Reply #77: "leaps of faith"...?

[RH]

I really don't understand that sort of comment.

In view the evidence there is no possible doubt that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon. I know of no other aircraft apart from a B757 which would fit so exactly with the damage pattern, nor do I see the slightest trace of any real eveidence of a conspiracy to falsify evidence or testimony. That's where the leap of faith and the conjecture comes into it, to suppose that it is possible for literally hundreds if not thousands of people to be knowingly involved in a criminal conspiracy directly entailing the endangerment of their own mortality! Please do not forget that what the witnesses have been alleged to lie about damm near killed them in the process! Would you have lied about it?

I dont know whether or not Hanjour flew the plane. Maybe he did, maybe not. Whoever did fly the plane I think it most likely that the Pentagon was not an intended target, not at least until the very last minute and that's why they've been so officially quiet about certain aspects of the event. An unintended hit on the Pentagon or an own goal would kinda spoil the effect of the story, wouldn't it? I think the C130 that chased the B757 may have had something to do with it. Chase in that direction and maybe you'll get somewhere. The No Boeing nonsense has been going around and around for more than two whole years, in the same old circles, and its no further to anywhere now than it was when it started.