You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #24: Back to the original question... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
countmyvote4real Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-04 02:26 AM
Response to Original message
24. Back to the original question...
How gay marriage would effect us heteros negatively?

• Gays will just do it better - fabulous ceremonies and a better success rate. Of course, that doesn’t count if they marry Liza Minnelli. Then all advantages are off.

• There will be less people to feel superior over in a legal way. Everybody can still hate people for their race, religion, politics and sexual persuasion, but hate will have to be “equal” under the law. That only leaves the French to deride. Bummer.

• The children will be confused when there’s no longer a mixed message about equal rights.

• Parents of same sex couples will gain a child of the same sex instead of the opposite sex “they wished they’d always wanted.”

• The Bible will be exposed for not really codifying marriage as being between a man and a woman or a dog and a cat. At it’s best the Bible (if you strive to live by either the Old or New Testament) will be found to have further contradictions in a world thousands of years later. At it’s worst, family pets will sue.

• This is a mixed one. Desirable neighborhoods will become more desirable. Property values will probably go up. Not good for taxes, but great if you’re selling.

• Polygamous families in Utah will have to have multiple husbands.

* It will revoke the sanctity of a marriage. Well maybe so IF your God (whatever) was paying attention to these events. Marriage is as sacred as you believe it to be and yet it still requires a license from the state. Hmmm. Might be a nice way to weasel out of something not so sacred anymore.

Sarcasm off.

I applaud ColordoDem2004 for the presentation of this post. In no way do I mean to deride this poster with the sarcasm of my response. In fact, I can’t think of any real reason why gay marriage should be a threat to any heterosexual marriage.

It’s just stupid and hypocritical to think otherwise.

Equal is equal or it’s not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC