You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #19: I'd call it criminal negligence [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
noise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-15-08 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. I'd call it criminal negligence
Edited on Tue Apr-15-08 11:40 AM by noise
at best. Dereliction of duty also comes to mind.

Turning in a paper without running a spelling check fits the notion of incompetence. It doesn't seem to do justice to ignoring crucial warnings of a massive terrorist attack.

Strange how the "incompetent" Bush administration successfully made the case that the real reason 9/11 wasn't prevented was due to the lack of police state tactics. Did it (the police state tactics PR campaign) have anything to do with anthrax floating around D.C.? Not at all! That was a "coincidence" followed by an "incompetent" FBI investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC