|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
slipslidingaway
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 05:02 PM Original message |
They're Winning - Private insurance companies push for 'individual mandate' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glowing
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 05:08 PM Response to Original message |
1. Looks like they are advocating for single-payer themselves. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 05:12 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. My belief is that this reform will be crafted to keep them in the game |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kath
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 11:23 PM Response to Reply #6 |
50. Yep, it will delay it for decades and decades. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 05:08 PM Response to Original message |
2. The deal...November 2008... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cerridwen
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 05:09 PM Response to Original message |
3. From page 2 - "If healthcare goes down this year,.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 05:10 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Thanks for the important addition and I happen to agree with him n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cerridwen
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 05:13 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. You're welcome. I added a wee bit more below. The last 4 paragraphs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 05:27 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. The real fears are that someone in power would push for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PM Martin
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 05:11 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. How would that work? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cerridwen
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 05:14 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. See the final 4 paragraphs on page 3, please. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 05:16 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. People are waking up to the fact that insurance companies do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uzybone
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 05:13 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. Its an idiotic statement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 05:18 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Why, if something is not done now, do you think the issue will just |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uzybone
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 05:32 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. if it fails now, why does anyone think it will arise again and succeed in the near future? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cerridwen
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 05:42 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. Because people will still get sick and lose their insurance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 05:57 PM Response to Reply #18 |
31. I do not think it will take another 4-8 years, if this is defeated, the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cerridwen
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 05:24 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. Nope. If "we, the people" don't get health care reform this year |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 05:29 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Exactly, time allows more exposure to what the insurance companies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cerridwen
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 05:32 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. It also allows more time for bankruptcies and home loss and job loss. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 05:53 PM Response to Reply #17 |
28. Unfortunately it does, but the public option will not be available |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cerridwen
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 06:10 PM Response to Reply #28 |
35. "not all doctors have to participate"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 06:22 PM Response to Reply #35 |
43. Could be, but then we have to remember that the situation could |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ipaint
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 06:38 PM Response to Reply #43 |
46. We have a failed but in place model of the plan in Mass. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 06:21 PM Response to Reply #13 |
42. On the other hand, if something REAL isn't done, the DEMS will most certainly lose power. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cerridwen
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 06:32 PM Response to Reply #42 |
44. They have until the next election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 06:36 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. The next election is a little over a year away, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 05:47 PM Response to Reply #3 |
25. Good. Let's make sure it goes down. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cerridwen
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 05:50 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. I think you just spoke sacrilege . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 05:56 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. So long as the progressive caucus opposes the bill, I have cover. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cerridwen
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 06:03 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. Good points, all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cerridwen
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 05:12 PM Response to Original message |
7. From page 3 - "They are interested in 45 million new customers," |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ipaint
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 05:36 PM Response to Reply #7 |
19. Wow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cerridwen
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 05:38 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. "Do we really have the upper hand and just not realize it?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 05:46 PM Response to Reply #19 |
24. I think we do, for now they have successfully channeled the anger to support |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ipaint
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 05:44 PM Response to Reply #7 |
23. the last 4 paragraphs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cerridwen
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 05:48 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. You just said in 2 sentences, what the insurance industry is afraid will happen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ipaint
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 05:55 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. Thanks for posting that link, slipslidingaway |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 09:07 PM Response to Reply #29 |
49. YW, my fear as well is that the public option plan could easily |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
juno jones
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 06:52 PM Response to Reply #23 |
47. I'm with ya. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quidam56
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 05:30 PM Response to Original message |
16. They prefer us dead- no chance they will have to pay for any quality health care |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 05:42 PM Response to Reply #16 |
22. They say they care about people, but they really care more about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RufusTFirefly
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 06:08 PM Response to Reply #22 |
34. The insurance industry is concerned about being profitable and meeting shareholders' needs... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 06:14 PM Response to Reply #34 |
37. Exactly, in business to make profits, fiduciary responsibility to shareholders... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
canetoad
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 06:02 PM Response to Original message |
32. This got me wondering |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 06:17 PM Response to Reply #32 |
38. Scary, a new line of business :( hope that never happens and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
abumbyanyothername
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 06:10 PM Response to Original message |
36. Why is a single payer widely viewed as unfeasible? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ipaint
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 06:19 PM Response to Reply #36 |
40. We've all been conditioned to believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RufusTFirefly
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 06:19 PM Response to Reply #36 |
41. "Unfeasible" single-payer is like "unelectable" candidates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kansas Wyatt
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 06:17 PM Response to Original message |
39. If people thought the Bush Medicare Prescription Plan was a giveaway.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 08:50 PM Response to Reply #39 |
48. If the public option does not take off and people are mandated to buy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kath
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 11:24 PM Response to Reply #39 |
51. +100... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 11:47 PM Response to Original message |
52. Sure, that will work. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 12:08 AM Response to Reply #52 |
54. Didn't you get the memo? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 12:35 AM Response to Reply #52 |
55. And if you cannot pay, maybe you'll get a waiver. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 12:35 AM Response to Reply #55 |
56. Maybe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 12:51 AM Response to Reply #56 |
58. Unfortunately it does not give you access to care.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ibegurpard
![]() |
Thu Jul-16-09 11:50 PM Response to Original message |
53. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 12:37 AM Response to Reply #53 |
57. Thank you :) n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chill_wind
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 02:40 AM Response to Original message |
59. K & R. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway
![]() |
Sat Jul-18-09 11:42 AM Response to Reply #59 |
61. Thanks :) n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack
![]() |
Fri Jul-17-09 03:47 AM Response to Original message |
60. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway
![]() |
Sat Jul-18-09 11:43 AM Response to Reply #60 |
62. Thank you :) n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 15th 2024, 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC