Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Have you ever asked someone in real life who makes +$100,000 per year about raising the FICA cap?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 09:14 AM
Original message
Have you ever asked someone in real life who makes +$100,000 per year about raising the FICA cap?
Not someone on an anonymous Internet web site. But in real life have you ever broached the subject of doing away with the FICA cap to someone who this would actually effect?

I am all for it because I don't even make a quarter of $100,000. But I have a feeling there are a lot of people who aren't real crazy about this idea. They may not post that on an anonymous public website, but I bet the idea of it really burns some peoples asses. Even some progressive peoples asses.

This subject ever came up around someone making that kind of money you know? If you have, how did they react to that idea?

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. We reach the FICA cap in the 4th quarter....
I wouldn't object to raising it. It seems to be a sensible solution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Yea, I hit the cap a few months early a couple times before I retired too
And I feel like you do. But have you ever asked someone who consistently makes say, a couple of hundred grand a year what they thought of the idea? I never have asked anyone in that situation. That is why I asked.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. I make 104,000.... i have no problem eliminating the cap.
Even though that will affect me soon.

It should be gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBGLuthier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. It takes a very mature human being to want to pay more taxes personally
I broke through the cap one year way back last century. The extra amount did not exactly change my life. Bear in mind the real opposition to raising this tax is from the companies that will have to continue to match the tax. That is who really does not want to remove or raise the cap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. Keep it in place for employers on every paycheck and exempt the citizen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. As an employer, you look at total compensation, not the net to the employee
I don't pay anyone over the cap (other than myself, of course) but making a "person" exempt is just an illusion. But paying a lower percentage does have appeal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #18
27. I thought about that later and...
It should be the other way around, cap the employers liability at today's level but remove it for the employee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greymattermom Donating Member (680 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. raise the cap
lower the rate

make the break even point around 200K
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
5. Our income is over that amount and have no problem ELIMINATING the FICA cap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Same here. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
19. I wonder what would happen if the 1st 10,000 was exempt and the rest taxed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
6. FWIW, my step-father makes significantly more than that and he's 100% in favor
of raising, or preferably eliminating, the cap. He's also in favor of raising his federal income tax rate to at least 45% if not more.

For the past 20 years of his career (he's close to retirement now), he's generally reported to the CEO of a fortune 500 or 1000 company, so he's done well for himself. He's quick to point out that he went to public schools through graduate school, relied on government grants and loans to fund his education every step of the way, and that his parents would never have been able to pay for college on their own.

He'll also tell you that he's usually the lone democrat on the leadership team. At least he's the lone vocal democrat. And he's generally the only guy (and it's almost always been guys) advocating more social spending, more educational support, and that higher taxes on people like himself are a very small price to pay for a stable, productive society that gives people like him a chance to "make good", if you know what I mean. So while there are exceptions, I'll bet your assumption is more correct than not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. That is encouraging to hear
I wish we could clone your step-father.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #9
23. May not be able to clone him
but he did raise 3 kids who feel that we belong to, and have a responsibility for, a larger community. We all are supposed to do our part. So my 14 year old goes over to clear the debris from our elderly neighbor's property after Irene so that they can at least get their car out of the driveway. My step-dad does the same, but also puts a certain amount of his private money toward college scholarship funds and advocates for higher taxes on those who can afford it.

(Providing inexpensive and high quality education for everyone is kind of his thing since he feels that it was his ticket to a better life.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
10. That might be an interesting thing to bring up
if I KNEW anybody who made 100K+.

I don't move in those circles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
11. FICA should be applied to ALL income.. wages and otherwise
The dirty little secret is that many "upper income" people get a lot of "income" in the guise of "goodies" that may not be cash
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woodsprite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
12. Hubby makes over 100K and he thinks it's stupid that the whole amt isn't taxed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfpcjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
14. The actual rub will be from people earning $1 million plus, undoubtedly.
Think about it--when are they going to scream? When some power elite-salary person can show that they paid 10 times as much as you did and only received the same benefits.

Social Security benefits are capped at a relatively low level like $1,000/month, are they not?

Even though they scream it has to be. And we must keep SS as a defined benefit, not as welfare. As soon as they turn it into a welfare program with a voucher it can be cut. And, if it can be cut, it WILL be cut. Trust me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. The max for a 2011 retirement is $2, 366 per month
More funds can mean higher benefits for all earners. The maximum is not a set figure, so the maximum can rise to any level that we can afford to pay. Removing the cap would change the entire paradigm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfpcjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. Good point. Thanks for the numbers.
I agree. Give millionaires the same percentage benefit that everyone else gets and keep the program as it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeJoe Donating Member (331 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. I typically hit the cap in Mar/April
I typically hit the cap in Mar/April each year. It's not that I earn 4x the cap, but rather because I get a significant portion of my income in the form of a bonus paid out in the spring.

I'd like to see SS restructured so that we pay for disability and a minimum level of SS through a progressive income tax rather than a regressive payroll tax. For the SS retirement amount about the basic minimum, I think that both the tax level and payouts should be limited.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
15. don't forget, when we talk about raising tax rates or
raising the cap on taxable income we're talking about adjusted gross income.

When someone mentions raising the top income tax rate by 4% on those who earn more than 250,000....we're talking about someone who might really be pulling down substantially more than 250,000. After deductions and adjustments, then, they may pay the same rate you and I do up until 250,000....then just 4% more after that. It's really not as impactful as the gop, the left, and media allow it to sound. ( Not a tax guy, but as an example let's say someone is paid 350,000 per year...a more than nice amount. He deducts and adjusts his way down to 275,000 agi. He might then owe an additional 4% on the 25,000...he owes just 1,000 more than he does now which is already a historic low. That's what the gop is willing to go to the mat for. 1,000 for a well off family.)

Same with FICA wrt adjusted gross income. Someone who might be affected by lifting the cap might be making substantially more than 106,000, gross. If someone makes 200,000 in wages or salary and 20,000 in capital gains, lets say, and adjusts down to 140,000 agi, then he will contribute his share of the contribution (4%?) on the 34,000....he owes another 1,360. That's what the gop is fighting against, willing to default for, willing to demolish SS and medicare for, willing to hold hostage the most vulnerable among us for....so that someone making 220,000 gross doesn't have to pay another 1,360.

Why dems and pundits don't break down the numbers a little better is a mystery. Instead we get pulled into side battles about what rich means, corporate jets, who creates jobs, etc. We've completely lost the accuracy and framing of the discussion. As usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
16. For much of my career, I hovered at and around the cap
and I can tell you the first time I was over the cap and my CPA told me about the cap, I was furious. The only portion of taxes I really wanted to pay was for Social Security, the absurdity of saving me a few bucks in that area struck me hard- at age 23. Every year I paid high taxes, the figure went up and down according to income and expenses and many other things. So 'oh, look, you say a bit here' meant nothing to me. So one year, over the cap, the next under it. Which one had the higher total tax paid? Either one, too many variables.
I've wanted the cap removed since the day I learned it existed. Obama campaigned on the idea, and it was that policy that won my vote in the Primary. It is a simple, excellent idea, and anyone who makes that sort of money and claims to care is just whining and grousing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
17. Mustn't ask the rich to pay the same amount as the rest of us--might ANGER them!
The number one purpose of government in a "democracy"? Appease the rich! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
21. I have gone over the cap and would not mind paying more taxes.
However, if you raise the cap you would have to take the cap off (change) the maximum SS payout. I think most people do not realize that SS is regressive on the front end and progressive on the back end. IOWs - the amount paid out is already a better plan for middle and lower income earners and a bad return for upper income earners. That is why many higher earners object to the cap removal - it is an income redistribution program and most, if not all, people who make $100K to $250K don't think of themselves as anything other than middle-class.

The bigger issue in our country is what is not taxed at all. Why keep going after just wage-earners? Go after all types of income/revenue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
22. I consistently hit the cap for over 25 years and have no problem eliminating it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ItNerd4life Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
26. Democrats will say 'sure'. Republicans will say 'no way in hell'. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct 31st 2024, 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC