You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #22: Proving a negative isn't so hard.... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
RedSox02 Donating Member (804 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Proving a negative isn't so hard....
Edited on Thu Feb-05-04 04:28 PM by RedSox02
....when money is involved. Besides, if I accuse you of not attending the last two months of high school, generally you should be able to provide documentation to assert otherwise. That should be on record. There should be some military record of where Bush was. On top of that, the cat is already out of the bag as far as the fact that Bush did miss some physicals. So we know he skipped out on at least some obligations.

However, your idea about where Bush might have been instead isn't such a bad one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC