|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
madrchsod
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:01 AM Original message |
reid called blagojevich about who was`t acceptable for the senate seat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redstate_democrat
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:04 AM Response to Original message |
1. WOOOOOOOOWWWWW |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
camera obscura
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:10 AM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Now I could swear those three men have something in common |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redstate_democrat
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:14 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IsItJustMe
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:49 AM Response to Reply #5 |
32. Add Roland Burris to the equation and one migh wonder WTF is up with Harry? Don't look, that is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucky 13
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 02:00 AM Response to Reply #5 |
73. 2008 was a HUGE eye-opener for me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
angee_is_mad
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 02:03 AM Response to Reply #73 |
75. You get it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redstate_democrat
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 02:11 AM Response to Reply #73 |
77. I figured it out this year as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marimour
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 02:20 AM Response to Reply #77 |
81. good comparison. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marimour
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 02:17 AM Response to Reply #73 |
80. so true. every single word. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucky 13
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 02:00 AM Response to Reply #5 |
74. dupe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InAbLuEsTaTe
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 05:54 PM Response to Reply #5 |
115. Reid saying blacks need not apply. What a dope - can't we get rid of him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dansolo
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:14 AM Response to Reply #1 |
9. Tammy Duckworth was Rahm Emmanuel's hand picked candidate in 2006 in IL-06 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 01:12 AM Response to Reply #9 |
48. rahm picked her over cegalis and caused a split in the democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:15 AM Response to Reply #1 |
10. yes... reid knows best for us here in illinois |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davsand
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:17 AM Response to Reply #1 |
11. I can't fault Reid's analysis of the situation, but WHAT was he thinking? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redstate_democrat
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:21 AM Response to Reply #11 |
14. He needs to STFU ASAP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:24 AM Response to Reply #11 |
16. jessie and lisa would be a shoe in for the senate seat in 2010 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davsand
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:35 AM Response to Reply #16 |
23. I think Lisa Madigan would win easily. Jackson, not so much. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redstate_democrat
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:37 AM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Where do the Democratic votes come from in Illinois? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davsand
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:47 AM Response to Reply #25 |
30. The trick to winning Illinois statewide is to carry Cook AND... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 01:10 AM Response to Reply #30 |
47. DuPage and Rockford are red, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 01:35 AM Response to Reply #47 |
64. foster carried the eastern part of the 14th. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 01:45 AM Response to Reply #64 |
68. That's what I meant when I said things were changing. But those |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davsand
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 01:49 AM Response to Reply #64 |
70. THAT is why I think so many IL Dems are so pissed off. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:57 AM Response to Reply #23 |
38. jjj would be long shot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:37 AM Response to Reply #1 |
24. Not all congressional races are created equal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redstate_democrat
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:40 AM Response to Reply #24 |
29. But she has never been elected to anything. IF she couldn't get elected there, she can't get |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:59 AM Response to Reply #29 |
39. that is silly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redstate_democrat
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 01:01 AM Response to Reply #39 |
41. Okay, so she could win blue areas but not republican areas. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 01:07 AM Response to Reply #41 |
44. I admittedly don't know all the numbers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:06 AM Response to Original message |
2. what a fucked up way to characterize Reid's contacting the Gov and voicing his opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:22 AM Response to Reply #2 |
15. you do`t live in illinois and are`t the one who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:26 AM Response to Reply #2 |
19. Some are just uninformed n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thunder rising
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:06 AM Response to Original message |
3. Yet again, this is a foolish analysis. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:06 AM Response to Original message |
4. Shocking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurityOfEssence
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:12 AM Response to Original message |
6. I guess Daddy and Jr. can each take a testicle... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mopinko
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 11:38 AM Response to Reply #6 |
91. jr is not dad. and dad is not the monster you are portraying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurityOfEssence
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 04:08 PM Response to Reply #91 |
102. I believe senses of humor are available at amazon.com |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mopinko
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 07:30 PM Response to Reply #102 |
118. ok, ok |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redstate_democrat
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:12 AM Response to Original message |
7. I would love to hear the tape of Reid explaining to Blago how |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marimour
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:56 AM Response to Reply #7 |
37. yep! wonder if those tapes will be released? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
angee_is_mad
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:17 AM Response to Original message |
12. The nail in his coffin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redstate_democrat
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:24 AM Response to Reply #12 |
17. I predict that the shit will hit the fan POST HASTE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
angee_is_mad
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:39 AM Response to Reply #17 |
27. The Afrosphere has been going CRAZY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:20 AM Response to Original message |
13. Harry Reid is a Mormon - blacks were banned from Mormon priesthood until 1978. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurityOfEssence
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:40 AM Response to Reply #13 |
28. Sorry, but I think that's out of line |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marimour
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 01:01 AM Response to Reply #28 |
40. What? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurityOfEssence
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 01:14 AM Response to Reply #40 |
50. Okay, I'll concede that point... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marimour
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 01:18 AM Response to Reply #50 |
54. ok i see your point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurityOfEssence
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 06:29 PM Response to Reply #54 |
117. Ever hear the term "Jack Mormon"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IsItJustMe
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 01:25 AM Response to Reply #28 |
59. You are probably right. But damn, appearances, appearnaces, appearances. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchum
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 01:49 AM Response to Reply #28 |
71. No...Mormonism is a Protestant combination of Judaism's tribalism... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 01:54 PM Response to Reply #28 |
98. Bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dreamer Tatum
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 02:36 PM Response to Reply #98 |
100. Mormons get called racists here all the time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:25 AM Response to Original message |
18. Oh christ, this is NOT tampering |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redstate_democrat
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:29 AM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Yeah, the tampering accusation is probably BS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:30 AM Response to Reply #18 |
21. yes ..i retracted in another post--pressuring is a better word |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:32 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Discussing, that's what politicians do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:49 AM Response to Reply #22 |
31. so reid is picking his choice for our senator? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:52 AM Response to Reply #31 |
34. He is? How is that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:38 AM Response to Original message |
26. Does this mean that we can get a new senate majority leader? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:51 AM Response to Reply #26 |
33. why?..... what`s wrong with harry? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blarch
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 09:52 AM Response to Reply #33 |
86. Jeeesh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
angee_is_mad
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:52 AM Response to Reply #26 |
35. but the three Blacks were unacceptable? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redstate_democrat
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:55 AM Response to Reply #35 |
36. It really is a bad look for ole Harry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 01:04 AM Response to Reply #36 |
42. barack will stay out of this .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marimour
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 01:06 AM Response to Reply #36 |
43. seriously! Let Reid stand on his own on this one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
angee_is_mad
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 01:08 AM Response to Reply #36 |
45. Burris will be the next Illinois Senator |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redstate_democrat
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 01:09 AM Response to Reply #45 |
46. LOL @ "Blagabitch" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marimour
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 01:12 AM Response to Reply #45 |
49. .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redstate_democrat
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 01:16 AM Response to Reply #49 |
52. IL sent TWO of the THREE black senators since Reconstruction to the Senate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marimour
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 01:20 AM Response to Reply #52 |
55. so true. I knew there was another one (and a woman at that!) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 01:29 AM Response to Reply #52 |
61. boy did she get screwed over... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 01:16 AM Response to Reply #45 |
53. angee_is_mad you made my long day.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
angee_is_mad
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 01:23 AM Response to Reply #53 |
57. Don't hate the Playa |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marimour
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 01:14 AM Response to Original message |
51. you know what I don't get? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IsItJustMe
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 01:21 AM Response to Reply #51 |
56. Many people are ignorant about Illinois. The majority of the state population is in the north. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marimour
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 01:26 AM Response to Reply #56 |
60. thanks for the info. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redstate_democrat
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 01:29 AM Response to Reply #56 |
62. Not only that, but there are heavy AA districts downstate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IsItJustMe
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 01:40 AM Response to Reply #62 |
66. Yep, forgot about E St Louis and Madison County.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZ Criminal JD
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:14 PM Response to Reply #56 |
93. The majority of the north is not AA and Latinos |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 01:23 AM Response to Reply #51 |
58. the problem is the republicans ran keyes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marimour
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 01:30 AM Response to Reply #58 |
63. but Obama was leading b4 Keyes entered the race. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 01:42 AM Response to Reply #63 |
67. ryan was a moderate and was close to 45% before he exploded |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marimour
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 01:47 AM Response to Reply #67 |
69. so they went from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 02:06 AM Response to Reply #63 |
76. Mosley Braun ran against a candidate who was intended to be a sacrifical lamb |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marimour
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 02:12 AM Response to Reply #76 |
78. may well but more likely wouldn't have. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nsd
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 04:20 PM Response to Reply #51 |
107. JJJ's problem is that his name is "Jesse Jackson". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 01:36 AM Response to Original message |
65. Harry, what exactly is your criteria for concern? Spying and wars, you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
book_worm
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 01:50 AM Response to Original message |
72. Maybe we better not seat Harry until this is all cleared up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marimour
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 02:13 AM Response to Reply #72 |
79. lol! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luminous Animal
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 02:24 AM Response to Original message |
82. Honestly, you are being an idiot... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marimour
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 02:37 AM Response to Reply #82 |
83. i don't think it was wrongdoing but the implications of his choices are the problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luminous Animal
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 02:41 AM Response to Reply #83 |
84. With zero evidence... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marimour
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 10:13 AM Response to Reply #84 |
89. actually NO I didnt! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
izzybeans
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 09:37 AM Response to Original message |
85. "tampering with the selection process" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 09:57 AM Response to Original message |
87. Seems pretty normal to me. Reid has an interest in the replacements. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lyric
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 09:59 AM Response to Original message |
88. Yeah, because no Senate Majority leader EVER contacts a Governor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Paladin
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
90. Yeah, I Bet Blago Is Shaking In His Wingtips....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 11:44 AM Response to Original message |
92. given that the senate can reject any appointment, this is completely appropriate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 04:17 PM Response to Reply #92 |
106. It makes NO sense to over-rule STATES' RIGHTS. Reid needs to STFU. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 04:44 PM Response to Reply #106 |
108. take it up with the founders, who gave the senate the power to reject appointments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 05:08 PM Response to Reply #108 |
109. Yes, it gave them the power but when an appointment is LEGAL, they are behaving "above the law" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 05:20 PM Response to Reply #109 |
110. that's simply wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 05:23 PM Response to Reply #110 |
111. Yes, ask all the family members of Harry Reid who get their jobs through nepotism? Reid is VOMIT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 05:35 PM Response to Reply #111 |
114. i'm with you on a certain amount of disappointment in our democratic leaders |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZ Criminal JD
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:16 PM Response to Original message |
94. Reid: No African-Americans need apply |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
95. I'm no huge fan of Harry Reid by any stretch, but this really isn't all that huge of a deal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor_J
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
96. Can you imagine a Repuke helping a Dem prosecutor go after a Repuke? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
97. Just go ahead and join the Klan, Reid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uzybone
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
99. Is the Blago camp the source for this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onefreespiritedchick
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
101. What an idiot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 04:10 PM Response to Original message |
103. Let's take Reid out! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 05:31 PM Response to Reply #103 |
113. And he can take gutless Pelosi with him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nsd
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 04:12 PM Response to Original message |
104. What tampering? What are you talking about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
105. Reid is corrupt. He and Pelosi need to be replaced. POSTE HASTE! eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 05:28 PM Response to Original message |
112. "tampering"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InAbLuEsTaTe
![]() |
Sat Jan-03-09 05:59 PM Response to Original message |
116. No doubt Reid was going to got $ under the table if 1 of his white buddies got the gig. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 15th 2024, 06:37 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC