Reply #131: Wrong on so many counts.

[Bake]

(a) The lawyers don't "get half." Most states prohibit a lawyer taking a divorce case on contingency. They get their stated fee, no more. Bear in mind I'm admitted to practice in two states here in the USA, not in the UK. Law and practice there can differ ... so my comments are directed to law here on this side of the pond.

(b) The judge doesn't cut the settlement "in half." If it's a settlement, it's a settlement. No contest. The judge may review it for unconscionability, but that's all. If it's contested, the judge rules, subject to appeals for abuse of discretion.

But let's assume you're right. Paul's worth 800 million pounds. Suppose she gets half - that's 400 million. EVEN IF THE JUDGE CUT THAT to 200 million and the lawyers took half (which ain't happening), she's still got 100 million pounds (and what's the exchange rate today?). NOBODY IS GOING TO SUFFER for that.

(c) I hated, loathed my ex-wife, but I would never have hurt our daughter to spite my ex. I don't think Paul would either.

Your saying "she should go for all she can get" tells me all I need to know. Thanks but no thanks!

Bake