 06:09 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. Would say with great certainty that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
zappaman
![]() |
Wed Mar-24-10 06:26 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Spooked may be right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Wed Mar-24-10 09:14 PM Response to Reply #34 |
41. Well Bushco did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu Mar-25-10 02:38 PM Response to Reply #34 |
48. You're almost there . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Thu Mar-25-10 04:24 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. Wow, just wow nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
zappaman
![]() |
Thu Mar-25-10 04:36 PM Response to Reply #48 |
51. "but those who saw NO PLANES were ignored!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu Mar-25-10 06:45 PM Response to Reply #51 |
52. Actually, you can see people who saw NO PLANES being ignored on video . .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
zappaman
![]() |
Thu Mar-25-10 07:01 PM Response to Reply #52 |
53. your logic is flawed, to say the least |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu Mar-25-10 07:39 PM Response to Reply #53 |
54. The point was that people were being IGNORED . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
spooked911
![]() |
Wed Mar-24-10 07:59 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Wed Mar-24-10 09:13 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. I don't think I could care less |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
AZCat
![]() |
Tue Mar-23-10 09:24 PM Response to Original message |
22. This is indeed "extremely clear proof". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Wed Mar-24-10 12:45 AM Response to Original message |
26. I'm for the planting theory . . .obviously, there were no planes . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Wed Mar-24-10 12:47 AM Response to Reply #26 |
27. "obviously, there were no planes " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
apocalypsehow
![]() |
Thu Mar-25-10 03:31 PM Response to Reply #26 |
49. "obviously, there were no planes" - Just 200 million pairs of lying eyes, eh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu Mar-25-10 07:47 PM Response to Reply #49 |
55. Who did the counting for you . . . Florida GOP? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
apocalypsehow
![]() |
Thu Mar-25-10 07:57 PM Response to Reply #55 |
56. "planted to call in...planted in the street....NO PLANE hit the second tower..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu Mar-25-10 08:26 PM Response to Reply #56 |
58. They were "illusions" . . . of capitalism . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
apocalypsehow
![]() |
Thu Mar-25-10 08:32 PM Response to Reply #58 |
59. So, it was all just an elaborate demolition job, to save a few bucks on asbestos removal, eh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Thu Mar-25-10 08:37 PM Response to Reply #59 |
60. If you think this is novel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
apocalypsehow
![]() |
Thu Mar-25-10 08:47 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. Hah - done. Just a brief glance and I can already see I'm about enter a whole higher level of crazy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
LARED
![]() |
Thu Mar-25-10 08:57 PM Response to Reply #61 |
62. Unfortunately the good Dr Wood is about as good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
zappaman
![]() |
Thu Mar-25-10 09:44 PM Response to Reply #60 |
65. wow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu Mar-25-10 09:44 PM Response to Reply #59 |
64. To save a few bucks on "scaffolding" . . . you mean billions . . . !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Thu Mar-25-10 10:07 PM Response to Reply #64 |
66. D&P has me (and probably half the universe)... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
zappaman
![]() |
Thu Mar-25-10 10:18 PM Response to Reply #64 |
67. huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu Mar-25-10 10:42 PM Response to Reply #67 |
68. That was the condition for bringing down the WTC towers due to asbestos . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
spooked911
![]() |
Mon Mar-29-10 10:13 AM Response to Reply #59 |
75. No, that was only a small part of it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
spooked911
![]() |
Mon Mar-29-10 10:09 AM Response to Reply #49 |
73. TV doesn't count |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Mon Mar-29-10 10:25 AM Response to Reply #73 |
76. Dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
snooper2
![]() |
Tue Mar-30-10 10:54 AM Response to Reply #26 |
78. what do you do for a living again? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Fri Mar-26-10 12:27 AM Response to Original message |
70. Are you claiming that the first two pictures are... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
spooked911
![]() |
Mon Mar-29-10 10:11 AM Response to Reply #70 |
74. yes and yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Mon Mar-29-10 10:27 AM Response to Reply #74 |
77. Dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
spooked911
![]() |
Tue Mar-30-10 07:15 PM Response to Reply #77 |
79. you seemed to be claiming that I was doing some fakery with the pics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
zappaman
![]() |
Tue Mar-30-10 07:30 PM Response to Reply #79 |
80. I think there is fakery... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Tue Mar-30-10 07:57 PM Response to Reply #79 |
81. No... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
spooked911
![]() |
Fri Apr-02-10 11:15 AM Response to Reply #81 |
83. pray tell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Fri Apr-02-10 11:36 AM Response to Reply #83 |
84. Dude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
spooked911
![]() |
Mon Aug-09-10 07:59 PM Response to Reply #84 |
85. I already answered your specific question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 16th 2024, 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC