You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #2: In what way? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. In what way?
Neither of the people in this debate are denying the existence or the utility of ideology. Anonymous Liberal is arguing that he (and presumably liberals in general) are less blinded to the facts by ideology than current-day American conservatives. Dreher is agreeing that ideology is currently blinding conservatives more than liberals, but that this effect is cyclical. He claims that our values always effect the relative value we attach to facts.

Based on your description of Bell, he seems to argue that the common American view in the 50's was free of any ideological distortion. Both of these people would disagree with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC