|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
hiaasenrocks
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 08:55 PM Original message |
Someone help me understand this "gwb43.com" thing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMDemDist2
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
1. if i understand correctly WH staffers doing business on a non federal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hiaasenrocks
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 09:05 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. I get that part. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMDemDist2
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 09:08 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. i think the staffers at DOJ may have just included them by accident |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hiaasenrocks
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 09:14 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. Right. Makes sense. I figured that out when I was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 09:50 PM Response to Reply #9 |
33. Exactly...they were reading the messages and subject, maybe scanning for names |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 11:01 PM Response to Reply #9 |
41. Even the politically appointed Republican staffers there are lawyers. Most won't just break the law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 09:04 PM Response to Original message |
2. I'm not sure either... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadMaddie
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 09:04 PM Response to Original message |
3. Know what I think...I think it is symptomatic of this administration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 09:14 PM Response to Reply #3 |
15. Arrogant, sloppy, AND stupid! ya know, if I were going to use an |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hiaasenrocks
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 09:15 PM Response to Reply #3 |
17. Agreed. AND they aren't used to oversight! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 09:05 PM Response to Original message |
4. courtesy of salon.com |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hiaasenrocks
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 09:08 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. It makes sense that they might have been using these |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 09:14 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. Answer: they're human beings and this wasn't the White House e-mail server that was dumped... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hiaasenrocks
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 09:16 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. Thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 09:30 PM Response to Reply #11 |
29. Bush's brain short circuited |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duer 157099
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 09:05 PM Response to Original message |
5. Perhaps they are not very detail oriented? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 09:53 PM Response to Reply #5 |
34. Being stupid and criminal are not mutually exclusive terms. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 09:05 PM Response to Original message |
7. What about election tampering? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacetalksforall
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 09:07 PM Response to Original message |
8. All government communications are supposed to be accounted for. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 09:08 PM Response to Original message |
10. I'm not positive, but I don't think that's how we found that addy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hiaasenrocks
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 09:12 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. I thought it was discovered as part of the document dump. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 09:16 PM Response to Reply #13 |
20. You're right, it's in the e-mails. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GregD
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
12. Message tracking services |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadMaddie
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 09:22 PM Response to Reply #12 |
26. Oh yes GregD...for all of their supposed sophistication they claim |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
18. Why did I find the GOP voter vault website? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hiaasenrocks
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 09:17 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. What the hell is that?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 09:21 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. The website they used to co-ordinate their get out the vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hiaasenrocks
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 09:20 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. Is this the same? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 09:22 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. Probably a different front end for the same thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 09:21 PM Response to Original message |
24. I'm with the sloppy contingent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Contrary1
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 09:22 PM Response to Original message |
27. Look at this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ilsa
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 09:37 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. Wow. I wonder about that now as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 09:23 PM Response to Original message |
28. For one thing, using the private server destroys the claim |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 09:37 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. This is an excellent point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 09:55 PM Response to Reply #31 |
35. Precisely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 10:03 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Another good point in your post ~~ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 10:19 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. that conduct can obviously waive a privilege |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 10:35 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. There is no atty-client privilege with WH counsel. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 10:43 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. Don't you just love Karma! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 10:49 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. IMO, you are correct on what is going on... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 11:11 PM Response to Reply #28 |
43. And a sloppy attitude toward internal security n sensitive matters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
global1
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 09:42 PM Response to Original message |
32. Check This Out - Private E-Mail Servers...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky
![]() |
Wed Mar-21-07 11:08 PM Response to Reply #32 |
42. Best comment at Kos: "...if it's not a WH server, it should be free from claims of Executive Priv" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 15th 2024, 07:36 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC