|
The reason that the live Child can sue is that the Court goes back and gives the child person status before it was born. The court requires it to be born alive first but never the less considers it a person before birth for the purposes of the tort suit. Lets keep it real, you were wrong, my point remains. If a fetus is only a part of the mother then why can you be sued for injuries to a person before birth, and not simply injury to the mother?
And btw, why do people mourn miscarriages? Are they just right wing nuts too? I think I get you now, you are blinded by emotion, and thus immune to logic, must be nice to never be wrong.
|
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(35 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
