|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
ColbertWatcher
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:06 PM Original message |
Poll question: Who would you like to see take Rush Limbaugh on face-to-face? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fuzz
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:07 PM Response to Original message |
1. Keith |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:11 PM Response to Reply #1 |
11. I was going to pu Olbermann, but that would have been a bloodbath. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brigid
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:15 PM Response to Reply #11 |
20. I voted Olbermann. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ControlledDemolition
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 09:55 PM Response to Reply #11 |
66. Maybe so, however, Keith could of used the footage in the production of 'Deliverance II'. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trueblue2007
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 12:09 AM Response to Reply #1 |
110. KEITH of course. I can't believe you didn't put his name in the poll !!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NightWatcher
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:07 PM Response to Original message |
2. Mike Tyson??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:12 PM Response to Reply #2 |
13. That would be a worse bloodbath than if he faced Olbermann! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ControlledDemolition
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 09:57 PM Response to Reply #13 |
68. This calls for a poll on which of Rush's appendages Mike should nibble! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indimuse
![]() |
Thu Jun-18-09 07:30 AM Response to Reply #2 |
153. lol.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar
![]() |
Thu Jun-18-09 09:38 AM Response to Reply #2 |
157. When he's hungry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rwheeler31
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:08 PM Response to Original message |
3. All of the above. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Gunslinger
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:09 PM Response to Original message |
4. Henry Rollins |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
and-justice-for-all
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 05:24 AM Response to Reply #4 |
129. That would be massacre!! Rollins owns...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
timeforpeace
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:09 PM Response to Original message |
5. Megatron |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:13 PM Response to Reply #5 |
15. Colbert would be interesting. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ControlledDemolition
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 10:04 PM Response to Reply #15 |
76. Colbert would have the idiot agreeing with him about anything without knowing what 'anything' is! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalmuse
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:15 PM Response to Reply #5 |
18. I was going to say, "Mothra" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:42 PM Response to Reply #18 |
31. Gamera |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ControlledDemolition
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 09:59 PM Response to Reply #31 |
72. I have a feeling 'Barbarella' would really make him crap his Republican diapers! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
3waygeek
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:10 PM Response to Original message |
6. I'd pay good money for a Rush/BillO matchup... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 09:41 PM Response to Reply #6 |
149. Not even close. O'Reilly would beat Limbaugh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Th1onein
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:10 PM Response to Original message |
7. Howard Dean or Dennis Kucinich. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:11 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. I tried to stay away from elected (or formerly elected) officials because ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notesdev
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:10 PM Response to Original message |
8. Roseanne Barr |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:11 PM Response to Original message |
10. Jesse Ventura of course..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 09:12 PM Response to Reply #10 |
53. sh'nough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 09:52 PM Response to Reply #10 |
65. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ControlledDemolition
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 10:01 PM Response to Reply #10 |
75. Bravo! Great choice. Rush would find Jesse's 'water-board-of-truth' worse than the real thing. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 11:09 PM Response to Reply #10 |
93. Bingo !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
magellan
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 11:21 PM Response to Reply #10 |
97. +2 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 11:23 PM Response to Reply #97 |
100. I doubt zitt would agree to a showdown....he a known wimp... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
magellan
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 11:33 PM Response to Reply #100 |
102. Zitt? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 12:29 AM Response to Reply #102 |
112. srrry...zitt butt is Rash L.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
magellan
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 12:46 AM Response to Reply #112 |
115. Oh, I agree with your nickname for him and your conclusion! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 12:55 AM Response to Reply #115 |
117. I borrowed that from Catwoman....LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
csziggy
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 11:27 PM Response to Reply #10 |
101. Yes! Jesse would shred him without touching that oily carcass |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 12:30 AM Response to Reply #101 |
113. The STARE would reduce RL to melted cheese |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:12 PM Response to Original message |
12. A rendering plant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeschutesRiver
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:13 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. ha, good one. This would be my second choice. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeschutesRiver
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:12 PM Response to Original message |
14. The Grim Reaper. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreakinDJ
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:13 PM Response to Original message |
16. Hulk Hogan - times over for talking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JeffR
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:15 PM Response to Original message |
19. Jim Cornette |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WonderGrunion
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 10:53 PM Response to Reply #19 |
89. Agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:17 PM Response to Original message |
21. Anderson Silva |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:17 PM Response to Original message |
22. Janeane Garofalo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hwmnbn
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:19 PM Response to Original message |
23. Jesse Ventura... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quantess
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 11:47 PM Response to Reply #23 |
106. He was the first to come to my mind. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lpbk2713
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:24 PM Response to Original message |
24. Almost any woman. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LAGC
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:35 PM Response to Original message |
25. Bill Maher |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:37 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Someone up thread suggested Colbert. Maher would be a good pick too. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dappleganger
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:57 PM Response to Reply #25 |
43. That would be my first choice, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:39 PM Response to Original message |
27. Whoopie Goldberg |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
28. Me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:54 PM Response to Reply #28 |
37. I'm convinced. Hey Limpballs, debate Octafish! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ControlledDemolition
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 10:18 PM Response to Reply #28 |
78. That would be fully acceptable but showing a little mercy is one of my vices! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Thu Jun-18-09 09:09 AM Response to Reply #28 |
156. heheh....you remembered. It should be easy to get him to admit backing Bushes on BCCI was TREASON. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rurallib
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
29. jesus Christ, but he likely won't show so Ed Schultz |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:41 PM Response to Original message |
30. A Velociraptor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ladyhawk
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 09:58 PM Response to Reply #30 |
71. We can just inflate my Amazon parrot to a truly monstrous size. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 11:16 PM Response to Reply #71 |
95. That scares me too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 05:10 AM Response to Reply #30 |
126. I could go for a velociraptor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 09:48 AM Response to Reply #126 |
133. The Velociraptor might think Rush too icky to touch. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EvolveOrConvolve
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:44 PM Response to Original message |
32. Chuck Norris |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ControlledDemolition
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 10:13 PM Response to Reply #32 |
77. 'Dueling f*ckwits', I love it!! "Obama's a Socialist.... U-dope, he's a fascist-socialist!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:45 PM Response to Original message |
33. lawrence o'donnell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:56 PM Response to Reply #33 |
40. That would be interesting. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greybnk48
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 09:58 PM Response to Reply #33 |
70. Lawrence O'Donnell was my pick too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Parker CA
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 10:31 PM Response to Reply #33 |
85. My pick as well. He would absolutely decimate Limpballs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchum
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:47 PM Response to Original message |
34. Homicidal rough trade |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hassin Bin Sober
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 09:51 PM Response to Reply #34 |
64. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madeline_con
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
35. K.O. man! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mr. Sparkle
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:53 PM Response to Original message |
36. I voted for Mike because ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:55 PM Response to Original message |
38. Robert Reich? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:56 PM Original message |
Jello Biafra |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogknob
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:56 PM Response to Original message |
39. If memory serves... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 09:04 PM Response to Reply #39 |
46. Welcome to DU! Someone must know the name of this doc. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogknob
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 09:14 PM Response to Reply #46 |
56. Thanks... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 04:26 AM Response to Reply #56 |
125. Did it mention FOX alot? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:56 PM Response to Original message |
41. Deleted message |
ColbertWatcher
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 09:06 PM Response to Reply #41 |
47. This is why I am questioning his "greatness." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogknob
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 06:04 PM Response to Reply #47 |
136. I suppose he's great... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fozzledick
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:57 PM Response to Original message |
42. Cthulu |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Telly Savalas
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:58 PM Response to Original message |
44. Why do any of you want to see Rush at all? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 09:06 PM Response to Reply #44 |
49. "Want" is too strong a word. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Telly Savalas
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 09:12 PM Response to Reply #49 |
54. Very well. Why would you have a mild interest in seeing Rush? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 04:17 AM Response to Reply #54 |
121. This would not be to "see Rush" but to watch him get his just desserts. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Telly Savalas
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 09:33 PM Response to Reply #121 |
147. Rush's just desserts would be a quick descent into obscurity. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tom_paine
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 08:58 PM Response to Original message |
45. Me. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mari333
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 09:06 PM Response to Original message |
48. Jon Stewart. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 09:07 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. There ya go! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CRF450
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 09:25 PM Response to Reply #48 |
59. Fuckin A right!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ladyhawk
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 09:57 PM Response to Reply #48 |
69. Yeah, that was my choice, but I doubt Jon would stoop so low. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 10:29 PM Response to Reply #48 |
84. That's My choice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Initech
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 11:44 PM Response to Reply #48 |
105. After the way he took down Cramer, Stewart could easily take on Jabba The Rush. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 09:09 PM Response to Original message |
51. Voted for Amy Goodman. She's strictly top-drawer, IMO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SmileyRose
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 09:10 PM Response to Original message |
52. Michael J Fox. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 09:13 PM Response to Original message |
55. Tank Abbott |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 09:14 PM Response to Original message |
57. Jim Hightower |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
58. Any of those would make him look like a fool. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Sprat
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 09:34 PM Response to Original message |
60. Hanibal Lector |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turbineguy
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 09:36 PM Response to Original message |
61. The Russian Mob |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
62. Me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoPasaran
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 09:50 PM Response to Original message |
63. I'm hoping for face-to-belt sander myself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 09:55 PM Response to Original message |
67. skittles. -- nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OhioChick
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 09:41 PM Response to Reply #67 |
150. +1 Yes, indeed. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ladyhawk
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 10:00 PM Response to Original message |
73. Face to face? A garbage disposal. It works on so many levels. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ladyhawk
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 10:00 PM Response to Original message |
74. Damn dupe. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dorkulon
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 10:18 PM Response to Original message |
79. Wolverine. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ControlledDemolition
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 10:19 PM Response to Original message |
80. Miss Piggy! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ArnoldLayne
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 10:22 PM Response to Original message |
81. Ed Schultz |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iggo
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 10:24 PM Response to Original message |
82. At this point, anyone. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atticus
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 10:28 PM Response to Original message |
83. "come out of his protective cocoon?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomreedtoon
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 10:33 PM Response to Original message |
86. Ed Gein. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madamesilverspurs
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 10:45 PM Response to Original message |
87. Doc Kevorkian |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Princess Turandot
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 10:48 PM Response to Original message |
88. After seeing him tell Bill O'Reilly twice that he was full of sh#t.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 10:54 PM Response to Original message |
90. Edward R. Murrow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adsos Letter
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 11:07 PM Response to Original message |
91. Ray Taliaferro of KGO AM, latenight... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 11:09 PM Response to Original message |
92. A pack of hungry pit bulls?n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RedCloud
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 08:05 PM Response to Reply #92 |
146. Back in the day Mike vick's types. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning rain
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 11:12 PM Response to Original message |
94. Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (D-Fl.). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 11:18 PM Response to Original message |
96. charles manson, or Senator Al Franken. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 11:22 PM Response to Original message |
98. the shark in Jaws. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
4lbs
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 11:23 PM Response to Original message |
99. Wanda Sykes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 11:35 PM Response to Original message |
103. I think command of the facts and down to earth clarity make Hartman the prime choice. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stuart G
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 11:55 PM Response to Reply #103 |
107. If it were a fair fight, Hartman's got a tremendous store of knowledge..nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bobbie Jo
![]() |
Tue Jun-16-09 11:39 PM Response to Original message |
104. Medusa |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iggo
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 12:06 AM Response to Reply #104 |
108. Probably take about half an hour to turn him to stone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KharmaTrain
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 12:08 AM Response to Original message |
109. Been There, Done That... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 04:20 AM Response to Reply #109 |
122. I did not know this! Do you have a transcipt? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KharmaTrain
![]() |
Thu Jun-18-09 07:24 AM Response to Reply #122 |
152. Yep...And The Audio, Too... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
guardian
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 12:16 AM Response to Original message |
111. Satan! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
s-cubed
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 12:38 AM Response to Original message |
114. Jesse Ventura (sp?) Rush would be speechless. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigBearJohn
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 12:52 AM Response to Original message |
116. Jon Stewart |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 12:56 AM Response to Original message |
118. A six foot sausage casing. His status as a festering meat-sack would then be complete. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 01:00 AM Response to Original message |
119. A blind proctologist with a hangover and a bad attitude. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ControlledDemolition
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 06:28 PM Response to Reply #119 |
138. ... and a sharp scalpel! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lamp_shade
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 04:08 AM Response to Original message |
120. President Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cagesoulman
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 04:22 AM Response to Original message |
123. Stephen Colbert |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe the Liberal
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 04:25 AM Response to Original message |
124. Predator. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 05:13 AM Response to Original message |
127. Barbara Walters finds Limbaugh "fascinating" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
T_i_B
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 05:22 AM Response to Original message |
128. Jeremy Paxman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
and-justice-for-all
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 05:25 AM Response to Original message |
130. Krispy Kreme...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 08:56 AM Response to Original message |
131. A black linebacker from any NFL team. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Echo In Light
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 08:58 AM Response to Original message |
132. Jello Biafra, Janeane Garofalo, or Rollins |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteppingRazor
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 09:51 AM Response to Original message |
134. Donovan McNabb. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peekaloo
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 10:04 AM Response to Original message |
135. Michael J. Fox |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 06:23 PM Response to Original message |
137. Kathy Griffin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RamboLiberal
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 06:29 PM Response to Original message |
139. Jon Stewart when he's at his best |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarface2004
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 06:29 PM Response to Original message |
140. howard stern would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Are_grits_groceries
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 06:30 PM Response to Original message |
141. Jim Cornette |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MzNov
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
142. Sam Seder |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JustAnotherGen
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 06:36 PM Response to Original message |
143. Bill Maher |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cherish44
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
144. I think Michelle Obama could verbally shove her stilletto heel up his ass, smiling the whole time.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asteroid2003QQ47
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
145. other: Pooh-Bear: . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky
![]() |
Wed Jun-17-09 09:39 PM Response to Original message |
148. I'm going with Stephanie Miller. Ed's fun, but he gets too flustered & doesn't argue very well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spirochete
![]() |
Thu Jun-18-09 02:43 AM Response to Original message |
151. Freddy Kreuger n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV
![]() |
Thu Jun-18-09 07:38 AM Response to Original message |
154. Jessy Ventrua - WTF |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nyc 4 Biden
![]() |
Thu Jun-18-09 08:43 AM Response to Reply #154 |
155. I agree. Jesse Ventura FTW! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlinPA
![]() |
Thu Jun-18-09 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
158. Kathy Griffin. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Echo In Light
![]() |
Thu Jun-18-09 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
159. I'd also add author Harlan Ellison! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madamesilverspurs
![]() |
Thu Jun-18-09 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
160. Doctor Ruth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kalyke
![]() |
Thu Jun-18-09 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
161. Keith Olbermann |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 15th 2024, 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC