Reply #40: Maybe it isn't.

[greyl]

If you understood my question and ran it through your mind, you might comprehend what I'm getting at.

Please define what you mean by "hard evidence".
I already surmise that you're either ignoring previous discussions on this, or are demanding an inappropriately high level of evidence that Osama was involved.
I'd rather defend Silverstein and others against bullshit attacks from The 9/11 Truth Industry than specifically prosecute Osama bin laden. Especially in a thread with such a stupid opening post, where I know a few of the people involved are champions of invincible ignorance.