You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #8: and it can be said [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
bossy22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. and it can be said
that the dissenting opinion forgot about the operative clause. In fact Scalia didnt forget about the prefatory clause....if im right there were a few pages dedicated soley to that clause.

You may disagree with his interpretation of the prefatory clause but he didnt just "dismiss" it

So you agree with the dissent that the second amendment was basically a powerless amendment?

i think you should read this article by Akhil Reed Amar http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/122/nov08/amar.pdf

he explains why scalia's ultimate decision was correct (though the means were not as concrete)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC