|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
TonyMontana (237 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 11:55 AM Original message |
Just give me the REAL REASON for stalling on DADT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
1. See this post, it makes some sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 12:22 PM Response to Reply #1 |
12. Yep. Repealing DADT without doing away with art. 135 means jail for GLBTs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 02:49 PM Response to Reply #12 |
24. That would be true if the judge's order had merely ruled DADT unconstitutional. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 03:31 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Exactly! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 03:44 PM Response to Reply #24 |
31. Ah. I didn't know that. Thanks for the info. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 03:36 PM Response to Reply #12 |
29. Nonsense, there is now a judge's ruling on this issue which |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
2. Because we want to be nice and bipartisan with the rethuglican homophobes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RKP5637 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 12:08 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. For a country that always brags about freedom, equality, civil rights and all, it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RKP5637 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
3. IMO it's all about politics and close to the midterms. Also, from what I've seen, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
4. It's more complicated than some here think. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 12:09 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Or emote. I don't see much thinking going on here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Touchdown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 12:14 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. That is because none of you are being honest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dawgs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 12:16 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. WTF! Are you serious? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Touchdown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 12:37 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Give it up. You're not fooling anybody. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 03:32 PM Response to Reply #4 |
27. Actually, it's much simpler than people here want to believe... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenny blankenship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 12:06 PM Response to Original message |
5. The military will not draw up plans to adapt until *forced to* by changed law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
6. Why shouldn't it be done in an orderly fashion? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 01:09 PM Response to Reply #6 |
17. Interesting argument from a "fix it later" true believer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Touchdown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
9. I don't know what his reasons are, but I do know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
14. Real or not, it's pretty clear you will reject any reason given. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 12:55 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Got it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 01:27 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. It's simply an observation that any reason or explanation will be rejected out of hand. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Touchdown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 02:19 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. And the sleight of hand circumlocutions continue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 01:14 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. Exactly! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Touchdown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 01:26 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. I haven't seen any real reasons yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 01:29 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. So, you are the decider of what is acceptable as "real". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 01:36 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Deleted message |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 03:21 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. Deleted message |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 03:43 PM Response to Reply #21 |
30. So what is the real reason for blowing this historic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 08:16 PM Response to Reply #21 |
39. Deleted message |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
15. You can't upset the wee sensitive bigots or they'll say bad thing about us liberals. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 03:32 PM Response to Original message |
28. Obama ia afraid of the military brass... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 04:11 PM Response to Reply #28 |
32. Wow! Sometimes the truth still gets said. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krawhitham (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 07:21 PM Response to Reply #28 |
36. no he is afraid of losing all independents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 07:22 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Um...I don't know what to say to such incoherence...but I'll try... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laughingliberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 07:36 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. No, it doesn't go back to the policy before DADT. It would follow Phillips' decision & injunction. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 07:01 PM Response to Original message |
33. it deprives the prez of a rose garden photo op. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 07:09 PM Response to Original message |
34. He's an overly cautious politician who made a deal with the military on this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krawhitham (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-21-10 07:10 PM Response to Original message |
35. It has to pass Senate and Rethugs blocked it from coming to the floor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Jun 05th 2024, 01:09 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC