Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chris Dodd's Tarp amendment exempted the AIG bonuses????!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hoopla Phil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 11:39 AM
Original message
Chris Dodd's Tarp amendment exempted the AIG bonuses????!!!
Just herd this. Is it true???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Which herd are you running with?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoopla Phil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Is it true???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Is it? Why don't you try to find out? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCoxwain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Give him/her a break .. it's probably a typo... we all make our fair share of typos
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marketcrazy1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. this appears to be correct
question is will he be called out on this fuck up....... not holding my breath!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
5. And where did you get this news????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
biopowertoday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. You missed the news from yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. he watered it down
a lot...

<snip>

The rules effectively provide a carve-out for smaller and regional banks that have received limited infusions of cash. But virtually every major U.S. financial firm would be affected by the most stringent restrictions.

Any financial company that has received taxpayer funds would also face strict limits on "excessive expenditures" including entertainment, the use of corporate jets and office renovations.

And it would require the TARP recipients to hold a "Say on Pay" or an annual shareholder vote on approval of executive compensation.

Democratic senators had wanted to impose even stricter conditions. The Senate bill would have required bonuses already handed out to executives at TARP firms to be paid back, cap all executive compensation at TARP firms at $400,000 and ban any bonus for the top 25 employees at all TARP firms. None of this language appeared in the final legislation.

On the other hand, the Obama administration would have reserved the toughest conditions for companies that received firm-specific solutions under the TARP. At the moment, that would be limited to just Citigroup, Bank of America and American International Group.

The restrictions were finalized a day after top Wall Street executives faced angry questioning from House lawmakers at a TARP oversight hearing.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123449029905980509.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
7. Fox Business is The Source
Wingnut sites going bonkers over this one.

Amid AIG Furor, Dodd Tries to Undo Bonus Protections He Put In

Senator Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) on Monday night floated the idea of taxing American International Group (AIG) bonus recipients so the government could recoup some or all of the $450 million the company is paying to employees in its financial products unit. Within hours, the idea spread to both houses of Congress, with lawmakers proposing an AIG bonus tax.

The move represents somewhat of an about-face for the Senator.http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/markets/industries/finance/dodd-cracks-aig---time/

While the Senate was constructing the $787 billion stimulus last month, Dodd added an executive-compensation restriction to the bill. That amendment provides an “exception for contractually obligated bonuses agreed on before Feb. 11, 2009” -- which exempts the very AIG bonuses Dodd and others are now seeking to tax.




Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), chairman of the Senate Banking Committee on Monday suggested the idea of taxing AIG bonus recipients so the government could claw back the $165 million the company is paying in bonuses to members of its financial products unit, reports FOX Business.

"One way or another, we're going to try to figure out how to get these resources back," said Dodd at a banking committee hearing.http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Senate_plans_on_introducing_bill_to_0317.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
biopowertoday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. AND so is the Huff post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Actually the New York Times as well
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/15/business/15AIG.html?hp


Dodd needs to be under some kleig lights answering questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
biopowertoday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. This info was in the Huff post article yesteday..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoopla Phil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
13. Thanks for the info folks.
I had heard this in the car during a news break on the radio. I was very skeptical about it.


Thanks again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
14. Chris Dodd again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jorae28 Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
15. So what did the SENATE approve with this TARP amendment?
Edited on Tue Mar-17-09 05:56 PM by jorae28
Friday, 6 February 2009 - 01:44
UPDATE: US Senate Approves TARP Executive-Comp Limits Amendments

By Patrick Yoest
Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

WASHINGTON -(Dow Jones)- The Senate approved a pair of amendments Thursday that would tighten executive-compensation limits for companies receiving funds from the Treasury Department’s Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP, including a $400,000 executive compensation limit.

They approved an amendment proposed by Senate Banking Chairman Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., that would sharply curtail bonuses for firms receiving TARP funds. It also approved an amendment offered by Sens. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., and Bernard Sanders, I-Vt., that would establish an annual limit of $400,000 -- equal to salary of the U.S. president -- on compensation for any employee at a firm receiving TARP funds.

Both were agreed to by voice vote.

The amendments follow a Wednesday announcement by President Barack Obama that he would impose a $500,000 compensation limit on top executives at firms that receive "exceptional" government aid.

"If you don’t do something about this, we will never be able to build confidence and optimism people need to feel about the program," Dodd said.

The McCaskill-Sanders amendment would not be retroactive, so employees that had already received more than $400,000 in the calendar year in which the legislation became law would not have to forgo the income they already earned. Rather, they would be prohibited from receiving more income in that calendar year. The amendment only deals with employees of firms receiving TARP funds and would be in effect only as long as such firms received the government funds.

Dodd’s amendment would prohibit firms receiving TARP funds from paying bonuses to their 25 highest-paid employees. The Treasury Department could increase the number of employees prohibited from receiving bonuses at firms that receive TARP funds. It also would require a retroactive review of those firms to determine if they had given improper bonuses while receiving TARP funds.

Another provision in the amendment would allow the government to "claw back," or rescind, bonuses or incentives paid to executives if the pay was based on false earnings reports.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 28th 2024, 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC