You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #8: Unbelievable? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
Boston Critic Donating Member (606 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-27-06 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. Unbelievable?
Why? Candidates who are behind always ask for more debates. Candidates who are ahead almost always refuse them. One of the rare example to the contrary was when Ford said he's debate Carter when he accepted the nomination in '76. And look where it got him.

Of course if, as you said, Lieberman was on the record agreeing to another debate, there's reason to attack him for cowardice now. Althought I have to wonder if a Lamont/Schelesinger debate doesn't play into Lieberman's hands, letting him argue that if the "extremists" on either end are against him he must be doing something right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC