Reply #105: Yeah, but the whole thing was

[brentspeak]

that she said that the memo itself was a forgery, even though the content was more or less accurate.

It's clear what happened. Someone forged documents that would incriminate Bush re. his National Guard service. But the forger inserted one or two deliberate flaws in the forged documents. And then, as if on cue, the Freeper "Buckhead", or whatever his name was, "pointed out" (he was told ahead of time what to point out) that the memos contained type that apparently was not yet available on IBM Selectric typewriters of the document's alleged year.

We know that "Buckhead" was part of some convoluted plot because he blogged his "discovery" about an hour after the 60 Minutes broadcast concluded. The document was shown on air for like, five seconds, and so there's no way "Buckhead" could have been able to normally decipher the carefully injected flaw.