Reply #77: claims

[selador]

"Oh, yeah, unlike me and decent people everywhere. We claim that fetuses are figments of someone's overheated imagination. I guess."

when you speciously claim that abortion is SOLELY between a woman and her body, then you are the one using imagination imo.

and you can use the word "misogynist" as many times as you want. doesn't make it true.

"And I would just say that you have created a world in which some pigs is more equal than others. And just as the notion of "more equal" makes no sense, the notion of something having "some rights", which can be "superseded" by someone else's rights, makes no sense. A dog's breakfast of magical incantations that operate solely and only to turn women into the ones with "some rights" that can be "superseded" by ... something ... else's "rights". Thus making women into human beings who are less equal than other human beings. Good luck with that; me, it gives me a headache and I prefer not to think too long about what goes on in the brains of people who are actually able to look at that nonsense and say "see, that's how it works".

Whose right to do what might supersede YOUR right to life?"

yes, some ARE more equal. a first trimester fetus UNDER THE LAW and under my moral code has no rights to exist.

a viable fetus, does. you need justification for (for example) an abortion in month 7, whereas month 1 as a counterexample should be on demand.