Reply #32: are you deliberately misreading my post?

[reorg]

I stated several times that in this scenario (which I did not invent, it is speculation from a French blog reported about in the news) nobody assumes the maid is lying, fer chrissake. How often do I have to repeat it?

Second, it is not about "forced sex" - the scenario assumes a mix-up, that the maid was mistaken for a hooker who would have had agreed beforehand to everything that was taking place. Naturally, if you get mixed up in something like that and especially if you don't want anything to do with that kind of thing it has a devastating effect! Nobody is denying it, on the contrary, the very fact that the maid must have been totally shocked explains why there was no way this thing wouldn't end up with a report to the police. Even if we assume the scenario is true and even if we assume there was no intention to violate anybody's private space whatsoever.

Nobody is trying "to excuse the man", this scenario is trying to offer a plausible explanation. Because, clearly, what has been reported to date doesn't make much sense to quite a few people.