There was never any proof that the documents were forged. Everytime a right wing assertion was proved wrong, they moved the goal post "Oh, well, none could make a 'th' symbol", then moving on when -that- was disproven....
"The documents used a proportionally spaced font rather than a mono-spaced font. Typewriters type in a mono-spaced font"
In general, true, but there were typewriters in that time period that typed proportionally. For instance, the IBM Selectric could do this, and came out in 1961.
The Daily KOS has an excellent point-by-point analysis of the claims of forgery.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
